Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Flux normalization on every centered sphere

Statement

Assume Countable Choice and n≥2. For every r>0, with the outward normal of Br(0), −∫∂Br∂νΦ dS=1; the same calculation works for the logarithmic n=2 kernel.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω, let n≥2, let r>0, and use the normalized kernel Φ.

[A1]

Countable Choice is written ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). It is used through the kernel, sphere-measure, surface-integration, and positive-finite-ball interfaces cited below; the calculation requires no full Axiom of Choice.

[F1]

With ωn−1=∣Sn−1∣>0, the kernel is Φn(x)=∣x∣2−n/((n−2)ωn−1) for n≥3 and Φ2(x)=−(2π)−1log⁡∣x∣ for x≠0 (Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian).

[F2]

The chart surface measure scales by Rn−1 under ω↦a+Rω, and ∣Sn−1∣=n∣B1∣ (Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).

[F3]

On a compact embedded C1 hypersurface, ∫S1A dS defines its surface area measure for Borel A, and signed integrands with finite absolute integral are integrated by subtracting their positive and negative parts (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces).

[F4]

The Lebesgue integral is complex-linear on L1(μ) (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F5]

The directional derivative Dvf(a) is the derivative at zero of t↦f(a+tv) (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map U⊆Rm→Rn); here ∂νΦ(x) denotes Dν(x)Φ(x) on the sphere, where Φ is smooth in a neighborhood of each point.

[F6]

For s>0, (sα)′=αsα−1 for every real α (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).

[F8]

For every integer n≥1, Vn(1)=πn/2/Γ(n/2+1) (The closed form for the volume of the unit n-ball).

[F9]

For s>0, Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s) and Γ(1)=1 (The real Gamma functional equation Γ(s+1)=sΓ(s)).

[F10]

Every Euclidean ball of positive radius has positive finite Lebesgue measure under Countable Choice (Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure).

[F12]

A Euclidean map is Ck when each component is Ck (Ck Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).

[F13]

Finite componentwise sums and products of Ck Euclidean maps are Ck, and composites of composable Ck maps are Ck (Ck Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1A1F1F2F6F7F8F9algebra

For n≥3, put qn(s)=s2−n/((n−2)ωn−1) for s>0. By [F6], qn′(s)=2−n(n−2)ωn−1s1−n=−1ωn−1sn−1. For n=2, put q2(s)=−(2π)−1log⁡s for s>0. By [F2], [F8] and [F9], ω1=∣S1∣=2∣B1∣=2V2(1)=2π, and [F7] gives q2′(s)=−12πs=−1ω1s. Thus in both cases qn′(s)=−1ωn−1sn−1(s>0).

1.2F3F6F11F12F13F14givenalgebra

The sphere Sr=∂Br(0) is nonempty because (r,0,…,0)∈Sr. It is closed and bounded, hence compact by [F14]. At each x∈Sr, some coordinate is nonzero; take the least index j with xj≠0. Near x, the sphere is the graph of xj=sgn⁡(xj)r2−∑k≠jxk2. Its radicand is positive near the projected point; the inner polynomial and positive-base square-root are C1 by [F6], [F12] and [F13]. These graph charts cover Sr, have rank n−1, and their coordinate transitions are C1 by [F13], giving Sr the compact embedded C1 hypersurface structure used by [F3]. Every tangent vector is the velocity of a differentiable curve in the sphere. Differentiating ∑kγk(t)2=r2 at x by [F11] shows the tangent plane is contained in x⊥; its dimension is n−1 by the chart rank, so it equals x⊥. The unit normal candidates are ±ω for x=rω, ∣ω∣=1. Since x+tω=(r+t)ω is outside the ball and x−tω=(r−t)ω is inside for 0<t<r, the outward unit normal is ν(x)=ω.

1.3A1F2F3F10

By [F2] and [F3], ∫Sr1 dS=rn−1∫Sn−11 dS=ωn−1rn−1. This is finite: [F2] gives ωn−1=n∣B1∣, and [F10] gives ∣B1∣<∞. Thus constant functions are integrable on Sr.

2.1F1F5step 1.1step 1.2algebra

For x=rω∈Sr, the line in direction ν(x)=ω satisfies x+tω=(r+t)ω near t=0. By [F5] and step 1.1, ∂νΦ(x)=DωΦ(x)=lim⁡t→0qn(r+t)−qn(r)t=qn′(r)=−1ωn−1rn−1. The derivative is taken on a neighborhood of each sphere point and does not evaluate the singular kernel at the pole.

3.1A1F3F4step 1.3step 2.1algebra

By [F4], steps 1.3 and 2.1 give −∫Sr∂νΦ dS=−qn′(r)∫Sr1 dS=1ωn−1rn−1 ωn−1rn−1=1. This uses only the stated ACω convention in the surface-integration interface [F3].

4.1A1F4step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1algebra∎

For 0<r<R, take 0<t<min⁡(r,R−r). At x=rω, x−tω=(r−t)ω lies in the excised hole, while x+tω=(r+t)ω lies in the annulus. Thus its outward normal at the inner boundary is −ω. Hence ∂νinnerΦ(rω)=D−ωΦ(rω)=−qn′(r)=1/(ωn−1rn−1). Using the same area and integrability calculation as in step 1.3 and linearity [F4], this contextual inner-boundary calculation gives negative flux −1.

Source notes

Hunter §2.6.1, equation (2.14), printed p. 33 (PDF p. 39), computes the radial derivative, and equation (2.15) states −∫∂BrDΓ⋅ν dS=1 with the same sign as Φ. Hunter notes that the flux is independent of r by the divergence theorem and harmonicity on the annulus; this proof instead derives the radial derivative and multiplies by the chart surface area. Schmidt §2.1, printed p. 12 (PDF p. 14), defines F=−Φ; its printed p. 13 (PDF p. 15) says ∫Srν⋅∇F dHn−1=1 and explicitly assigns that normalization as an exercise-class verification. This is a sign-convention comparison, not the proof used here. On the inner boundary of an excised annulus the normal is −ω, so its negative flux is −1.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources