How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flux normalization on every centered sphere
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and . For every , with the outward normal of , the same calculation works for the logarithmic kernel.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume , let , let , and use the normalized kernel .
Countable Choice is written (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). It is used through the kernel, sphere-measure, surface-integration, and positive-finite-ball interfaces cited below; the calculation requires no full Axiom of Choice.
With , the kernel is for and for (Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian).
The chart surface measure scales by under , and (Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).
On a compact embedded hypersurface, defines its surface area measure for Borel , and signed integrands with finite absolute integral are integrated by subtracting their positive and negative parts (Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces).
The Lebesgue integral is complex-linear on (The Lebesgue integral is linear on ).
The directional derivative is the derivative at zero of (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map ); here denotes on the sphere, where is smooth in a neighborhood of each point.
For , for every real (Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers).
For every integer , (The closed form for the volume of the unit -ball).
For , and (The real Gamma functional equation ).
Every Euclidean ball of positive radius has positive finite Lebesgue measure under Countable Choice (Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure).
Differentiable real functions obey the product rule (Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: , , , and when ).
A Euclidean map is when each component is ( Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms).
Finite componentwise sums and products of Euclidean maps are , and composites of composable maps are ( Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition).
Proof
For , put for . By [F6], For , put for . By [F2], [F8] and [F9], , and [F7] gives Thus in both cases
The sphere is nonempty because . It is closed and bounded, hence compact by [F14]. At each , some coordinate is nonzero; take the least index with . Near , the sphere is the graph of Its radicand is positive near the projected point; the inner polynomial and positive-base square-root are by [F6], [F12] and [F13]. These graph charts cover , have rank , and their coordinate transitions are by [F13], giving the compact embedded hypersurface structure used by [F3]. Every tangent vector is the velocity of a differentiable curve in the sphere. Differentiating at by [F11] shows the tangent plane is contained in ; its dimension is by the chart rank, so it equals . The unit normal candidates are for , . Since is outside the ball and is inside for , the outward unit normal is .
By [F2] and [F3], This is finite: [F2] gives , and [F10] gives . Thus constant functions are integrable on .
For , the line in direction satisfies near . By [F5] and step 1.1, The derivative is taken on a neighborhood of each sphere point and does not evaluate the singular kernel at the pole.
By [F4], steps 1.3 and 2.1 give This uses only the stated convention in the surface-integration interface [F3].
For , take . At , lies in the excised hole, while lies in the annulus. Thus its outward normal at the inner boundary is . Hence . Using the same area and integrability calculation as in step 1.3 and linearity [F4], this contextual inner-boundary calculation gives negative flux .
Source notes
Hunter §2.6.1, equation (2.14), printed p. 33 (PDF p. 39), computes the radial derivative, and equation (2.15) states with the same sign as . Hunter notes that the flux is independent of by the divergence theorem and harmonicity on the annulus; this proof instead derives the radial derivative and multiplies by the chart surface area. Schmidt §2.1, printed p. 12 (PDF p. 14), defines ; its printed p. 13 (PDF p. 15) says and explicitly assigns that normalization as an exercise-class verification. This is a sign-convention comparison, not the proof used here. On the inner boundary of an excised annulus the normal is , so its negative flux is .
Depends on
- Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure
- Surface integration on compact C1 hypersurfaces
- The Lebesgue integral is linear on $L^1(\mu)$
- Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map $U\subseteq\mathbb{R}^m\to\mathbb{R}^n$
- Continuity and derivatives of positive-base real powers
- The natural logarithm has derivative 1/x and equals the integral from 1 to x of 1/t
- The closed form for the volume of the unit $n$-ball
- The real Gamma functional equation $\Gamma(s+1)=s\Gamma(s)$
- Euclidean balls have positive finite Lebesgue measure
- Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients: $(f+g)'(c) = f'(c) + g'(c)$, $(\alpha f)'(c) = \alpha f'(c)$, $(fg)'(c) = f'(c)g(c) + f(c)g'(c)$, and $(f/g)'(c) = \bigl(f'(c)g(c) - f(c)g'(c)\bigr)/g(c)^{2}$ when $g(c) \ne 0$
- $C^k$ Euclidean maps and diffeomorphisms
- $C^k$ Euclidean maps are closed under componentwise algebra and composition
- Heine-Borel in $\mathbb{R}^n$: with the Euclidean metric a subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
106 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (2014) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Thomas Schmidt, Partial Differential Equations I (2026 complete lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)