How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure
Statement
Assume and . The chart surface measure on equals the polar measure . Orthogonal transformations preserve it. The map , , multiplies surface measure by , and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume , . Compare the chart measure and existing polar measure on the unit sphere. For scaling take and .
Chart integrals are independent of charts and partitions. (Chart and partition independence of surface measure).
The polar formula holds for every nonnegative Borel function. (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma).
Borel substitution holds for C1 diffeomorphisms. (Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness).
Increasing simple approximation justifies the separated product integration and passage from set measures to integrals. (Monotone convergence for the integral).
Proof
Write for chart measure and take a finite sphere atlas with a subordinate partition . Since , differentiation gives . For , , the derivative has columns . Its Gram determinant is , hence with . The inverse is , so is a diffeomorphism onto its open annular sector.
For a Borel set , apply F3 on each sector to . Its pullback times the Jacobian is the separated nonnegative function . Integrating this product gives , where . The product integration identity follows first for simple functions of y by the defining product measure of rectangles, then by increasing simple approximation. Summing j, the partition identity shows that the volume of equals .
Applying F2 to the indicator of that same annular cone gives its volume as . Thus for every Borel A, and division by the strictly positive C gives . For an orthogonal O, , while . Applying F1 chartwise proves orthogonal invariance and the factor , also for integrals by simple approximation.
Use F2 with : . A possible contribution at the origin is absent because the polar formula already applies to this indicator. Step 3.1 now yields the asserted chart area .
Source notes
Hunter §1.11, Proposition 1.45 and its preceding sphere parametrization, printed pp. 16–17 (PDF pp. 22–23). The identification with the existing cone-defined measure is proved here.
Depends on
Used by
- The fundamental Hessian is not absolutely locally integrable Counterexample
- Fourier restriction and adjoint extension operators Definition
- Fundamental solution for the positive operator minus Laplacian Definition
- A point source produces a uniform expanding sphere Example
- Flux and scaling on balls Example
- Flux normalization on every centered sphere Example
- Holes and truncated space-time cones Example
- Newton shell theorem from harmonic mean values Example
- Newtonian Hessian kernels fit the Calderón–Zygmund framework Example
- Newtonian potential of radial compact data Example
- The two-dimensional logarithmic kernel has unit normalized flux Example
- Bessel and Slobodeckij norms agree at order one half Lemma
- Exterior finite-energy functions have a trace controlled by their gradient Lemma
- Finite-energy transmission pairs have the double-layer kernel representation across polyhedral edges Lemma
- Fourier transform of the three-dimensional plane Poisson kernel Lemma
- Heat-ball representation formula Lemma
- Lipschitz finite-energy transmission pairs have the double-layer kernel representation Lemma
- Local integrability of the Laplace fundamental kernel Lemma
- Polynomial traces, monomial basis and bounded evaluation for the ball Hardy space Lemma
- Radial derivative of a spherical average Lemma
- Reflection invariance and vanishing first moment of the sphere measure Lemma
- Smooth-boundary trace lifts and Sobolev Helmholtz layer extensions Lemma
- Sphere graph charts, surface density, and a finite partition Lemma
- Sphere integrals of a cylindrical function project to weighted ball integrals Lemma
- Spherical cap and dual slab scales Lemma
- Stationary-phase decay for spherical surface measure Lemma
- The cancelled representation of the second derivatives of Newtonian potentials Lemma
- The energy identity on a truncated wave cone Lemma
- The mean-value L² bound for holomorphic functions on a polydisc Lemma
- The three-dimensional Newton kernel is a fundamental solution Lemma
- Weighted monomial integrals and monomial norms for the disc, ball and polydisc Lemma
- Green representation for classical Poisson data Theorem
- Hölder data give a classical Newtonian solution Theorem
- Kirchhoff's formula in three dimensions Theorem
- Poisson kernel and bounded Dirichlet problem on a half-space Theorem
- Symmetry of the Dirichlet Green function Theorem
- The Helmholtz single-layer and double-layer traces have the Laplace jump signs Theorem
- The negative Laplacian of the fundamental solution is the unit Dirac distribution Theorem
- The smooth Helmholtz combined field is a compact perturbation of half the identity Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (standard reference, not scraped)