How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Flux and scaling on balls
Example
Assume , , and . On , gives . Constant vector fields have zero total flux. If and admits a C1 extension to the closed ball, its flux is .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Assume , , and a centre a. Use the specified radial and constant fields; the general radial field is assumed to extend C1 through the centre.
The divergence theorem applies to a ball and a C1 field. (Divergence on a bounded C1 Euclidean domain).
Sphere area scales by R to the power n minus one. (Agreement with the existing polar sphere measure).
Verification
The sphere is a C1 boundary: near any point one nonzero component of lets its equation be solved as a smooth square-root graph, with the ball on the inner side. Its outward normal is . For , each , so , and on the boundary . F1 yields ; dividing by R and using F2 gives both stated area formulas. The ball has positive volume since it contains a cube of positive side length. In dimension three a spherical chart , , , has tangent squared lengths and 1 and zero cross inner product, hence density . Rotated charts cover its omitted meridian and poles.
For a constant vector b all partial derivatives vanish. Applying F1 gives . For the radial field and , . Summing gives . The stipulated C1 extension supplies the value at the centre and the hypotheses of F1; no assertion about a singular f at zero is needed. On the sphere the flux density is the constant , proving the claimed flux.
For the explicit polynomial field the extension is automatic. Its divergence is also at the centre by direct differentiation. Thus its flux is , and F1 gives . In particular at R=1, a=0 this moment is by F2.
Source notes
Hunter §§1.10.2–1.11, sphere element and Proposition 1.45, printed pp. 16–17, and §1.12 Theorem 1.46, printed p. 17 (PDF pp. 22–23). These radial-field instances are evaluated directly.
Depends on
Used by
- The wrong normal gives the wrong sign Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (standard reference, not scraped)