Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-09
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Borel change of variables from the compact-support formula and Radon uniqueness

Statement

Assume ACω. Let m1, let U,V be open subsets of Rm, and let T:UV be a C1 diffeomorphism. For every nonnegative Borel h:V[0,], Vh(y)dy=Uh(T(x))detDT(x)dx, with equality in [0,] and 0=0. This statement concerns Borel h; no completed-measurable substitution is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Assume ACω. Let m1, U,V open in Rm, T:UV a C1 diffeomorphism, and h:V[0,] Borel. Put J=detDT.

[F1]

Continuous functions on closed nondegenerate boxes are Riemann integrable. (Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable).

[F2]

Riemann integrability is equivalent to Darboux integrability. (The multidimensional Darboux and tagged-mesh definitions of the Riemann integral agree).

[F5]

Pointwise bounds and nonnegative scaling pass to integrals. (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral).

[F6]

Integrable real functions have linear integrals. (The Lebesgue integral is linear on L1(μ)).

[F7]

An injective C1 map with invertible derivative admits compact-support Riemann substitution. (A compactly supported Riemann integrand admits the global change-of-variables formula from a diffeomorphism near the relevant compact preimage).

[F8]

Continuous maps pull back Borel sets to Borel sets. (A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets).

[F9]

Integrating a nonnegative measurable density defines a measure. (The indefinite integral of a nonnegative measurable function is a measure).

[F10]

Compact Euclidean sets have finite Lebesgue measure under AC_omega. (Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure).

[F11]

Compact-finite Borel measures on second-countable LCH spaces are regular. (Locally finite Borel measures on second-countable LCH spaces are regular).

[F12]

Nonnegative increasing simple approximations converge in integral. (Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F13]

Equality of compactly supported continuous integrals identifies Radon measures. (Uniqueness of the RMK representing measure among Radon measures).

[F14]

Pointwise products of measurable functions are measurable with the zero-times-infinity convention. (Arithmetic and lattice operations preserve measurability whenever they are defined).

Proof

1.1

First let k be a real continuous compactly supported function on an open Euclidean set W. Its zero extension is Borel by F8 once continuity below is established. Its zero extension is continuous: its compact support has a positive distance from the closed complement of W, and k vanishes outside that support. On a closed nondegenerate bounding box Q the extension is Riemann integrable by F1 and Darboux integrable by F2. For a grid partition, assign each point to one adjacent cell to disjointify the cells; all removed faces are null by F4. The step functions formed with the infimum and supremum of k on each closed cell bound k, and their integrals are precisely the lower and upper Darboux sums by F3. Add a constant making k and both step functions nonnegative. F5 squeezes its Lebesgue integral between the Darboux sums, whose gap tends to zero by F2. All are bounded on a finite-measure box, so F6 subtracts the added constant. Thus the Riemann and Lebesgue integrals of k agree.

givenF1F2F3F4F5F6F8
1.2

For Borel A in U set μ(A)=λm(T(A)) and ν(A)=AJdλm. Since T(A)=(T1)1(A) is Borel by F8 and T is injective, images preserve disjoint unions; hence mu is a Borel measure. F9 makes nu a Borel measure. For compact K, T(K) is compact and J is bounded on K, so F10 gives μ(K)< and ν(K)supKJλm(K)< (empty K gives zero). U is second-countable and locally compact Hausdorff as an open Euclidean set. F11 therefore makes both measures Radon.

givenF8F9F10F11
2.1

For fCc(V), k(x)=f(T(x))J(x) with J=detDT has compact support contained in T1(suppf) and is continuous, since J is continuous and T is a homeomorphism. Extend f and k by zero. T is injective C1 with invertible derivative, so F7 applies to these Riemann-integrable extensions. Step 1.1 identifies both resulting integrals as Lebesgue integrals and gives Vf=U(fT)J.

step 1.1F7
2.2

For nonnegative Borel psi on U, the definitions give ψdμ=Vψ(T1(y))dy and ψdν=UψJdx first when psi is an indicator, then by finite additivity for nonnegative simple psi. For general psi use sk=2k2kmin(ψ,k), taking min(infinity,k)=k. These are Borel simple, increase to psi, and their compositions and products with positive J increase to the required integrands. F12 proves both identities. F8 and F14 verify the measurability of every composition and product. Subtracting positive and negative parts extends the identities to real compact-support continuous psi, whose absolute integrals are finite by step 1.2.

step 1.2F8F12F14
3.1

For φCc(U) take f=φT1Cc(V). Step 2.1 and the two identities in step 2.2 give φdμ=Vf=U(fT)J=φdν. The Radon hypotheses were proved in step 1.2, so F13 yields mu=nu on all Borel subsets of U.

step 2.1step 1.2step 2.2F13
4.1

For the stated nonnegative Borel h put ψ=hT, Borel by F8. The first identity in step 2.2 gives Vh=Uψdμ; step 3.1 replaces mu by nu, and the second identity gives Uψdν=U(hT)J. These are identities of nonnegative extended integrals and involve no subtraction of infinities. If U is empty then V is empty and both integrals are zero.

step 2.2step 3.1F8

Source notes

Hunter, §1.11 Theorem 1.44, printed p. 17 (PDF p. 23), for the substitution statement. The Darboux bridge and Radon-uniqueness proof below are local, and do not consume the defective published compact-support Lebesgue or measurable-C1 proofs.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

101 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources