Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-01
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The multidimensional Darboux and tagged-mesh definitions of the Riemann integral agree

Statement

A bounded function on a nondegenerate rectangle is Darboux integrable with value II if and only if all tagged grid sums converge with mesh to II.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded f:QRf:Q\to\mathbb R, with fB|f|\le B, on a nondegenerate rectangle QQ.

[L1]

Every tagged sum lies between its grid's Darboux sums (Tagged grid partitions and Riemann sums in Rm\mathbb{R}^m).

[L3]

Refining by a fixed grid changes the bounds only by the boundary-slab estimate (Refinement raises multidimensional lower sums and lowers upper sums, with a quantitative boundary-slab estimate).

[L5]

Repeated equal subdivision and the Archimedean reciprocal property give grid partitions of a nondegenerate rectangle with arbitrarily small mesh (Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm\mathbb{R}^m, their cells, refinements and mesh, For every ε>0\varepsilon > 0 in a complete ordered field there is a natural n1n \ge 1 with 1/n<ε1/n < \varepsilon).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If ff is Darboux integrable, choose a fixed grid P0P_0 with small gap by [L2]. For any sufficiently fine PP, refine it with P0P_0; [L3] makes the Darboux bounds of PP differ from those of the refinement by arbitrarily little. Since the refined lower and upper sums trap II, [L1] makes every tagged sum over PP close to II.

L1L2L3
1.2

Conversely, suppose every sufficiently fine tagged sum is close to II. By [L5], choose one grid below the convergence mesh threshold and, using [L4], tag each cell near its supremum and then near its infimum. The two tagged sums approximate U(f,P)U(f,P) and L(f,P)L(f,P), so their common closeness to II makes the Darboux gap arbitrarily small.

L4L5given
2.1

Apply [L2] in step 1.2. Since the near-upper and near-lower tagged sums are both arbitrarily close to II, the common lower/upper integral lies arbitrarily close to II and therefore equals II. Both directions give the same value.

step 1.1step 1.2L1L2

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 75 results over 19 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources