Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-13
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite sums of product tests are dense on product open sets

Statement

For integers p,q1 and open URp, VRq, every ΦD(U×V) is a limit in the LF test topology of finite sums of products f(x)g(y) with fD(U) and gD(V). All approximating supports and the target support lie in one compact product inside U×V. This holds in ZF.

Facts & Assumptions

[F1]

Nonnegative smooth compact cutoffs equal to one near compact sets exist (Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization).

[F2]

The smooth-bump rescaling formula is ρε(z)=εdρ(z/ε) (The mollifier family generated by a unit-mass smooth bump). In this proof all auxiliary integrals and mass normalizations are Riemann integrals; no Lebesgue approximate-identity theorem is invoked.

[F3]

Uniform limits of functions and their first derivatives on coordinate intervals identify the derivative of the limit (If continuously differentiable functions converge at one point and their derivatives converge uniformly on a closed interval, then the functions converge uniformly to a differentiable function whose derivative is the derivative limit), componentwise for complex functions.

[F4]

Compactly supported Riemann integrands obey diffeomorphic change of variables (A compactly supported Riemann integrand admits the global change-of-variables formula from a diffeomorphism near the relevant compact preimage), used only for translations and positive scalar dilations.

[F5]

Finite-dimensional Riemann integrals obey linearity and the absolute bound (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm); all tagged grid sums of an integrable function converge with mesh to its integral (The multidimensional Darboux and tagged-mesh definitions of the Riemann integral agree); and continuous product integrands obey Riemann Fubini (Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections). Complex statements follow by real and imaginary parts.

[F6]

Common compact support and uniform convergence of every derivative give LF test convergence (Sequential convergence in test function space).

Proof

Given: integers p,q1, open URp and VRq, and ΦD(U×V), extended smoothly by zero to the whole Euclidean product.

1.1

If Φ=0 use the constant sequence of empty sums. Otherwise let A,B be the compact coordinate projections of its support. Take nonnegative smooth compact bumps in the two coordinate spaces from F1 and divide each by its positive finite Riemann integral. Denote them by ρ,σ; positivity follows since each is one on a ball, and finiteness from bounded compact support. Fix radii Rρ,Rσ containing their supports. Choose ε0>0 such that A+B(0,ε0Rρ)U and B+B(0,ε0Rσ)V, possible by compact interior margins. These two compact neighborhoods form the fixed support product L.

givenF1F2F5
2.1

For 0<εε0 form the Riemann integral [step 1.1, F2, F3, F4, F5] Iε(x,y)=Φ(a,b)ρε(xa)σε(yb)dadb. A fixed box containing suppΦ bounds the parameter integral. On any fixed compact target box, take uniform parameter grids with midpoint tags. For every mixed target derivative Dγ, differentiating the corresponding finite sums gives the tagged sums for the Dγ-derivative of the integrand. Joint uniform continuity on the compact parameter-target product makes these sums converge uniformly in (x,y): their error from the derivative-integral candidate is at most the parameter-box volume times the largest oscillation on a grid cell. The tagged-sum theorem in F5 identifies the pointwise candidate with the Riemann integral, and repeated applications of F3 on coordinate intervals identify it with DγIε. Thus Iε is smooth and supported in L.

Applying F4 in the two coordinate blocks and then F5 gives Iε(x,y)=Φ(xεs,yεt)ρ(s)σ(t)dsdt. The same uniform tagged-sum argument, now on the fixed support box of ρσ, gives for each mixed derivative DγIε(x,y)=DγΦ(xεs,yεt)ρ(s)σ(t)dsdt. [step 1.1, F2, F3, F4, F5]

3.1

The product kernel has Riemann integral one by F5, is nonnegative and has fixed bounded support. Uniform continuity of the globally smooth compactly supported DγΦ therefore bounds supDγIεDγΦ by its modulus of continuity at εRρ2+Rσ2, tending to zero. Uniform continuity on all space follows from uniform continuity on a compact neighborhood of its support and vanishing outside it. This proves convergence of every derivative as ε0.

step 2.1F5
4.1

Put P0=0. For j1, set εj=ε0/(j+1) and, for the original (a,b)-integral in step 2.1, take uniform product grids with midpoint tags in the fixed parameter box. Each tagged sum has the separated form CCΦ(aC,bC)ρεj(xaC)σεj(ybC). Terms with zero coefficient are omitted. Every remaining tag is in the nonzero set of Φ, so its factor supports lie in the two fixed compact neighborhoods defining L, even if the parameter box itself is not contained in U×V. For each j1, choose the least grid level for which the error from Iεj in all target derivatives of total order at most j is less than 1/j. Such a level exists by the uniform derivative convergence of those tagged sums established in step 2.1. The least-level rule is a defined integer, with no countable choice. Call the resulting finite product sum Pj.

step 3.1step 2.1F2F5
5.1

For fixed γ, the difference Dγ(PjΦ) is bounded, for jmax(1,γ), by 1/j+supDγ(IεjΦ), which tends to zero by step 3.1. All supports are in L, so F6 gives PjΦ in D(U×V). If either domain is empty only the zero test occurs, covered in step 1.1. All integrations were of continuous compactly supported Riemann integrands and all grids were specified, so no choice axiom entered.

step 4.1step 3.1step 1.1F6

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

56 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources