How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Test function cutoffs and euclidean localization
Statement
In ZF, for compact with open, there is with and on a neighborhood of . Every open cover of admits an at most countable locally finite smooth partition of unity with compact supports, each support contained in some cover member. Subordination here asserts existence of such a member for each support; it does not select cover labels.
Facts & Assumptions
The explicit smooth cutoff equals one on the closed unit ball, vanishes outside the radius-two ball, and satisfies ; translated dilates have the stated derivative scaling (Explicit compactly supported smooth cutoffs).
Smoothness and multi-index notation are as in maps and multi-index derivative notation in Euclidean space, applied componentwise.
Proof
Given: the compact set and open set of the first assertion; an open cover of for the second.
For each point of , there is a rational center and positive rational such that the point belongs to and . These inner balls cover , so a finite list suffices by compactness. Put and . Then is smooth, lies in , equals one on the union of the inner balls, and has support in the finite union of the compact outer balls inside . For take the empty product and .
For nonempty , set for , interpreting distance to the empty set as infinity; set . These are compact subsets of , , and their interiors cover . Closedness follows from continuity of distance (its absolute difference is at most the distance of the two points), and boundedness gives compactness. The shell is compact and lies in the open set .
Fix an enumeration of rational center/radius pairs and a coding of finite lists by natural numbers. For each , consider pairs with and with this closed ball contained in some . Their inner balls cover : at any shell point openness of and of one cover member gives a sufficiently small ball, then a rational center and radius. Compactness gives a finite subcover. Select the least code of a finite list that covers , taking the empty list for an empty shell. This is a specified function of , not Countable Choice.
Form the corresponding translated dilates of F1. Their supports lie in , and each support lies in some cover member. This family is locally finite: a point has a neighborhood inside some , and supports with miss , while only finitely many balls occur at each of the finitely many earlier stages. Every point belongs to some shell, so is everywhere positive. The sum is locally finite and smooth; hence are smooth, nonnegative, have compact support in the same outer balls, and sum to one. The double index is countable. For empty use the empty family. These constructions choose no cover labels and no arbitrary sequence of witnesses.
Depends on
Used by
- Smooth functions are weakly dense in distributions Corollary
- Not every distribution is a locally integrable function Counterexample
- Pointwise convergent functions need not converge as distributions without local control Counterexample
- Convolution of distributions when one has compact support Definition
- Compactly supported distributions have global finite order Example
- Compact support continuous primitive representation Lemma
- Compactly supported distributions extend to smooth functions Lemma
- Convolution of distributions is well defined under the support hypothesis Lemma
- Distribution pairing with smooth parameter families Lemma
- Finite sums of product tests are dense on product open sets Lemma
- A distribution with zero derivatives on a connected open set is constant Theorem
- Associativity of distribution convolution under compact support Theorem
- Compactly supported distributions have global finite order Theorem
- Distributional differentiation is continuous and commutes Theorem
- Distributions form a sheaf Theorem
- Distributions supported at one point Theorem
- Global locally finite structure of distributions Theorem
- Local structure of distributions as derivatives of continuous functions Theorem
- Locally integrable functions embed in distributions Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
10 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Semyon Dyatlov, Lecture notes for 18.155 (2022) (standard reference, not scraped)