Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let n1, let Sn1Rn be the unit sphere, and let σ be the set function of The polar surface set function on the unit sphere. Then σ is a finite Borel measure on Sn1, and for every Borel measurable f:Rn[0,], Rnf(x)dλn(x)=0Sn1f(rω)rn1dσ(ω)dr. Moreover, σ is the unique Borel measure on Sn1 with this property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a positive integer n, and a Borel measurable function f:Rn[0,].

[L1]

The set function σ is defined by σ(E)=nλn({rω:ωE, 0<r1}) for Borel ESn1. (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere)

[L3]

Two measures that agree on a sigma-finite generating pi-system agree on the generated sigma-algebra. (Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system)

[L4]

Tonelli's theorem turns equality of measures on sets into the corresponding equality of nonnegative integrals. (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product)

[L5]

Assuming countable choice, bounded subsets of Euclidean space have finite outer measure. (Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of Rn has finite outer measure)

[A1]

Let Φ:Rn{0}(0,)×Sn1 be Φ(x)=(x,x/x). This map is continuous, so m(B):=λn(Φ1(B)) defines a measure on the Borel subsets of (0,)×Sn1.

[A2]

Sets of the form (a,b]×E with 0<a<b and Borel ESn1 form a sigma-finite generating pi-system for the Borel sigma-algebra of (0,)×Sn1.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For Borel ESn1 put Er:={sω:ωE, 0<sr}. By [A1], each Er is Borel. If (Ej) is pairwise disjoint, then the sets (Ej)1 are pairwise disjoint and (jEj)1=j(Ej)1, so countable additivity of λn makes σ a Borel measure. It is finite because σ(Sn1)=nλn({x:0<x1})< by [L5].

L1L5A1
2.1

For Borel ESn1 and 0<a<b, [L1] gives λn(E1)=σ(E)/n. The dilation xrx has determinant rn, so [L2] gives λn(Er)=rnλn(E1)=rnnσ(E). Therefore m((a,b]×E)=λn(EbEa)=bnannσ(E)=σ(E)abrn1dr.

L1L2A1step 1.1
3.1

Step 2.1 shows that m and the product measure rn1dr×σ agree on the generating pi-system of [A2]. Both are sigma-finite there, so [L3] implies that they agree on every Borel subset of (0,)×Sn1. Applying [L4] to this measure identity gives the stated polar-coordinate integral formula for every nonnegative Borel measurable f. If σ~ is another Borel measure on Sn1 with the same integral formula, apply that formula to 1E1, where E1={rω:ωE, 0<r1}. Then λn(E1)=0Sn11E1(rω)rn1dσ~(ω)dr=σ~(E)01rn1dr=σ~(E)n, so σ~(E)=nλn(E1)=σ(E) by [L1]. Thus σ~=σ, proving uniqueness.

A2L3L4step 1.1step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources