How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let , let be the unit sphere, and let be the set function of The polar surface set function on the unit sphere. Then is a finite Borel measure on , and for every Borel measurable , Moreover, is the unique Borel measure on with this property.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a positive integer , and a Borel measurable function .
The set function is defined by for Borel . (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere)
Linear dilations scale Lebesgue measure by the determinant. (A linear map of sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with when is invertible and Lebesgue null when it is not)
Two measures that agree on a sigma-finite generating pi-system agree on the generated sigma-algebra. (Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system)
Tonelli's theorem turns equality of measures on sets into the corresponding equality of nonnegative integrals. (Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product)
Assuming countable choice, bounded subsets of Euclidean space have finite outer measure. (Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of has finite outer measure)
Let be . This map is continuous, so defines a measure on the Borel subsets of .
Sets of the form with and Borel form a sigma-finite generating pi-system for the Borel sigma-algebra of .
Proof
For Borel put . By [A1], each is Borel. If is pairwise disjoint, then the sets are pairwise disjoint and , so countable additivity of makes a Borel measure. It is finite because by [L5].
For Borel and , [L1] gives . The dilation has determinant , so [L2] gives Therefore
Step 2.1 shows that and the product measure agree on the generating pi-system of [A2]. Both are sigma-finite there, so [L3] implies that they agree on every Borel subset of . Applying [L4] to this measure identity gives the stated polar-coordinate integral formula for every nonnegative Borel measurable . If is another Borel measure on with the same integral formula, apply that formula to , where . Then so by [L1]. Thus , proving uniqueness.
Depends on
- The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
- The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}
- On Borel subsets of R^{m+n}, the product lambda_m times lambda_n agrees with lambda_{m+n}
- Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product
- A linear map $T$ of $\mathbb{R}^n$ sends Lebesgue measurable sets to Lebesgue measurable sets, with $\lambda_n(T[E])=|\det T|\,\lambda_n(E)$ when $T$ is invertible and $T[E]$ Lebesgue null when it is not
- Measures agreeing on a generating pi-system are equal under an increasing finite-measure exhaustion from that pi-system
- Lebesgue measure is sigma-finite, and every metrically bounded subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ has finite outer measure
- Pi-systems
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
72 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Theorem 2.49 (standard reference, not scraped)