How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Morrey's inequality has no endpoint
Statement refuted
Assume Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Let and let . There are no constants and with that is, Morrey's inequality has no endpoint at . The witness is which lies in but has no bounded representative. The hypothesis in Morrey's inequality is therefore essential.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice; ; the unit ball ; and the function defined by for and .
Polar coordinates: for nonnegative Borel , with (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, The polar surface set function on the unit sphere).
consists of the classes whose first weak derivatives exist as classes; consists of almost-everywhere classes (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The space as the quotient by null functions).
Holder's inequality with conjugate exponents on and Tonelli's theorem (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases); a function with finite global -Holder seminorm on the bounded ball is bounded, since fixing gives .
Countable Choice is assumed; the fundamental theorem (If is differentiable with integrable then ; and a bounded derivative makes Lipschitz) gives integration by parts on smooth one-dimensional sections, and Fubini (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability) integrates those identities. Classical smooth derivatives are weak derivatives (Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives).
Counterexample
Membership in . Off the origin is smooth and radial with For , this is at most , so polar coordinates [F1] give where and . On , the exact derivative is bounded by , since , , and ; hence its th-power polar integral on this annulus is finite as well. Also : near , , so the radial majorant is , which is integrable for , and is bounded on . To identify the weak gradient, fix a test and a coordinate . For every transverse coordinate other than the zero vector, the coordinate line avoids the origin; its intersection with is an interval on which is smooth, and vanishes near the endpoints. The fundamental theorem applied to gives on that line. The omitted transverse singleton is null because ; both integrands are globally integrable since . Fubini [F5] therefore integrates the section identities into the weak derivative identity. Thus is the weak gradient and by [F2].
No bounded representative. For every the set is a punctured neighbourhood of (since as ) and has positive measure; hence if a measurable equals almost everywhere on , then for every the set has positive measure, so is unbounded on every neighbourhood of . In particular no representative of is bounded, and a fortiori none is uniformly continuous or Holder on .
Failure of every Holder bound. Suppose there were and with for every . Applying this to the class of would produce a representative with for all ; such an is continuous and bounded on the bounded set . But is a representative of , contradicting step 1.2. Hence no such constants exist, Morrey's inequality has no endpoint, and the hypothesis in Morrey's inequality for is essential.
Source notes
The witness is Hunter's Example 3.30 and Kinnunen's Remark 3.16(1), printed at p. 66 and p. 73: the double logarithm is the borderline function whose gradient just fails to be -integrable when is replaced by . The computation above records membership in by splitting at : the logarithmic majorant is integrated only near the origin, and the exact derivative is bounded on the remaining annulus. It also records the absence of any bounded representative; the contradiction with a hypothetical Holder bound is then immediate because Holder functions on a bounded domain are bounded.
Depends on
- Morrey's inequality for $p>n$
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
- Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma
- Local smooth approximation in integer-order Sobolev spaces
- Chain rule for a $C^1$ function with bounded derivative
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability
- If $f : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^m$ is differentiable with integrable $f'$ then $\int_a^b f' = f(b)-f(a)$; and a bounded derivative makes $f$ Lipschitz
- Classical derivatives agree with weak derivatives
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
- W^1,n is not contained in L^∞ Counterexample
Dependency tree · two levels
101 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (Aalto University, 2026, complete graduate lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page two-quarter notes) (standard reference, not scraped)