How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
Definition
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()). Fix and write Let This map is continuous. If is Borel, then is Borel and is Borel in by A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, hence Borel in by The Borel sigma-algebra of a subspace is the trace of the ambient Borel sigma-algebra. It is therefore Lebesgue measurable by Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of is Lebesgue measurable. Define
The next theorem proves that this is a Borel measure on and that it is exactly the surface measure needed for polar coordinates.
Depends on
- The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}
- The Borel sigma-algebra of a subspace is the trace of the ambient Borel sigma-algebra
- Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is Lebesgue measurable
- A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets
- The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Gerald B. Folland, Real Analysis, 2nd ed., Theorem 2.49 (standard reference, not scraped)