Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The critical Sobolev embedding into every finite Lq

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let n≥2 and let Ω⊆Rn be nonempty, open, bounded and a W1,p-extension domain for every p∈(n/2,n) (the extension operator may depend on p). For every 1≤q<∞ there is C(n,q,Ω) with ∥u∥Lq(Ω)≤C(n,q,Ω)∥u∥W1,n(Ω)(u∈W1,n(Ω;K)); that is, W1,n(Ω)↪Lq(Ω) continuously for every finite q. The constant necessarily blows up as q→∞, so no L∞ bound is asserted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Choice; n≥2; a bounded nonempty open set Ω that is a W1,p-extension domain for every p∈(n/2,n), with the operator allowed to depend on p (Sobolev extension domains and extension operators); 1≤q<∞; and a class u∈W1,n(Ω;K).

[F1]

Holder's inequality on the finite measure set Ω: for 1≤a≤b<∞, ∥w∥La(Ω)≤∣Ω∣1/a−1/b∥w∥Lb(Ω) (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).

[F2]

Subcritical Sobolev embedding: for 1≤p<n and p≤r≤p∗=npn−p, ∥w∥Lr(Ω)≤C(n,p,r,Ω)∥w∥W1,p(Ω) on a bounded extension domain (Sobolev embedding on bounded extension domains for p<n).

[F3]

W1,n consists of the Ln classes with all first weak derivatives in Ln, and the Sobolev norm is the ℓn norm of the component Ln norms (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The space Lp(μ) as the quotient by null functions, The Sobolev conjugate exponent and the scaling identity).

[F4]

If B(a,2R)‾⊂Ω, there is η∈Cc∞(B(a,2R)) equal to 1 on B(a,R) (A Euclidean bump for a compact set inside an open set). Polar coordinates give the radial integral formula (Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma, The polar surface set function on the unit sphere), and weak derivatives are defined by integration by parts against compactly supported smooth tests (Weak derivative of a locally integrable function).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1F1F3givenalgebra

The case q≤n. By [F1] with a=q and b=n, ∥u∥Lq(Ω)≤∣Ω∣1/q−1/n∥u∥Ln(Ω)≤∣Ω∣1/q−1/n∥u∥W1,n(Ω).

1.2F1F2F3givenalgebra

The case q>n. Put s:=nqn+q. Then n/2<s<n and s∗=nsn−s=q by [F3]. By the domain hypothesis, Ω is a W1,s-extension domain, so the subcritical embedding [F2] with p=s and r=q=s∗ gives ∥u∥Lq(Ω)≤C(n,s,q,Ω)∥u∥W1,s(Ω). Holder [F1] applied to each component with a=s<b=n gives ∥Dαu∥Ls≤∣Ω∣1/s−1/n∥Dαu∥Ln for ∣α∣≤1; summing over the finitely many multi-indices yields ∥u∥W1,s(Ω)≤C(∣Ω∣,n,s)∥u∥W1,n(Ω). Combining the two estimates proves the case q>n; since s=nq/(n+q), the resulting constant depends only on n,q,Ω.

2.1F3F4step 1.1step 1.2givenalgebra∎

Conclusion. Steps 1.1 and 1.2 cover q≤n and q>n, so every finite q is covered with a constant depending only on n,q,Ω. To see that these constants cannot remain bounded as q→∞, choose a∈Ω and R>0 with B(a,2R)‾⊂Ω, and choose η as in [F4]. Define w(x)=η(x)log⁡log⁡(1+R/∣x−a∣) for x≠a, assigning any finite value at a. If r=∣x−a∣≤R/2, then ∣Dlog⁡log⁡(1+R/r)∣=Rr(r+R)log⁡(1+R/r)≤1rlog⁡(R/r). Thus polar coordinates [F4] give ∫B(a,R/2)∣Dw∣n dx≤C∫0R/2drr(log⁡(R/r))n<∞ for n≥2; also w∈Ln near a because log⁡log⁡(1+R/r)=O(r−1/2) and the polar Ln integral of r−1/2 converges for n≥2, and on the rest of its compact support w is smooth with bounded derivatives. For every coordinate line with nonzero transverse displacement from a, w is smooth and compactly supported on that line. Apply the fundamental theorem (If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz) to w times a test function. The transverse singleton of excluded lines is null since n≥2, and w,Dw∈Ln⊆L1 on their bounded support. Fubini (Tonelli and Fubini for the completed product, with only almost-everywhere section measurability) therefore integrates the section identities to the weak derivative identity, proving w∈W1,n(Ω). It is essentially unbounded on every neighbourhood of a: for every M>0 it exceeds M on a punctured ball about a, so EM has positive measure. If qj→∞ and admissible constants satisfied C(qj)≤C∗, then for each M>0, the set EM={x:∣w(x)∣>M} has positive measure and C∗∥w∥W1,n(Ω)≥∥w∥Lqj(Ω)≥M∣EM∣1/qj. Letting j→∞ gives C∗∥w∥W1,n≥M for every M, a contradiction. Hence the best constants necessarily diverge as q→∞, and no L∞ endpoint is asserted.

Source notes

Kinnunen's Remark 3.16 and Hunter's discussion at p=n record the critical embedding W1,n↪Lq for finite q and the failure of the L∞ endpoint. The proof above reduces q>n to the subcritical embedding with source exponent s=nq/(n+q)∈(n/2,n) and uses Holder on the finite measure domain to compare W1,s with W1,n. The all-exponents hypothesis supplies exactly this W1,s extension operator for each finite q>n; the case q≤n is direct Holder.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

87 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources