How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Sobolev embedding on bounded extension domains for
Statement
Assume the Axiom of Choice (The Axiom of Choice). Let , let be a bounded -extension domain with a bounded extension operator , and let , . Then continuously:
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Axiom of Choice; ; a bounded extension domain with a bounded extension operator and operator norm (Sobolev extension domains and extension operators); ; ; a field .
For , the whole-space Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality holds (The Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality for ). For , compactly supported smooth density (Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)) extends The p=1 Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality to : the smooth estimate on differences gives an Cauchy sequence, completeness gives its limit, and successive almost-everywhere subsequences in that space and in identify the limit with the Sobolev class (Riesz-Fischer completeness of for , Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences). Thus for every (The Sobolev conjugate exponent and the scaling identity).
The transfer corollary: if is a whole-space functional with and , then for all in (Whole-space inequalities transfer through a Sobolev extension).
Holder's inequality gives the interpolation bound whenever and , on a finite measure set (Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases).
consists of classes with weak gradient in , and (Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms, The space as the quotient by null functions); every bounded domain supplies an admissible extension operator through the extension theorem (Bounded C^k domains admit integer-order Sobolev extension).
Proof
The endpoint . Apply the transfer corollary [F2] with , which satisfies the two hypotheses by [F1], enlarging by the finite-dimensional comparison between the Euclidean gradient and the coordinate Sobolev norm: and, since restricts to almost everywhere, . Hence .
Intermediate exponents. For write with (at take , at take ). By [F3], using from [F4] and step 1.1; the case is the same inequality with .
The constant and the domain class. The constant obtained depends only on and , hence only on for a fixed extension domain; every bounded domain, , supplies an admissible through [F4], so the embedding applies in particular to that class.
Source notes
The endpoint case is the whole-space Sobolev inequality transferred through a bounded extension operator, Kinnunen's Theorem 3.43 (printed pp. 84–85) and Definition 3.42; the intermediate exponents are the standard Holder interpolation between and on the finite measure set . The constant is not asserted to be uniform over all extension domains, matching the transfer corollary's dependence on .
Depends on
- The Axiom of Choice
- The Sobolev conjugate exponent and the scaling identity
- Integer-order Sobolev spaces and their norms
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- Sobolev extension domains and extension operators
- The Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality for $1<p<n$
- Whole-space inequalities transfer through a Sobolev extension
- Bounded C^k domains admit integer-order Sobolev extension
- Holder's inequality for integrals, including the endpoint cases
- The p=1 Gagliardo-Nirenberg-Sobolev inequality
- Compactly supported smooth functions are dense in W^{k,p}(R^n)
- Riesz-Fischer completeness of $L^p$ for $1 \le p \le \infty$
- Complex Lp completeness and almost-everywhere subsequences
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
65 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Juha Kinnunen, Sobolev Spaces (Aalto University, 2026, complete graduate lecture notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- John K. Hunter, Notes on Partial Differential Equations (UC Davis, revised 18 June 2014, complete 242-page two-quarter notes) (standard reference, not scraped)