How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Harnack inequality for nonnegative weak solutions
Statement
Assume Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice. Let , let be open, let and be as in De Giorgi local boundedness of homogeneous subsolutions, and let with . Let satisfy a.e. and be a weak solution of , i.e. Then for every ball with , independent of and ; in the homogeneous case this is , the Harnack inequality. For every finite is allowed. The two essential extrema are taken over the same ball, so no regularity of is needed for the statement; the additive forcing term is essential and the estimate is not claimed without it.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice; an open set , ; uniformly elliptic measurable symmetric coefficients with constants ; the principal operator with form ; a source , ; a nonnegative with for every real ; a ball with .
Both roles of a local solution: the identity against real compactly supported smooth tests gives both the subsolution inequality and the supersolution inequality for the equation , with the appropriate inequality directions (Weak subsolutions and supersolutions of a divergence-form equation, Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Local boundedness with a scale-correct source: for every ball , every and every , for every nonnegative weak subsolution of with , where (De Giorgi local boundedness with a scale-correct forcing term).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Weak Harnack inequality: for every ball with and every when , or every finite when , for every nonnegative weak supersolution of with , where ; the range contains , where is produced by the Moser iteration (Weak Harnack inequality for nonnegative supersolutions, Moser iteration for positive supersolutions: negative-power and logarithmic comparison).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. Averaging and the elementary comparison of the negative part of the source: , and (The average of a locally integrable function over a Euclidean ball, The space as the quotient by null functions, The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure).
Assume the Axiom of Choice. The substitute: the critical embedding for every finite replaces the embedding in both quoted theorems (The Sobolev inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on open sets, The critical Sobolev embedding into every finite ).
Proof
The forcing source in the subsolution role. By [F1] the solution is a nonnegative weak subsolution with source , whose positive part is ; by [F4], .
Chaining local boundedness with the weak Harnack inequality. Fix from [F3], which is an admissible weak-Harnack exponent in both the and ranges, and apply local boundedness [F2] to on with . Its source term satisfies by [F4]. Apply weak Harnack [F3] to the supersolution on the same ball with and ; after converting the normalized mean to the stated norm, , where . Substituting this bound into the local estimate gives coefficient on the infimum and on the source term; thus works for both and depends only on .
The homogeneous case and the clause. If the same two steps give , the Harnack inequality; the extremal balls agree, so no regularity is used. For the same proof applies with [F5] in place of the embedding in both quoted theorems and with every finite , so the range becomes unbounded. All arguments use Countable Choice and the Axiom of Choice only through the suppliers named above.
Depends on
- De Giorgi local boundedness with a scale-correct forcing term
- Weak Harnack inequality for nonnegative supersolutions
- Moser iteration for positive supersolutions: negative-power and logarithmic comparison
- Weak subsolutions and supersolutions of a divergence-form equation
- Uniformly elliptic divergence-form operators and their sesquilinear forms
- De Giorgi local boundedness of homogeneous subsolutions
- The average of a locally integrable function over a Euclidean ball
- The space $L^p(\mu)$ as the quotient by null functions
- The essential supremum of a measurable function with respect to a measure
- The Sobolev inequality for zero-boundary Sobolev closures on open sets
- The critical Sobolev embedding into every finite $L^q$
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- The Axiom of Choice
Used by
- The global Harnack comparison needs connectedness Counterexample
- The Harnack estimate needs an additive forcing term Counterexample
- The Harnack inequality requires nonnegativity Counterexample
- The essential supremum precedes the Holder representative in De Giorgi theory Example
- A finite interior ball chain propagates weak Harnack bounds Lemma
Dependency tree · two levels
85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Brian Krummel, DeGiorgi-Nash lecture notes (15 March 2016; complete 9-page notes) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Leon Simon, Lectures on Partial Differential Equations (Stanford University; complete author scan, 118 sheets reproducing the 223 printed pages of the manuscript, two logical pages per sheet) (standard reference, not scraped)
- Brian Krummel, Consequences of De Giorgi-Nash-Moser (4 March 2016; complete 7-page notes) (standard reference, not scraped)