How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Bishop gromov ratio is constant in the model space
Example
Assume the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice . Let and , and let be a complete, connected, simply connected Riemannian -manifold of constant sectional curvature ; when take to be the round sphere , the simply connected space form of positive curvature . Then for every and every radius the open metric ball has the saturated model volume and consequently the Bishop–Gromov ratio is equal to at every positive radius. The ratio is thus constant in ; for this constancy continues past the spherical endpoint , where the numerator and the saturated denominator both saturate. The standard realizations are the round sphere for , Euclidean -space for and hyperbolic -space for ; for the computation below applies to every complete, connected, simply connected constant-curvature- manifold, not only to the named realization.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The inherited of [A1]; the dimension ; the curvature ; a complete, connected, simply connected Riemannian -manifold of constant sectional curvature , equal to the round sphere when ; a point ; a radius ; the unit sphere ; the polar surface measure ; the radial geodesics with cut times ; the radial Jacobi tensor of and the radial volume Jacobian ; and the model functions , , and .
The countable-choice premise is the inherited (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()), carried by the cut-time, polar-integration, Cartan–Hadamard and Hopf–Rinow interfaces below; no further selection is made.
Polar integration (Polar integration may discard the cut locus): is complete, connected and boundaryless, is the finite Borel measure on obtained by transporting the polar surface measure of the unit sphere, and for every Borel , where is the matrix of the radial Jacobi fields in a parallel orthonormal frame, with for .
Radial Jacobi tensor and radial volume Jacobian (Radial Jacobi tensor, Radial volume jacobian): for in the normal space the map is the unique Jacobi field along with and ; in the parallel identification one has for , and in the notation of [F1]. Moreover .
Model fields and comparison functions (Model jacobi fields in positive zero and negative curvature, Model functions solve the constant curvature jacobi equation, Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions, Constant sectional curvature and space form): on a Riemannian manifold of constant sectional curvature , the Jacobi field with , satisfies for every , so the radial Jacobi tensor is and its parallel-frame matrix is . The comparison sine is given by , for and for , it is positive on its positive domain for and for , and it satisfies .
Cut time and minimizing initial intervals (Cut time in a unit tangent direction, Minimizing along a geodesic is an initial interval property): , the set is an initial interval, and if is finite then . Hence for every : if there is with , and the initial-interval property gives .
Cartan–Hadamard (Cartan hadamard): a connected, boundaryless, finite-dimensional Riemannian manifold that is complete and has sectional curvature everywhere has a smooth covering map, and if it is in addition simply connected then is a diffeomorphism for every ; in particular is then injective.
Hopf–Rinow (Hopf–Rinow theorem): for a nonempty, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold, metric completeness, geodesic completeness and are equivalent, and then every are joined by a minimizing geodesic: there is with and .
The round sphere (The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature, Round sphere model geometry): for and , the round sphere with its induced metric is complete, has constant sectional curvature , and for every and every unit the cut time is .
Model volumes and the sphere measure (Model space radial area and ball volume, The polar surface set function on the unit sphere): with the total surface measure of the unit sphere , the model radial area is , the model ball volume is , and the saturated model volume is for and for . The measure of [F1] is the transport of the polar surface measure of by a linear isometry, hence , the total surface measure being preserved by the bijection.
Borel indicator (The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space): the open ball is an open subset of , hence a Borel set, and the indicator of a Borel set is a Borel function: the preimage of an open subset of under is one of , , or , according to whether the open set contains neither, only , only , or both of the values . All four sets are Borel.
Ricci curvature of a space form of curvature (Distance hessian and laplacian in space forms): such a manifold satisfies ; in particular the Ricci lower bound holds with equality.
Bishop–Gromov comparison (Bishop gromov volume comparison): for a complete, connected, boundaryless of dimension with , the ratio is nonincreasing on with , it is constant on when , and for every .
Verification
Proof technique: direct: the radial Jacobi tensor of a constant-curvature manifold is times parallel transport, so the polar integration formula writes the ball volume as times the integral of the model density cut off at the cut time; the cut time is for by Cartan–Hadamard and for the round sphere, and the saturated model volume reproduces exactly this cutoff.
The radial density of the model. [F2, F3, given] Fix . By [F3], for every the radial field is , so the parallel-frame matrix of is the scalar matrix . Since by [F2], its determinant is and [F2] identifies this determinant with the radial volume Jacobian, , in the notation of [F1].
The cut time of the model in each curvature regime. [F4, F5, F6, F7, given] Let . Suppose first that . Then is complete, connected, boundaryless and simply connected with constant sectional curvature , so [F5] makes a diffeomorphism, in particular injective. Let and . By [F6] there is with and . Injectivity gives , so ; since was arbitrary, the set of [F4] contains every positive time, hence . Suppose now that , so that by the hypothesis of the example; then [F7] gives for every unit . Consequently when and when , for every .
The ball volume as the model integral. [F1, F4, F8, F9, step 1.1, step 1.2, given] Fix the point and the radius . By [F9] the ball is Borel and is a Borel function, so the polar formula [F1] applies to : For the minimizing property of [F4] gives , hence , while step 1.1 gives . Therefore the inner integral equals the extended nonnegative integral a finite real number. By step 1.2 this number depends on only through the case distinction: it equals when and when . Write for this common value. The outer integrand of the polar formula is then the constant , and is a finite measure with by [F8], so
The volume is the saturated model volume. [F8, step 1.2, step 2.1, given] Put By step 2.1 the ball volume is , and by step 1.2 the inner integral is exactly in both cases. Since by [F8], the last equality being the case distinction defining the saturated model volume in [F8]. Moreover : the integrand is continuous and positive on the nondegenerate interval , by the positivity of on its positive domain. The value for is included, since the definition of cuts off at that endpoint.
Unit ratio, saturation and sharpness of the comparison. [F8, F10, F11, step 1.2, step 3.1, given] By step 3.1, for every and every , so the Bishop–Gromov ratio is at every positive radius: it is a constant function of . When and , step 1.2 makes the cutoff independent of , so both and are constant there; this is the saturation clause of [F8] and of the comparison [F11]. Finally, by [F10] the model space satisfies , so the hypotheses of the Bishop–Gromov comparison [F11] hold, and its general conclusion with limit at the origin is attained with equality at every radius: the model space is an equality case of the comparison, and the comparison is sharp. The cases , where , and below, equal to, or above (for ) are all covered by the single cutoff ; the value is excluded, as in the definition of . No choice beyond the inherited [A1] is used: the point, the radial direction , the minimizing geodesic of [F6] and the sphere realization of [F7] are fixed or explicit, and the polar, cut-time, Jacobi, Cartan–Hadamard and Hopf–Rinow interfaces carry exactly .
Source locator
Datar §§27.2 and 28.1, pp.200–209, computes the polar volume element with the model radial density and the model ball volume that the Bishop–Gromov quotient compares with; Eschenburg §§4–5, pp.15–20, introduces the model radial density and its integral. The computation above is carried out on the model space itself: the radial Jacobi tensor is times parallel transport, the cut time is in nonpositive curvature by Cartan–Hadamard and on the round sphere, and the polar formula turns the ball volume into the saturated model volume .
Depends on
- Bishop gromov volume comparison
- Model space radial area and ball volume
- Radial volume jacobian
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
- Polar integration may discard the cut locus
- The polar surface set function on the unit sphere
- The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space
- Radial Jacobi tensor
- Model jacobi fields in positive zero and negative curvature
- Model functions solve the constant curvature jacobi equation
- Comparison sine, cosine and cotangent functions
- Constant sectional curvature and space form
- Cut time in a unit tangent direction
- Minimizing along a geodesic is an initial interval property
- Cartan hadamard
- Hopf–Rinow theorem
- Round sphere model geometry
- The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature
- Distance hessian and laplacian in space forms
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
183 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (2025) (standard reference, not scraped)
- J.-H. Eschenburg, Comparison Theorems in Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)