Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-10-02
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Bonnet-Myers for the round sphere

Example

Assume the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice ACω. Let k>0, let R=1/k, let n≥2, and let SRn={x∈Rn+1:∣x∣=R} carry the Riemannian metric induced from Euclidean Rn+1. Then:

  1. SRn has constant sectional curvature K=1/R2=k, hence Ricci curvature Ric⁡=(n−1)k g;
  2. SRn is complete and has diameter diam⁡(SRn,g)=πR=πk;
  3. it therefore attains the equality case of the Bonnet–Myers bound diam⁡≤π/k: both the Ric lower bound Ric⁡≥(n−1)k g and the diameter bound are equalities.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The inherited ACω of [A1], a real number k>0, the radius R=1/k, an integer n≥2, the round sphere SRn with its induced Riemannian metric g, and the metric diameter diam⁡(SRn,g)=sup⁡p,qdg(p,q).

[A1]

The countable-choice premise is the inherited ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), carried by the sectional-curvature, cut-locus and Hopf–Rinow interfaces cited below; every point and curve below is explicit.

[F1]

The round sphere SRn with the induced metric has constant sectional curvature 1/R2 for n≥2 (The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature); this is the constant-curvature predicate of Constant sectional curvature and space form.

[F2]

Constant curvature: a manifold of constant sectional curvature k has curvature tensor R(X,Y)Z=k(g(Y,Z)X−g(X,Z)Y) (Curvature tensor of constant sectional curvature); the Ricci tensor is Ric⁡(X,Y)=tr⁡(Z↦R(Z,X)Y) (Ricci curvature) and equals ∑iRm⁡(ei,X,Y,ei) in an orthonormal basis (Ricci curvature is symmetric and basis independent), with Rm⁡(A,B,C,D)=g(R(A,B)C,D) and K=Rm⁡(u,v,v,u) for an orthonormal pair (Riemann curvature four-tensor, Sectional curvature).

[F3]

Cut locus of the round sphere: for every p∈SRn and every unit v∈TpSRn the cut time is cp(v)=πR and the cut locus is the antipodal singleton Cut⁡(p)={−p} (Round sphere model geometry); the radial geodesics are the great circles of Great circles as round-sphere geodesics, and for 0<t<cp(v) the radial geodesic is minimizing, dg(p,exp⁡p(tv))=t, by the definition of the cut time (Cut time in a unit tangent direction).

[F4]

A compact boundaryless Riemannian manifold is geodesically complete, and each connected component is metrically complete (Compact Riemannian manifolds are geodesically complete), and geodesic completeness gives metric completeness by Hopf–Rinow; the Riemannian distance makes a connected Riemannian manifold a metric space (Riemannian distance on a connected manifold).

[F5]

Bonnet–Myers: a nonempty, complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold of dimension n≥2 with Ric⁡≥(n−1)k g, k>0, has diam⁡≤π/k (Bonnet myers, Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space).

Verification

Proof technique: direct: the round sphere has constant curvature k, its Ricci tensor is traced from the constant-curvature tensor identity, and the diameter is read off from the cut locus, where the antipode lies at distance πR.

1.1F1given

The round sphere has K=k. [F1, given] By [F1] the sectional curvature is everywhere 1/R2, and R=1/k gives 1/R2=k; in particular K=k>0 and the space is a space form in the sense of [F1].

2.1F2step 1.1

The Ricci curvature is Ric⁡=(n−1)k g. [F2, step 1.1] Let p∈SRn and let (e1,…,en) be an orthonormal basis of TpSRn. By step 1.1 the manifold has constant sectional curvature k, so [F2] gives R(A,B)C=k(g(B,C)A−g(A,C)B) for all tangent vectors. Substituting into the orthonormal-basis formula of [F2], Ric⁡(X,Y)=∑i=1nRm⁡(ei,X,Y,ei)=∑i=1nk(g(X,Y)g(ei,ei)−g(ei,Y)g(X,ei))=k(n g(X,Y)−g(X,Y))=(n−1)k g(X,Y). Hence Ric⁡=(n−1)k g, and in particular the Bonnet–Myers lower bound holds with equality at every point and every tangent vector.

3.1F3F4givenstep 2.1

The sphere is complete and its diameter is π/k. [F3, F4, given, step 2.1] The sphere SRn is a closed and bounded subset of Rn+1, hence compact. It is connected and boundaryless by the round-sphere geometry of [F3], so [F4] makes it complete. Diameter: fix p∈SRn. Every point q∈SRn either is the antipode q=−p or lies outside the cut locus {−p} of [F3]. In the second case the distance formula of Round sphere model geometry gives dg(p,q)<πR, including q=p with distance zero; in the first case the radial geodesic in the direction of v with exp⁡p(πR v)=−p has length πR and is minimizing, because the cut time is exactly πR, so dg(p,−p)=πR. Therefore sup⁡qdg(p,q)=πR, and since p was arbitrary, diam⁡(SRn,g)=πR=πk by the definition of the diameter in [F5].

4.1F5step 2.1step 3.1∎

Equality in Bonnet–Myers, and the boundary cases. [F5, step 2.1, step 3.1] By step 2.1 the sphere satisfies Ric⁡≥(n−1)k g with equality everywhere, and it is complete, connected, boundaryless and of dimension n≥2; [F5] gives diam⁡≤π/k, and step 3.1 gives diam⁡=π/k: the diameter bound is attained, so the example is an equality case of Bonnet–Myers. The case n=2 is included and is the minimal dimension for which the statement and Bonnet–Myers are formulated; the parameter k>0 is essential, since for k=0 the Euclidean space has unbounded pairwise distances and Ricci curvature 0; its diameter is undefined under Bounded subset, diameter, distance from a point to a set, and distance between two sets in a metric space. The radius is normalized to R=1/k so that the curvature is exactly k; for a general radius r the same computation gives K=1/r2 and diameter πr. No choice beyond the inherited [A1] is used: the sphere, its antipodal point and the great circles are explicit.

Source locator

Datar §27.1 and §28.2, pp.199–200 and 210–212, and Eschenburg §12, pp.59–62, present the round sphere of curvature k as the equality case of Myers' diameter bound. The curvature and cut-locus computations are those of the published round-sphere items cited in [F1]–[F3].

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

98 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources