How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Constant sectional curvature and space form
Definition
This item assumes , namely countable choice. In the propagated dependency chain, that assumption is required through Sectional curvature; after those interfaces are fixed, the remaining local or finite argument makes no additional countable-family choice.
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice exactly as in Geodesically complete Riemannian manifold. It is used here only through that supplier's construction of the unique maximal geodesic domains needed to interpret completeness; the constant-curvature predicate itself makes no further family choice beyond the stated inherited assumption.
A Riemannian manifold has constant sectional curvature when every tangent two-plane at every point has sectional curvature . A connected, boundaryless, geodesically complete Riemannian manifold of constant sectional curvature is called a space form on this page.
This global condition is stronger than saying that, at each point , all two-planes have some common value ; Schur's lemma later proves constancy of that pointwise value in connected dimension at least three. In dimensions zero and one there are no tangent two-planes, so the predicate “has constant sectional curvature ” is vacuous for every and does not determine a distinguished number. Under the library convention that the empty space is connected, the empty boundaryless complete manifold is correspondingly a vacuous space form. These low-dimensional conventions do not affect later formulas, whose alternating metric model vanishes in dimensions below two.
Depends on
Used by
- Diameter rigidity from toponogov under a sectional lower bound Corollary
- Lower positive sectional curvature forces conjugate points Corollary
- Upper sectional curvature bounds delay conjugate points Corollary
- Comparison triangle in the two dimensional space form Definition
- Bishop gromov ratio is constant in the model space Example
- Bonnet-Myers for the round sphere Example
- Distance hessian and laplacian in space forms Example
- Equality cases as diagnostics for all comparison signs Example
- Index form in constant curvature Example
- Jacobi fields in constant sectional curvature Example
- Model jacobi fields in positive zero and negative curvature Example
- Rauch comparison between euclidean and spherical geodesics Example
- Toponogov comparison on a round sphere Example
- Higher sectional curvature makes jacobi fields spread faster False statement
- Toponogov distance support inequality Lemma
- Curvature tensor of constant sectional curvature Proposition
- Distance between corresponding side points in toponogov comparison Proposition
- Rigidity in rauch comparison Proposition
- Rauch comparison theorem second form Theorem
- Toponogov hinge comparison Theorem
- Toponogov triangle comparison Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)
- John M. Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature (standard reference, not scraped)