Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Polar integration may discard the cut locus

Statement

Assume exactly the inherited Axiom of Countable Choice ACω (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)), carried by the declared completeness, exponential, cut-time, cut-locus, density and polar-coordinate suppliers. Let (M,g) be a complete, connected, boundaryless, finite-dimensional Riemannian manifold, let p∈M, let vol⁡g be the Riemannian volume measure of Riemannian volume density, and let Cut⁡(p) be the cut locus of Cut point and cut locus of a point. Write SpM={v∈TpM:∣v∣g=1}, let cp:SpM→(0,+∞] be the cut time of Cut time in a unit tangent direction, and write γv(t)=exp⁡p(tv) for the radial geodesic.

(a) Discarding the cut locus. For every Borel f:M→[0,∞], ∫Mf dvol⁡g=∫M∖Cut⁡(p)f dvol⁡g, and the same identity holds for every real or complex Borel f∈L1(vol⁡g), the right-hand side being the integral over the Borel set M∖Cut⁡(p). In dimension zero Cut⁡(p)=∅ and the identity is trivial.

(b) The exponential polar formula. Suppose n:=dim⁡M≥1. Fix v∈SpM, let e1,…,en−1 be an orthonormal basis of the hyperplane v⊥={w∈TpM:gp(v,w)=0}, let E1,…,En−1 be the parallel sections along γv with Ei(0)=ei, and let J1,…,Jn−1 be the Jacobi fields along γv with Ji(0)=0 and DtJi(0)=ei. Put av(t):=(gγv(t)(Ji(t),Ej(t)))1≤i,j≤n−1,t≥0. Then det⁡av(t) does not depend on the choice of the orthonormal basis e1,…,en−1 of v⊥, the inequality det⁡av(t)>0 holds for every 0<t<cp(v), and for n=1 the matrix is empty with det⁡av(t)=1 by the empty-determinant convention. Let σp be the polar surface measure transported to SpM from the unit sphere Sn−1⊆Rn by a linear isometry (TpM,gp)→Rn (The polar surface set function on the unit sphere); σp is a finite Borel measure on SpM and does not depend on the chosen isometry. Then for every Borel f:M→[0,∞], ∫Mf dvol⁡g=∫SpM∫0cp(v)f(γv(t))det⁡av(t) dt dσp(v), where the inner integral is the extended nonnegative integral over the open interval (0,cp(v)), and in particular the right-hand side is the integral of f over M∖({p}∪Cut⁡(p)). For n=1 the empty determinant is 1, so the formula reads ∫Mf dvol⁡g=∫SpM∫0cp(v)f(γv(t)) dt dσp(v). The polar identity is asserted only for n≥1: in dimension zero SpM=∅, so its right-hand side is 0, while vol⁡g is counting measure and need not vanish on M; that counting case is recorded separately (part (a) above is still valid there, since Cut⁡(p)=∅).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice ACω; a complete, connected, boundaryless, finite-dimensional Riemannian manifold (M,g) of dimension n; a point p∈M; the Riemannian volume measure vol⁡g; and the cut time cp, the unit sphere SpM and the cut locus Cut⁡(p).

[F1]

The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω): The Axiom of Countable Choice is the assumed choice principle; it is inherited through the declared suppliers and is spent only where those suppliers spend it.

[F2]

Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold and Pointwise norm and angle from a riemannian metric: Each tangent space TxM carries the positive definite inner product gx, and ∣w∣g=gx(w,w) is the associated norm, so that SpM={w∈TpM:∣w∣g=1} consists of the unit vectors.

[F3]

Cut time in a unit tangent direction and Cut point and cut locus of a point: γv(t)=exp⁡p(tv) for v∈SpM; cp(v)=sup⁡{t>0:dg(p,exp⁡p(tv))=t}∈(0,+∞]; Cut⁡(p)={exp⁡p(cp(v)v):v∈SpM, cp(v)<+∞}; and Dp={tv:v∈SpM, 0<t<cp(v)}. In dimension zero SpM=∅ and Cut⁡(p)=∅.

[F4]

Cut locus of a point has riemannian volume zero: vol⁡g(Cut⁡(p))=0. No compactness of M is needed for this.

[F5]

The cut locus of a point is closed and The Borel sigma-algebra of a topological space: Cut⁡(p) is closed in M, hence a Borel set, because the Borel sigma-algebra is generated by the open sets and is closed under complements; consequently M∖Cut⁡(p) is Borel as well.

[F6]

The exponential map is a diffeomorphism on the open tangent cut domain: Dp is open in TpM, the set U:=M∖({p}∪Cut⁡(p)) is an open submanifold of M, and exp⁡p∣Dp:Dp→U is a diffeomorphism onto U. No compactness is assumed.

[F7]

Hopf–Rinow theorem: On the complete connected manifold (M,g) the exponential domain of every fibre is all of TpM, so every vector tv with t≥0 and v∈SpM lies in the exponential domain.

[F8]

Geodesic of an affine connection and Geodesics have constant speed for a metric-compatible connection: Dtγ˙v=0 along γv and ∣γ˙v(t)∣g=1 for all t, so γv is a unit-speed geodesic.

[F9]

Existence and uniqueness of parallel sections, Parallel section along a curve and Levi civita parallel transport preserves lengths angles and volume: For every initial vector e∈TpM there is exactly one parallel section E along γv with E(0)=e on the whole interval [0,∞), and parallel transport preserves inner products. Hence if e1,…,en−1 is an orthonormal basis of v⊥ and Ei is the parallel section with Ei(0)=ei, then E1(t),…,En−1(t) is an orthonormal frame of γ˙v(t)⊥: it is orthonormal because γ˙v is parallel of unit length by [F8] and gp(ei,v)=0, and it spans the (n−1)-dimensional orthogonal complement.

[F10]

Existence and uniqueness of jacobi fields from initial data, Jacobi field and The space of Jacobi fields along a geodesic has dimension two n: For every a≥0 and every x,y∈Tγv(a)M there is exactly one Jacobi field along γv with J(a)=x and DtJ(a)=y, and the set J(γv) of Jacobi fields along γv is a real vector space of dimension 2n. In particular the fields Ji with Ji(0)=0 and DtJi(0)=ei exist and are unique, and a Jacobi field with vanishing initial value and vanishing initial derivative is identically zero.

[F11]

Differential of the exponential map in terms of Jacobi fields: For v∈Ep and w∈TpM, the Jacobi field J along s↦exp⁡p(sv) with J(0)=0 and DsJ(0)=w satisfies J(s)=d(exp⁡p)sv(sw) for 0≤s≤1; in particular d(exp⁡p)v(w)=J(1). By [F7] this applies to every v∈TpM.

[F12]

Gauss lemma: For w∈TpM (with w∈Ep, which by [F7] is automatic) and z∈TpM, gexp⁡p(w)(d(exp⁡p)w(w),d(exp⁡p)w(z))=gp(w,z).

[F13]

Riemannian volume density, The riemannian volume density is coordinate independent and Riemannian volume is the radon measure of the riemannian density: vol⁡g is the Borel measure μg of the Riemannian volume density, which is a compact-finite, locally finite and sigma-finite Radon measure; in any chart x with metric matrix G the coordinate coefficient of the density is det⁡G, a positive smooth function, and in dimension zero this coefficient is 1, so that vol⁡g is counting measure.

[F14]

Intrinsic density measure and its chart restriction: For a nonnegative Borel density r and every chart y:V→y(V), the associated Borel measure μr satisfies μr(E)=∫y(E)ry dλn for every Borel E⊆V, and all chart-gluing constructions give the same measure.

[F15]

Measurable integration extends smooth density integration and Countable partition construction of the Borel set function: For a nonnegative Borel density r and any chart partition (xi,φi), ∫Mf dμr=∑i∫xi(Ui)(φifr)xi dλn for every nonnegative Borel f:M→[0,∞] and, through real and imaginary positive and negative parts, for every Borel f∈L1(μr). The gluing data of the definition consist of a countable locally finite chart cover (Ui,xi) and a subordinate smooth partition (φi) with φi≥0, supp⁡φi⊆Ui and ∑iφi=1; a one-member family consisting of a single chart and the constant function 1 satisfies these conditions, its support condition and local finiteness being immediate.

[F16]

An open subset of a smooth manifold has a canonical restricted smooth structure, Smooth manifolds and their smooth charts and Diffeomorphisms and local diffeomorphisms of manifolds: Every point of M lies in a smooth chart, an open subset of a smooth manifold carries a canonical structure of smooth manifold making it an open submanifold, and a diffeomorphism is a bijective smooth map with smooth inverse.

[F17]

Polar coordinates decompose Lebesgue measure into r^{n-1} dr d sigma and The polar surface set function on the unit sphere: For n≥1 the set function σ(E)=nλn({rω:ω∈E, 0<r≤1}) is a finite Borel measure on Sn−1, and for every nonnegative Borel h:Rn→[0,∞], ∫Rnh dλn=∫0∞∫Sn−1h(tω)tn−1 dσ(ω) dt.

[F18]

Every finite-dimensional real or complex inner product space has an orthonormal basis, Orthogonal vectors and subspaces, orthogonal and orthonormal sets, and orthonormal bases, Linear isometries and isometric isomorphisms and An isometric embedding is injective and carries the metric topology of the source onto the subspace topology of its image: Every finite-dimensional inner product space has an orthonormal basis; a linear isometry between inner product spaces is injective, and a bijective linear isometry is a homeomorphism onto its target. In particular the coefficient map of an orthonormal basis of (TpM,gp) is a linear isometric isomorphism φ:TpM→Rn with φ(SpM)=Sn−1 and φ−1(Sn−1)=SpM.

[F19]

Lebesgue measure on Rn is invariant under every orthogonal linear map and Orthogonal and unitary operators form groups, and their determinants have modulus one: Lebesgue measure is invariant under every orthogonal operator on Rn, and composites of orthogonal operators are orthogonal. Therefore the polar surface measure σ of [F17] is also invariant under orthogonal operators: σ(OE)=σ(E), because {rω:ω∈OE, 0<r≤1}=O{rω:ω∈E, 0<r≤1}.

[F20]

Measures on sigma-algebras, Measures are monotone and Finite and countable subadditivity of measures: A measure is nonnegative, vanishes on the empty set, is countably additive on pairwise disjoint measurable families, is monotone, and is finitely subadditive.

[F21]

A nonnegative integral over a null set vanishes, Measure-null sets and almost-everywhere statements relative to a measure, Integral over a measurable subset and Closure properties of measurable functions used by the integral: For a measurable f≥0 and a measurable null set E one has ∫Ef dμ=0; the integral over a measurable set is ∫fχE dμ; and sums, scalar multiples, positive parts and products with indicator functions of measurable nonnegative functions are measurable.

[F22]

Additivity of the nonnegative Lebesgue integral: For measurable f,g:X→[0,+∞] on a measure space, ∫(f+g) dμ=∫f dμ+∫g dμ, with values in [0,+∞].

[F23]

Two integrable functions are equal almost everywhere exactly when all of their indefinite integrals agree and Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals: For f,g∈L1(μ), if f=g almost everywhere then ∫Af dμ=∫Ag dμ for every measurable A; integrability is defined through the positive and negative parts of the real and imaginary parts.

[F24]

Every at most countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue null; in particular λ1(Q)=0: For n≥1 every at most countable subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable and λn-null; in particular every singleton is null.

[F25]

The chain rule for differentials of smooth maps, The differential of a smooth map and Smooth maps are continuous: The differential of a composite is the composite of the differentials, the differential is linear in its vector argument, and smooth maps are continuous.

[F26]

For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, det⁡(AB)=det⁡(A)det⁡(B), For every square matrix over a commutative ring, det⁡(AT)=det⁡(A), For n≥1, the determinant over a commutative ring by the Leibniz formula, and ∣det⁡A∣ for a real matrix, The Gram matrix G(v0,…,vr−1)=(⟨vi,vj⟩)i,j<r and Gram determinant, with empty value 1, A Gram determinant is nonnegative and is positive exactly when the vector list is linearly independent and For every fixed finite size at least one, the determinant of a real square matrix is a polynomial in its matrix entries: For square real matrices det⁡(AB)=det⁡Adet⁡B and det⁡(AT)=det⁡A; the determinant is the finite Leibniz sum of products of the entries, hence a polynomial function of them; the Gram matrix of a finite list of vectors has entries g(vi,vj) and its determinant vanishes exactly when the list is linearly dependent and is positive exactly when the list is independent; the empty determinant and the empty Gram determinant are 1.

[F27]

Metric compatible connection on a riemannian vector bundle, Covariant derivative along a curve, The derivative f′(c)=lim⁡x→cf(x)−f(c)x−c of f:A→R at a point c∈A that is a limit point of A, and differentiability on a set and Vector field and section along a smooth curve: The metric pairing along a smooth curve satisfies the product rule (g(V,W))′=g(DtV,W)+g(V,DtW), the coefficients of smooth fields along a curve in a pulled-back frame are smooth functions of the parameter, and differentiability of a real function at a point is the existence of its difference-quotient limit.

[F28]

Sums, scalar multiples, products and quotients of function limits, the quotient under the hypothesis that the denominator limit is nonzero: Limits of real functions at a point respect finite sums, finite products and products by constants.

[F29]

Characterization of a cut point and Conjugate points along a geodesic and their multiplicity: The points γv(0) and γv(t) are conjugate along γv∣[0,t] exactly when there is a nonzero Jacobi field along γv that vanishes at both parameters 0 and t; and if t>0 and this conjugacy holds, then cp(v)≤t.

[F30]

Intermediate value theorem, by bisection with a canonical left-half rule: a continuous function on [a,b] takes every value between f(a) and f(b): A continuous real function on an interval whose values at two points have opposite signs has a zero between them.

[F31]

Tonelli's theorem for nonnegative measurable functions on a sigma-finite product: For sigma-finite measure spaces and a nonnegative product-measurable function, the product integral equals both iterated integrals, and the section integrals are measurable.

[F32]

The Borel product of R^m and R^n is the Borel sigma-algebra of R^{m+n}, The Borel sigma-algebra of a subspace is the trace of the ambient Borel sigma-algebra, A continuous map has Borel preimages of Borel sets, Sums, products, absolute values, finite maxima and minima, and quotients of continuous real-valued maps on a topological space are continuous where defined and A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions: The product Borel sigma-algebra of Rm×Rk is the Borel sigma-algebra of Rm+k; the Borel sigma-algebra of a subspace is the trace; a continuous map pulls Borel sets back to Borel sets; finite products of continuous real functions are continuous; and a map into Rm is continuous exactly when its components are. In particular the map (ω,t)↦tω is continuous on Sn−1×(0,∞) and the product Borel structure there agrees with the trace of B(Rn+1).

[F33]

Every nonnegative measurable function admits an explicit increasing sequence of simple approximations, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions and Monotone convergence for the integral: Every nonnegative measurable function is an increasing limit of nonnegative simple functions, the integral of a simple function is its simple integral, and the nonnegative integral commutes with increasing limits.

Proof

technique · direct. The cut-locus nullity lets the integral be taken over $M\setminus(\{p\}\cup\operatorname{Cut}(p))$; the exponential map is a diffeomorphism there and the Riemannian density in the resulting normal chart is $\sqrt{\det G}$; the Euclidean polar decomposition of Lebesgue measure factors that integral into radial and spherical parts, and Gauss's lemma computes the Gram matrix in an adapted frame so that the radial factor $t^{n-1}$ cancels and the density becomes the Jacobi determinant $\det a_v(t)$
1.1F3F13givencases

Dimension zero. If n=0 then SpM=∅ and Cut⁡(p)=∅ by [F3], so M∖Cut⁡(p)=M and both sides of the identity of (a) are literally the same integral, for [0,∞]-valued and for integrable Borel f alike; and vol⁡g is counting measure by [F13], which is why the polar identity of (b) is not asserted for n=0: there SpM=∅ makes its right-hand side 0, while ∫Mf dvol⁡g can be nonzero. Assume n≥1 from here on.

1.2F17F18F19F33algebra

A linear isometry, the transported sphere measure, and its integral transformation. By [F18] choose an orthonormal basis (e10,…,en0) of (TpM,gp) and let φ:TpM→Rn be its coefficient map φ(∑ixiei0)=(x1,…,xn). This is a single existential instantiation. By [F18], φ is a linear isometric isomorphism and therefore a homeomorphism with φ(SpM)=Sn−1. Define σp(E):=σ(φ(E)) for Borel E⊆SpM, where σ is the polar surface measure of [F17]; since φ is a bijection, this is the image of σ under φ−1, so σp is a Borel measure with σp(SpM)=σ(Sn−1)<∞ by [F17], and the defining formula of an image measure gives, for every nonnegative Borel g:SpM→[0,∞], ∫SpMg dσp=∫Sn−1(g∘φ−1) dσ. Indeed, for g=1E with Borel E⊆SpM both sides are σ(φ(E)), for nonnegative simple g the identity is finite additivity of σ, and for general nonnegative Borel g it follows by increasing simple approximation and monotone convergence [F33]. If φ′:TpM→Rn comes from a second orthonormal basis, then φ′∘φ−1 is orthogonal by [F19], so for every Borel E⊆SpM the orthogonal invariance of σ recorded in [F19] gives σ(φ′(E))=σ((φ′∘φ−1)(φ(E)))=σ(φ(E)); thus σp does not depend on the chosen isometry. Consequently, for every nonnegative Borel G:Sn−1→[0,∞], ∫Sn−1G dσ=∫SpM(G∘φ) dσp, the case g=G∘φ of the displayed identity.

1.3F6F13F16F18F25givenalgebra

The normal chart and its metric matrix. Put Ω:=φ(Dp)⊆Rn∖{0} and U:=M∖({p}∪Cut⁡(p)). By [F6] the set Dp is open and exp⁡p∣Dp:Dp→U is a diffeomorphism onto the open submanifold U, so x:=φ∘(exp⁡p∣Dp)−1:U→Ω is a diffeomorphism onto the open set Ω with inverse x−1(ξ)=exp⁡p(φ−1(ξ)) for ξ∈Ω [F16, F25]. Write cφ(ω):=cp(φ−1(ω)) for ω∈Sn−1; then Ω=φ(Dp)={tω:ω∈Sn−1, 0<t<cφ(ω)}, because φ is linear and φ(SpM)=Sn−1 by [F18]. For ξ∈Ω with w:=φ−1(ξ) let G(ξ) be the metric matrix of the chart x at ξ, Gij(ξ)=gx−1(ξ)(d(exp⁡p)w(ei0),d(exp⁡p)w(ej0)),1≤i,j≤n; this is the matrix of the Riemannian metric in this chart, since by the chain rule [F25] the coordinate frame is ∂i∣ξ=d(x−1)ξ(eistd)=d(exp⁡p)w(ei0). The coefficient of the Riemannian volume density in this chart is det⁡G(ξ), positive and smooth on the open set Ω, by [F13].

1.4F8F9F10F12F26F27F28F29F30algebracases

The Jacobi fields, the frame, and the matrix av. Fix v∈SpM. The Jacobi fields Ji with Ji(0)=0, DtJi(0)=ei and the parallel sections Ei with Ei(0)=ei exist, are unique on all of [0,∞), and are smooth in t, by [F9] and [F10]; moreover E1(t),…,En−1(t) is an orthonormal frame of γ˙v(t)⊥ by [F8] and [F9]. Define aij(t):=gγv(t)(Ji(t),Ej(t)) for t≥0. Since E1(t),…,En−1(t) is an orthonormal basis of γ˙v(t)⊥ and each Ji(t) lies in that subspace by the Gauss lemma [F12] applied with w=tv and z=tei, the expansion in an orthonormal basis gives Ji(t)=∑jaij(t)Ej(t); hence the Gram matrix A(t):=(gγv(t)(Ji(t),Jj(t)))i,j satisfies A(t)=a(t)a(t)T and therefore det⁡A(t)=det⁡(a(t))2 by [F26]. The entries aij are smooth in t by [F27], and the metric product rule [F27] evaluated at t=0, where DtJi(0)=ei, Ji(0)=0, Ej(0)=ej and DtEj=0 by [F9] and [F10], gives aij′(0)=gp(ei,ej)+gp(0,0)=δij. Consequently a(t)=tI+o(t) as t→0+ by the definition of the derivative [F27], so t−1a(t)→I entrywise; the determinant is a finite sum of products of the entries [F26], so the limit rules [F28] give det⁡(t−1a(t))→det⁡I=1, and therefore det⁡a(t)=tn−1det⁡(t−1a(t))>0 for every sufficiently small t>0 (for n=1 the matrix a(t) is empty and det⁡a(t)=1>0 for all t by the empty-determinant convention [F26]). Next, det⁡a(t)≠0 for every 0<t<cp(v): if det⁡a(t)=0, then det⁡A(t)=0, so the list J1(t),…,Jn−1(t) is linearly dependent by [F26]; choose a nonzero coefficient vector (ci) with ∑iciJi(t)=0. The combination J:=∑iciJi is a Jacobi field along γv because J(γv) is a real vector space [F10], it satisfies J(0)=0 and J(t)=0, and it is not the zero field because DtJ(0)=∑iciei≠0 by the independence of the ei and the uniqueness in [F10]. Hence p=γv(0) and γv(t) are conjugate along γv∣[0,t] by [F29], and the conjugacy clause of [F29] gives cp(v)≤t, contradicting t<cp(v). Since t↦det⁡a(t) is continuous on (0,∞) (its entries are smooth [F27]) and has no zero on the interval (0,cp(v)), while it is positive near 0, the intermediate value theorem [F30] shows that det⁡a(t)>0 for every 0<t<cp(v). Finally, det⁡a(t) does not depend on the choice of the orthonormal basis of v⊥: if ei′=∑kOikek with O orthogonal, then uniqueness in [F9] and [F10] gives Ji′=∑kOikJk and Ei′=∑kOikEk, hence a′=OaOT and det⁡a′=det⁡a by [F26].

1.5F4F5F13F14F16F20F21F24algebra

The complement of U is vol⁡g-null. The set Cut⁡(p) is closed by [F5] and vol⁡g(Cut⁡(p))=0 by [F4]. For the singleton, choose a smooth chart (V,y) of M with p∈V, which exists by [F16], and let r be the coefficient of the Riemannian volume density in this chart; then {p} is Borel (singletons are closed in the Hausdorff manifold and closed sets are Borel [F5, F16]), and the chart-restriction formula [F14] applied to the measure vol⁡g=μg of [F13] gives vol⁡g({p})=∫y({p})r dλn=∫{y(p)}r dλn=0, the last equality because {y(p)} is a singleton, hence λn-null by [F24], and integrals of nonnegative functions over null sets vanish by [F21]. Therefore vol⁡g({p}∪Cut⁡(p))≤vol⁡g({p})+vol⁡g(Cut⁡(p))=0 by finite subadditivity [F20], so M∖U={p}∪Cut⁡(p) is a Borel set of vol⁡g-measure zero.

1.6F4F5F21F22algebra

Part (a) for nonnegative integrands. Let C:=Cut⁡(p), a Borel null set by [F4, F5]. For Borel f:M→[0,∞], the functions fχC and fχM∖C are nonnegative Borel [F21] and f=fχC+fχM∖C pointwise, so additivity of the nonnegative integral [F22] gives ∫Mf dvol⁡g=∫MfχC dvol⁡g+∫MfχM∖C dvol⁡g. The first term equals ∫Cf dvol⁡g=0 by the definition of the integral over a measurable set and the null-set theorem [F21], and the second is ∫M∖Cut⁡(p)f dvol⁡g by the same definition. This is the asserted identity.

1.7F4F5F21F23algebra

Part (a) for integrable integrands. Let f∈L1(vol⁡g) be real or complex and Borel, and put C:=Cut⁡(p) and g:=fχM∖C. Then g is Borel with ∣g∣≤∣f∣, so g∈L1(vol⁡g) [F21, F23]; f and g agree outside the null set C, so f=g almost everywhere [F21]; and ∫Mg dvol⁡g=∫M∖Cut⁡(p)f dvol⁡g by the definition of the integral over a measurable set [F21]. The almost-everywhere equality theorem [F23], applied with A=M, gives ∫Mf dvol⁡g=∫Mg dvol⁡g, which is the asserted identity.

1.8F13F14F15F16algebra

The chart formula on U. By [F16] the open set U carries the structure of a smooth manifold and x:U→Ω is a smooth chart of it; the restricted Riemannian metric makes it a Riemannian manifold whose volume density is the restriction of μg, because for a Borel set E⊆U the chart-restriction formula [F14] applied in M and in the open submanifold U gives in both cases the value ∫x(E)det⁡G dλn, the coefficient of the Riemannian density being the same positive function det⁡G by [F13]. The one-member family consisting of the chart x and the constant function 1 is admissible chart-partition gluing data [F15], so the density-integration theorem [F15] applied to the manifold U with this chart partition gives, for every nonnegative Borel F:U→[0,∞], ∫UF dvol⁡g=∫ΩF(x−1(ξ))det⁡G(ξ) dλn(ξ).

2.1F7F10F11F12F18F25F26step 1.3step 1.4algebracases

The determinant identity. Fix ω∈Sn−1 and 0<t<cφ(ω), and put v:=φ−1(ω) and w:=tv. Then w∈Dp with x−1(tω)=exp⁡p(w)=γv(t) by 1.3, and en:=v together with an orthonormal basis (e1,…,en−1) of v⊥ is an orthonormal basis (e1,…,en) of TpM [F18]. The Gram matrix of the vectors d(exp⁡p)w(e1),…,d(exp⁡p)w(en) differs from G(tω) by conjugation with the orthogonal change-of-basis matrix, so it has the same determinant by [F26]. Its entries are computed as follows. For i,j≤n−1, linearity of the differential [F25] and the Jacobi identification [F11] give d(exp⁡p)w(tei)=d(exp⁡p)tv(t ei)=Ji(t), where the last equality uses [F11] for the base vector tv∈TpM (which lies in the exponential domain by [F7]) and the initial vector tei, together with the uniqueness in [F10] which identifies the resulting field with s↦Ji(st); hence g(d(exp⁡p)w(ei),d(exp⁡p)w(ej))=t−2g(Ji(t),Jj(t))=t−2A(t)ij with A(t)=a(t)a(t)T as in 1.4. For i≤n−1 the Gauss lemma [F12] with base vector tv and second vector tei gives g(d(exp⁡p)tv(tv),d(exp⁡p)tv(tei))=gp(tv,tei)=t2gp(v,ei)=0, and d(exp⁡p)tv(tv)=t d(exp⁡p)tv(v) by linearity [F25], so g(d(exp⁡p)w(v),d(exp⁡p)w(ei))=0; taking the pair (tv,tv) gives g(d(exp⁡p)w(v),d(exp⁡p)w(v))=1 in the same way. Therefore the Gram matrix in the adapted basis is block diagonal with blocks 1 and t−2A(t), so det⁡G(tω)=t−2(n−1)det⁡A(t)=t−2(n−1)(det⁡a(t))2 by [F26]; since det⁡a(t)>0 on (0,cp(v)) by 1.4, taking square roots gives det⁡G(tω) tn−1=det⁡a(t). For n=1 the basis (e1,…,en−1) is empty, G(tω) is the 1×1 matrix with entry 1, and both sides are 1 by the empty-determinant convention [F26].

3.1F6F13F16F17F18F21F22F25step 1.3step 1.5step 1.8step 2.1algebra

Reduction to a Euclidean polar integral. Let f:M→[0,∞] be Borel and let F:=f∣U. Since M∖U={p}∪Cut⁡(p) is null by 1.5, additivity [F22] and the null-set theorem [F21] give ∫Mf dvol⁡g=∫Uf dvol⁡g. Inserting the chart formula of 1.8, the integral becomes ∫Ωf(x−1(ξ))det⁡G(ξ) dλn(ξ)=∫Rnh dλn for the function h which equals f(x−1(ξ))det⁡G(ξ) on the open set Ω and 0 elsewhere; this h is nonnegative and Borel, because f is Borel, x−1 is smooth hence continuous [F16, F25], det⁡G is continuous on Ω by [F13], and Ω is open [F6, F18]. Since by 1.3 the ray through ω∈Sn−1 meets Ω exactly in {tω:0<t<cφ(ω)}, the polar formula [F17] gives ∫Rnh dλn=∫0∞∫Sn−11{t<cφ(ω)}f(γφ−1(ω)(t))det⁡G(tω) tn−1 dσ(ω) dt, and by the determinant identity of 2.1 the two integrands 1{t<cφ(ω)}f(γφ−1(ω)(t))det⁡G(tω)tn−1 and 1{t<cφ(ω)}f(γφ−1(ω)(t))det⁡aφ−1(ω)(t) agree at every point of Sn−1×(0,∞): on 0<t<cφ(ω) by 2.1, and off that set because both carry the indicator and det⁡av is defined for all t≥0 by 1.4. Hence ∫Mf dvol⁡g=∫0∞∫Sn−11{t<cφ(ω)}f(γφ−1(ω)(t))det⁡aφ−1(ω)(t) dσ(ω) dt.

4.1F17F31F32step 1.2step 1.3step 2.1step 3.1algebra

Tonelli's theorem, transport back to SpM, and the polar identity. Put K(ω,t):=1{t<cφ(ω)}f(γφ−1(ω)(t))det⁡aφ−1(ω)(t),(ω,t)∈Sn−1×(0,∞). This is product-measurable: by 2.1 and 1.3 it equals k(tω), where k(ξ):=1Ω(ξ) f(x−1(ξ))det⁡G(ξ) ∣ξ∣n−1 is a Borel function on Rn (indicator of the open set Ω, the Borel function f∘x−1, the continuous function det⁡G on Ω, and the continuous function ∣ξ∣n−1, with value 0 off Ω), and the map (ω,t)↦tω is continuous, hence Borel for the product Borel structure, which is the trace of B(Rn+1) by [F32]. The measure σ is finite by [F17] and Lebesgue measure on (0,∞) is sigma-finite, so Tonelli's theorem [F31] applies and gives ∫0∞∫Sn−1K dσ dt=∫Sn−1∫0∞K dt dσ=∫Sn−1∫0cφ(ω)f(γφ−1(ω)(t))det⁡aφ−1(ω)(t) dt dσ(ω), the last equality because K vanishes for t≥cφ(ω); moreover the function G(ω):=∫0cφ(ω)f(γφ−1(ω)(t))det⁡aφ−1(ω)(t) dt is Borel on Sn−1 by the measurability clause of [F31]. Since G is nonnegative and Borel, the integral transformation of 1.2 applied to G∘φ gives ∫Sn−1G dσ=∫SpMG(φ(v)) dσp(v). For v∈SpM one has φ(v)∈Sn−1, cφ(φ(v))=cp(v) and γφ−1(φ(v))=γv by 1.3, so G(φ(v))=∫0cp(v)f(γv(t))det⁡av(t) dt. Combining this with 3.1 proves ∫Mf dvol⁡g=∫SpM∫0cp(v)f(γv(t))det⁡av(t) dt dσp(v).

5.1F1F2F4F6F7F9F10F11F12F13F14F15F17F24F26F29F31step 1.1step 1.2step 1.3step 1.4step 1.5step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1givencases

Audit of degenerate, boundary, and choice cases. Dimension zero is discharged in 1.1; the empty manifold carries no point p and is excluded by the hypothesis p∈M. For n=1 the hyperplane v⊥ is the zero subspace, the basis (e1,…,en−1) and the matrix av(t) are empty, and det⁡av(t)=1 for every t by the empty-determinant convention, so the identity of (b) reduces to the sum of the two radial integrals over the two points of SpM; the transported measure σp is then counting measure with σp(SpM)=σ(S0)=2, consistently with [F17]. The zero vector is never used: SpM consists of unit vectors by [F2], t=0 is excluded from the integration domain (0,cp(v)) and is a single point of the parameter interval, and Ω⊆Rn∖{0} by 1.3. The endpoint t=cp(v) is excluded; the inner integral is the extended nonnegative integral over the open interval, so any blow-up of det⁡av(t) at the excluded endpoint is irrelevant, and when cp(v)=+∞ the inner integral is over (0,∞). Values f(q)=+∞ are allowed: f is [0,∞]-valued and the right-hand side of (b) is an extended nonnegative integral. Degenerate data are covered: f≡0 gives the identity 0=0; the zero Jacobi field is excluded from the vanishing combination of 1.4 because its initial derivative would vanish; and in 1.4 the conjugacy argument uses the Gram determinant criterion in the direction "vanishing determinant implies dependence" only. The argument contains no biconditional: (a) and (b) are identities, and the only equivalence invoked, the conjugacy characterization of [F29], is used in the direction conjugacy ⇒cp(v)≤t. Assumption [F1] is inherited exactly through the declared suppliers that carry it (the completeness and exponential statements [F6, F7], the cut-locus nullity [F4], the density gluing and integration theorems [F13, F14, F15], the polar formula [F17], the countable-null-set statement [F24], and Tonelli [F31]); the only selections made in the proof are the single existential instantiation of an orthonormal basis in 1.2 and the choice of a chart at p in 1.5, and the independence of σp from the first of these is proved, not assumed.

□

Source locator

Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry, Section 27.2, printed pp.200-202 (PDF labels P208-P210), display (27.1) and Lemma 27.2.1 with its proof, writes the volume element as A(r,θ⃗) dr dσn−1 with A=tn−1det⁡(dexp⁡p)tθ⃗ and computes det⁡G=t−2(n−1)det⁡⟨Ji,Jj⟩, so that A=∣γ˙∧J2∧⋯∧Jn∣; Sections 22.3 and 23.2-23.3, printed pp.163-172, supply the conjugate-point, cut-locus and exponential diffeomorphism statements. Lee, Riemannian Manifolds: An Introduction to Curvature, Chapter 10, printed pp.173-190, contains the corresponding Jacobi-field, conjugacy, exponential-differential and cut-locus material; Folland, Real Analysis, Theorem 2.49 and Proposition 2.23, gives the polar decomposition of Lebesgue measure and countable additivity of indefinite integrals. No source text is quoted; the argument above is routed through the published suppliers of this library.

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

336 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources