Alphabeta Math
DefinitionDefinition: Literature-sourcedProof: Not applicablePipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cut point and cut locus of a point

Definition

Assume countable choice as carried through the declared dependencies. Let (M,g) be a complete, connected, boundaryless Riemannian manifold and p∈M. Write SpM={v∈TpM:∣v∣g=1}. For each v∈SpM, let cp(v) be the cut time from Cut time in a unit tangent direction and put γv(t)=exp⁡p(tv). When cp(v)<∞, the point q=γv(cp(v))=exp⁡p(cp(v)v) is the cut point of p along γv. The cut locus of p is Cut⁡(p)={exp⁡p(cp(v)v):v∈SpM, cp(v)<∞}.

This is the finite-supremum definition used by Lee, Chapter 10, in the section “Geodesics Do Not Minimize Past Conjugate Points” (PDF label P206, printed p.190). The endpoint is indeed the last minimizing point on its specified ray: Minimizing along a geodesic is an initial interval property gives minimization at a finite cut time and initial-interval behavior. If cp(v) is finite, every 0≤t<cp(v) is also minimizing: the supremum property gives a minimizing time larger than t, and initial-interval behavior then applies. No t>cp(v) is minimizing, since cp(v) is an upper bound for the minimizing times. If cp(v)=+∞, every finite radial segment minimizes and this direction contributes no point to Cut⁡(p).

If M is empty there is no base point p, so there is no set Cut⁡(p) to evaluate. In dimension zero, SpM=∅ and hence Cut⁡(p)=∅. In dimension one, the two unit tangent directions at each point are handled separately by the same formula. The definition retains the declared ACω assumption; forming this set makes no simultaneous choice of directions and adds no further choice principle.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

11 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources