Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (gpt-6-sol)audited 2026-09-30
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Cut locus of a point on a flat circle

Example

Assume ACω. For L>0, let CL=R/(LZ) have the flat metric whose period-coordinate charts carry dx2, so its circumference is L. For every p=[x]∈CL, the two unit tangent directions are v+=∂x and v−=−∂x. Both have cut time cp(v+)=cp(v−)=L2, and Cut⁡(p)={[x+L/2]}, the antipode of p. At the cut point the two opposite semicircles are distinct minimizing geodesics.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A positive circumference L, the quotient circle CL, its flat metric, and a base point p=[x].

[A1]

ACω means every countable family of nonempty sets has a choice function (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). It is assumed only through the geodesic maximality, Hopf--Rinow, and cut-time/cut-locus interfaces below.

[F1]

The library uses the quotient circle R/Z as the flat circle factor with local metric dθ2 (Hopf–Rinow on a flat cylinder). Rescaling by x=Lθ gives CL=R/(LZ); its period-coordinate transitions are x↦x+kL, so dx2 is a well-defined smooth positive metric. These charts make CL a one-dimensional manifold without boundary. The class [0] makes it nonempty, and projected straight segments connect any two classes.

[F2]

In the quotient model, [r]=[s] exactly when their difference is an integer period (The circle as S1=R/Z with basepoint [0] after rescaling).

[F3]

The metric coefficient in a period chart is 1, so ∣u∂x∣=∣u∣ (Riemannian metric and riemannian manifold, Pointwise norm and angle from a riemannian metric). Riemannian speed is the norm of velocity and length is its integral over the smooth pieces (Riemannian speed and length); distance on this connected manifold is the infimum of lengths (Riemannian distance on a connected manifold).

[F4]

Every interval shorter than one period embeds as an open quotient arc (The quotient map is open, and every interval shorter than one embeds in R/Z). Thus the quotient projection is a covering: these arcs are homeomorphic to their interval lifts and have disjoint period translates as full preimage (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings). Every path has a unique lift from a specified starting point (Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map). The local inverse charts make a lift of a piecewise C1 path piecewise C1 and preserve its coordinate speed.

[F6]

For every real z there is an integer n with n≤z<n+1 (Integer part: for every real x there is exactly one integer m with m≤x<m+1).

[F7]

In coordinates, constant metric coefficients give zero Christoffel symbols, and a geodesic satisfies x¨k+Γkijx˙ix˙j=0 (Christoffel formula for the levi civita connection, Coordinate geodesic equation). Under ACω, initial data determine a unique maximal geodesic (Existence uniqueness and smooth dependence of geodesics); geodesic completeness means that every such maximal domain is R (Geodesically complete Riemannian manifold).

[F8]

Under ACω, Hopf--Rinow says a nonempty connected boundaryless Riemannian manifold is metrically complete exactly when it is geodesically complete (Hopf–Rinow theorem).

[F9]

Cut time is the supremum of the positive times t for which the radial distance equals t, and the cut locus consists of the finite cut-time endpoints over all unit directions; both definitions assume completeness, connectedness, no boundary, and ACω (Cut time in a unit tangent direction, Cut point and cut locus of a point).

Proof

technique · quotient lift and nearest-period calculation
1.1F1F2F3given

Write qL(x)=[x]. In every period chart the metric coefficient is 1, and chart changes are translations by kL, so the metric is well-defined. The explicit curve t↦[x+t(y−x)] connects any two classes, and [0] shows the circle is nonempty. These facts and [F1]-[F2] establish the quotient metric model; [F3] gives its tangent norms. Thus CL is nonempty, connected, one-dimensional, and boundaryless.

1.2F2F3F4F5

Fix p=[x] and q=[y]. Let α:[0,1]→CL be any piecewise C1 path from p to q, and lift it from x using [F4]. Its endpoint is y+kL for some k∈Z, by the quotient equivalence in [F2]. Choose a finite subdivision 0=a0<⋯<am=1 on which α is C1 on each piece; the local inverse charts for the covering make α~ C1 on those same pieces. Put Δi=α~(ai+1)−α~(ai). On each piece the lift has the same speed as α, and [F5] gives Δi=∫aiai+1α~′(t) dt and ∣Δi∣≤∫aiai+1∣α~′(t)∣ dt. Hence the triangle inequality and the length definition give ∣y+kL−x∣=∣α~(1)−α~(0)∣=∣∑i=0m−1Δi∣≤∑i=0m−1∣Δi∣≤∑i=0m−1∫aiai+1∣α~′(t)∣ dt=Lg(α). Thus Lg(α)≥∣y+kL−x∣≥inf⁡j∈Z∣y+jL−x∣. Taking the infimum over α gives dg(p,q)≥inf⁡j∣y+jL−x∣.

2.1A1F7step 1.1

For any point [x] and any tangent vector u∂x, define γ(t)=[x+ut] for all t∈R. In each period chart its coordinate is affine, the metric coefficients are constant, and [F7] gives Γ=0 and the geodesic equation. Thus this is a global geodesic with the prescribed initial data. Uniqueness of the maximal geodesic in [F7] implies that every maximal geodesic is defined on all of R. Hence CL is geodesically complete.

2.2F2F3F6step 1.2

Put z=(y−x)/L and choose n=⌊z+1/2⌋ by [F6]. Then −1/2≤z−n<1/2. For every integer j, this makes n a nearest integer to z: if j≥n+1 then j−z>1/2, and if j≤n−1 then z−j≥1/2. Therefore the infimum in step 1.2 is attained and inf⁡j∈Z∣y+jL−x∣=∣y−nL−x∣≤L/2. For each integer j, the projected straight segment σj(t)=[x+t(y+jL−x)], 0≤t≤1, joins p to q and has constant speed ∣y+jL−x∣. Choosing j=−n attains the lower bound in step 1.2, so dg([x],[y])=min⁡j∈Z∣y+jL−x∣. This also proves dg([x],[y])≤L/2 for all p,q.

3.1A1F8F9step 1.1step 2.1

The nonempty, connected, boundaryless hypotheses were checked in step 1.1, and step 2.1 gives geodesic completeness. Hopf--Rinow [F8] therefore makes (CL,dg) complete, as required by [F9].

3.2A1F3F9step 2.1step 2.2

By [F3], the unit tangent vectors at p are exactly v+=∂x and v−=−∂x. Their radial geodesics are γ±(t)=[x±t] by step 2.1. For 0<t<L/2, step 2.2 gives dg(p,γ±(t))=t. At t=L/2, both adjacent period representatives have absolute displacement L/2, so the same equality holds and there are two distinct minimizing semicircle segments: s↦[x+sL/2] and s↦[x−sL/2], 0≤s≤1. They have the same length L/2 and different interior points. If t>L/2, step 2.2 gives dg(p,γ±(t))≤L/2<t. Thus the positive minimizing-time set in each direction is exactly (0,L/2], and [F9] gives cp(v+)=cp(v−)=L/2.

4.1A1F2F3F6F7F9step 1.1step 3.1step 3.2∎

The two finite cut endpoints coincide: γ+(L/2)=[x+L/2]=[x−L/2]=γ−(L/2). The quotient relation makes this point independent of the representative x; it is the antipode. Since [F3] gives exactly the two unit directions and [F9] defines the cut locus as their finite cut endpoints, Cut⁡(p)={[x+L/2]}. The computation holds for every p. The circle is nonempty and one-dimensional, so the empty- and zero-dimensional cases are not instances; in dimension one both unit directions were handled. The degenerate value t=0 is excluded from the cut-time supremum, the included endpoint L/2 still minimizes, and every later time fails strictly. The only choice assumption is the declared ACω used through [F7]-[F9]; the quotient lifts are unique from the specified start and the nearest period is fixed by [F6], with no appeal to full AC. There is no iff claim.

Source locator

Lee, Riemannian Manifolds, Chapter 10, printed p.190 / PDF P206, lines 7559–7571, defines cut points and cut loci and notes that on the flat cylinder geodesics wrapping more than halfway are not minimizing. That passage does not give the circle quotient-distance calculation; steps 1.1–4.1 prove it here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

128 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources