Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For aba \le b and f:[a,b]Rmf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^m integrable when a<ba<b, abf2abf2\bigl\lVert\int_a^b f\bigr\rVert_2 \le \int_a^b \lVert f\rVert_2; for a<ba<b, f2\lVert f\rVert_2 is integrable

Statement

Let mNm \in \mathbb{N} with m1m \ge 1, let a,bRa, b \in \mathbb{R} with aba \le b and let f:[a,b]Rmf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^{m}. If a<ba<b, assume that ff is integrable (The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral). Then:

  1. if a<ba < b, the real-valued function tf(t)2t \mapsto \lVert f(t)\rVert_2 is integrable on [a,b][a,b] (The lower and upper Darboux integrals of a bounded ff on [a,b][a,b] as supPL(f,P)\sup_P L(f,P) and infPU(f,P)\inf_P U(f,P), Darboux integrability as their equality, and the notation abf\int_a^b f, The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty);
  2. abf2    abf2.\Bigl\lVert \int_a^b f \Bigr\rVert_2 \;\le\; \int_a^b \lVert f\rVert_2 .

The hypothesis aba \le b is not decoration. With the orientation convention of The integral with oriented limits: aaf:=0\int_a^a f := 0 and baf:=abf\int_b^a f := -\int_a^b f and The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral, interchanging the limits changes the sign of the right-hand side but not of the left, so for b<ab < a the correct statement is abf2abf2\bigl\lVert\int_a^b f\bigr\rVert_2 \le \bigl|\int_a^b \lVert f\rVert_2\bigr|; the displayed inequality as written is false in that case. This is the same trap the scalar inequality of If f,gf,g are integrable on [a,b][a,b] then so are f\lvert f\rvert, f2f^{2}, fgfg, max(f,g)\max(f,g) and min(f,g)\min(f,g), and abfabf\bigl\lvert\int_a^b f\bigr\rvert \le \int_a^b\lvert f\rvert carries.

Clause 1 is a genuine obligation and is discharged before the estimate. That each fif_i is integrable does not by itself say that i<mfi2\sqrt{\sum_{i<m} f_i^{2}} is; the square root has to be brought in through If ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] with values in [m,M][m,M] and φ\varphi is continuous on [m,M][m,M], then φf\varphi \circ f is integrable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural m1m \ge 1, reals aba \le b, a function f:[a,b]Rmf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^{m} that is integrable when a<ba<b, with components f0,,fm1f_0,\dots,f_{m-1}, and the vector v:=abfRmv := \int_a^b f \in \mathbb{R}^{m}; write g(t):=i<mfi(t)2g(t) := \sum_{i<m} f_i(t)^{2}, so that f(t)2=g(t)\lVert f(t)\rVert_2 = \sqrt{g(t)} (The Euclidean inner product x,y=k<nxkyk\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty).

[L2]

Linearity of the integral: integrable functions on [a,b][a,b] are closed under sums and scalar multiples, and ab(λu+μw)=λabu+μabw\int_a^b(\lambda u + \mu w) = \lambda\int_a^b u + \mu\int_a^b w (Integrable functions on [a,b][a,b] form a set closed under sums and scalar multiples, and ab(λf+μg)=λabf+μabg\int_a^b(\lambda f+\mu g) = \lambda\int_a^b f + \mu\int_a^b g).

[L3]

Monotonicity of the integral: for a<ba<b and integrable uwu \le w on [a,b][a,b], abuabw\int_a^b u \le \int_a^b w; and an integrable u0u \ge 0 has abu0\int_a^b u \ge 0 (If fgf \le g on [a,b][a,b] and both are integrable then abfabg\int_a^b f \le \int_a^b g; and m(ba)abfM(ba)m(b-a) \le \int_a^b f \le M(b-a)).

[L6]

Square roots (Square roots exist: a unique a0\sqrt{a} \ge 0 with (a)2=a(\sqrt{a})^2 = a; the positives are {x2:x0}\{x^2 : x \neq 0\}, Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives): every c0c \ge 0 has a unique c0\sqrt{c} \ge 0 with (c)2=c(\sqrt c)^{2} = c, and ss2s \mapsto s^{2} is strictly increasing on the nonnegatives, hence injective there.

[L8]

Cauchy-Schwarz and the inner product: u,w=i<muiwi\langle u,w\rangle = \sum_{i<m}u_iw_i is bilinear and symmetric, u2=u,u\lVert u\rVert_2 = \sqrt{\langle u,u\rangle}, u20\lVert u\rVert_2 \ge 0, and u,wu2w2|\langle u,w\rangle| \le \lVert u\rVert_2\lVert w\rVert_2 (The Euclidean inner product x,y=k<nxkyk\langle x,y\rangle = \sum_{k<n} x_k y_k on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, Cauchy-Schwarz x,yx2y2\lvert\langle x,y\rangle\rvert \le \lVert x\rVert_2\lVert y\rVert_2 with its equality case, the triangle inequality for 2\lVert\cdot\rVert_2, the parallelogram law and polarisation, A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms).

[L10]

Order arithmetic: u>0u > 0 gives u1>0u^{-1} > 0, a product of nonnegatives is nonnegative, and ttt \le |t| (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order, Basic properties of the absolute value).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

If a=ba = b then abf=0\int_a^b f = 0 and abf2=0\int_a^b\lVert f\rVert_2 = 0 by the oriented convention, so clause 2 reads 000 \le 0 and holds, while clause 1 says nothing in that case; assume a<ba < b from here on.

L1
1.2

Each component fif_i is bounded and integrable on [a,b][a,b], so each fi2f_i^{2} is integrable.

L1L4
1.3

Pointwise, v,f(t)v,f(t)v2f(t)2\langle v, f(t)\rangle \le \bigl|\langle v,f(t)\rangle\bigr| \le \lVert v\rVert_2\,\lVert f(t)\rVert_2 by Cauchy-Schwarz.

L8L10
2.1

By induction on pmp \le m, every finite sum i<pfi2\sum_{i<p} f_i^{2} is integrable, the empty sum being the constant 00 and each successor step adding one integrable function. Hence g=i<mfi2g = \sum_{i<m}f_i^{2} is integrable.

step 1.2L2L9
2.2

The real-valued function tv,f(t)=i<mvifi(t)t \mapsto \langle v, f(t)\rangle = \sum_{i<m}v_i f_i(t) is integrable, being a finite sum of scalar multiples of the integrable fif_i, and by linearity applied mm times abv,f=i<mviabfi=i<mvivi=v,v=v22\int_a^b \langle v,f\rangle = \sum_{i<m} v_i\int_a^b f_i = \sum_{i<m}v_i\,v_i = \langle v,v\rangle = \lVert v\rVert_2^{2}.

step 1.2L1L2L8L9
3.1

g(t)0g(t) \ge 0 for every tt, being a finite sum of squares, and gg is bounded above: each fi|f_i| is bounded by some BiB_i, so g(t)i<mBi2=:Kg(t) \le \sum_{i<m}B_i^{2} =: K. Thus gg takes its values in [0,K][0,K].

step 2.1L1L9L10
4.1

The map ss2s \mapsto s^{2} is continuous and injective on the order-convex set [0,K][0,\sqrt K], with image [0,K][0,K]; by the continuous inverse theorem its inverse φ:[0,K][0,K]\varphi : [0,K] \to [0,\sqrt K], φ(u)=u\varphi(u) = \sqrt u, is continuous on [0,K][0,K].

step 3.1L6L7
5.1

f(t)2=g(t)=φ(g(t))\lVert f(t)\rVert_2 = \sqrt{g(t)} = \varphi(g(t)) for every t[a,b]t \in [a,b], so f2=φg\lVert f\rVert_2 = \varphi \circ g is integrable on [a,b][a,b]; this is clause 1.

step 2.1step 3.1step 4.1L5L8
6.1

Both sides of step 1.3 are integrable on [a,b][a,b], so monotonicity and linearity give v22=abv,fabv2f2=v2abf2\lVert v\rVert_2^{2} = \int_a^b\langle v,f\rangle \le \int_a^b \lVert v\rVert_2\lVert f\rVert_2 = \lVert v\rVert_2\int_a^b\lVert f\rVert_2.

step 5.1step 2.2step 1.3L2L3
6.2

If v=0v = 0 then v2=0\lVert v\rVert_2 = 0, while abf20\int_a^b\lVert f\rVert_2 \ge 0 because f20\lVert f\rVert_2 \ge 0 pointwise and a<ba<b; so clause 2 holds in this case.

step 5.1L3L8
7.1

If v0v \ne 0 then v2>0\lVert v\rVert_2 > 0, so multiplying the inequality of step 6.1 by the positive 1/v21/\lVert v\rVert_2 gives v2abf2\lVert v\rVert_2 \le \int_a^b\lVert f\rVert_2, which is clause 2 in this case.

step 6.1L8L10
8.1

The two cases of steps 6.2 and 7.1 exhaust the possibilities for vv, so clause 2 holds; with step 5.1 both clauses are proved.

step 5.1step 6.2step 7.1

Remarks

  • The case split at v=0v = 0 is mandatory. Step 6.1 delivers only v22v2abf2\lVert v\rVert_2^{2} \le \lVert v\rVert_2 \int_a^b\lVert f\rVert_2, and dividing by v2\lVert v\rVert_2 is illegitimate when that number is 00. Many textbook presentations divide without comment; the missing case is genuinely separate, and it is the one where the right-hand side has to be shown nonnegative on its own.

  • Why the inner-product route rather than a componentwise estimate. Bounding each coordinate of abf\int_a^b f separately and reassembling gives a constant depending on mm; the argument above gives the sharp inequality with no constant, and it uses only bilinearity, Cauchy-Schwarz and monotonicity of the integral. The companion page checks the inequality numerically on an explicit curve and shows it is strict there.

  • Clause 1 is where the hypotheses of If ff is integrable on [a,b][a,b] with values in [m,M][m,M] and φ\varphi is continuous on [m,M][m,M], then φf\varphi \circ f is integrable are checked, one by one: gg is integrable, its values lie in a closed bounded interval, and the outer function is continuous on that interval. The order of that theorem's hypotheses matters — continuous after integrable — and it is respected here.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 217 results over 34 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources