Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-21
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Grönwall estimate for two solutions of a Lipschitz ODE

Statement

Let F:D→Rn be continuous on an open ODE domain, let I⊆R be an order-convex interval with at least two elements, and let x,y:I→Rn solve z′=F(t,z) with both graphs in D. Fix t0∈I, and suppose that for every t∈I,

∥F(t,x(t))−F(t,y(t))∥2≤L∥x(t)−y(t)∥2.

Then

∥x(t)−y(t)∥2≤eL∣t−t0∣∥x(t0)−y(t0)∥2.

Coincident initial values give uniqueness on every common interval.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The two solutions and common state-Lipschitz constant in the Statement.

[L1]

For a continuous field on an open ODE domain and an order-convex interval with at least two elements, a curve solves the IVP if and only if it satisfies the associated Volterra integral equation (A first-order initial value problem is equivalent to its Volterra integral equation).

[L2]

If a continuous nonnegative function u satisfies u(t)≤A+∫t0tLu(s) ds with constants A,L≥0, then u(t)≤AeL(t−t0); the reflected statement holds to the left of t0 (Gronwall's integral inequality with variable and constant coefficients).

[L3]

For increasing limits the norm of a vector integral is at most the integral of the Euclidean norm, and for reversed limits the oriented form has the absolute value of that scalar integral (For a≤b and f:[a,b]→Rm integrable when a<b, ∥∫abf∥2≤∫ab∥f∥2; for a<b, ∥f∥2 is integrable).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenL1L3L4

Subtracting the two equations from [L1], applying [L3], and integrating the stated pairwise Lipschitz inequality with [L4] on the compact interval between t0 and t gives ∥x(t)−y(t)∥2≤∥x(t0)−y(t0)∥2+L∣∫t0t∥x(s)−y(s)∥2ds∣.

2.1step 1.1L2algebra∎

Applying [L2] in the relevant time orientation gives the displayed estimate; at t=t0 it is equality, for L=0 it is constant, and a zero initial difference forces equality of the solutions.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

43 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources