Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-generatedProof: Not applicableSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)judge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)verified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conventions of this page, the standing n1n \ge 1 hypothesis, and what is taken up elsewhere in the reading order

1. The standing hypothesis $n \ge 1$, and exactly where it comes from

The published Rn\mathbb{R}^n as the set of functions nRn \to \mathbb{R}, and d1d_1, d2d_2, dd_\infty are metrics on it defines Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} together with the metrics d1d_1, d2d_2, dd_\infty only for n1n \ge 1, and says why: at n=0n = 0 the value d(x,y)d_\infty(x,y) would be a maximum over the empty index set, which does not exist. Everything downstream of that item inherits the hypothesis, and this page inherits it too. In particular R\mathbb{R} and Rn\mathbb{R}^n for n1n \ge 1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R\mathbb{R} and Heine-Borel in Rn\mathbb{R}^n: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn\mathbb{R}^n is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line are stated for n1n \ge 1 and are never cited here for all nn.

The boundary runs between the algebra and the metric, not where a reader would guess. The following items of this page carry no hypothesis on the dimension:

The remaining items all carry n1n \ge 1 (or m1m \ge 1 for the codomain of a vector-valued function), and each states it in its own Statement: The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty for \lVert\cdot\rVert_\infty; clauses 2 and 3 of Each p\lVert\cdot\rVert_p is a norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and the induced metrics are exactly d1d_1, d2d_2 and dd_\infty of the published metric-spaces page; clauses 2, 3, 4 of The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n1n \ge 1 every norm NN on Rn\mathbb{R}^n satisfies N(x)Cx1N(x) \le C\lVert x\rVert_1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2d_2; For n1n \ge 1 all norms on Rn\mathbb{R}^n are equivalent; For n1n \ge 1 a sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^n converges iff each coordinate sequence converges, is Cauchy iff each coordinate sequence is Cauchy, and Rn\mathbb{R}^n is complete in every norm; For n1n \ge 1 every bounded sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^n has a convergent subsequence; Vector-valued functions f:ARmf : A \to \mathbb{R}^m, their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions; A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions; The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral; For aba \le b and f:[a,b]Rmf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^m integrable when a<ba<b, abf2abf2\bigl\lVert\int_a^b f\bigr\rVert_2 \le \int_a^b \lVert f\rVert_2; for a<ba<b, f2\lVert f\rVert_2 is integrable; The mean value inequality: if f:[a,b]Rmf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^m is continuous and differentiable on (a,b)(a,b) with f2M\lVert f'\rVert_2 \le M, then f(b)f(a)2M(ba)\lVert f(b)-f(a)\rVert_2 \le M(b-a); If f:[a,b]Rmf : [a,b] \to \mathbb{R}^m is differentiable with integrable ff' then abf=f(b)f(a)\int_a^b f' = f(b)-f(a); and a bounded derivative makes ff Lipschitz; Series of vectors in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, absolute convergence, rearrangement, and the set of rearrangement sums; An absolutely convergent series in Rn\mathbb{R}^n converges, and every rearrangement converges to the same sum; The subspace Γ\Gamma of directions along which a series converges absolutely, and its orthogonal complement Γ\Gamma^{\perp}; Steinitz's polygonal confinement theorem: finitely many vectors of norm at most 11 summing to 00 can be ordered so that every partial sum has norm at most nn; and The set of rearrangement sums of a convergent series in Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a nonempty subset of the affine subspace s+Γs + \Gamma^{\perp}.

Where a statement about n=0n = 0 is nevertheless true, it is proved here from scratch rather than imported: see the second remark of For n1n \ge 1 a sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^n converges iff each coordinate sequence converges, is Cauchy iff each coordinate sequence is Cauchy, and Rn\mathbb{R}^n is complete in every norm for completeness of R0\mathbb{R}^{0}.

2. The exponent of a $p$-norm is rational

Rational powers ara^r of a positive base supplies ara^{r} for a positive base and any rational exponent, together with 0r0^{r} for rational r>0r>0; real exponents do not exist at this point in the reading order; Why real exponents are deferred on the rational-powers page records why. Consequently The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty defines p\lVert\cdot\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1 only, and the published Minkowski inequality it rests on is itself stated for rational pp. No statement on this page is written with pp ranging over a real interval, and the phrase "for p[1,)p \in [1,\infty)" appears nowhere.

3. $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ is a function space

Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is the set of functions nRn \to \mathbb{R} (The vector space FXF^{X} of all functions XFX \to F with pointwise operations, and FnF^{n} as the case X=n={0,1,,n1}X = n = \{0, 1, \dots, n-1\}, Rn\mathbb{R}^n as the set of functions nRn \to \mathbb{R}, and d1d_1, d2d_2, dd_\infty are metrics on it), so R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is not literally R\mathbb{R}: its elements are functions on the one-element set 11. Every comparison on this page between the theory in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and the published one-dimensional theory therefore goes through the isometric bijection θ:RR1\theta : \mathbb{R} \to \mathbb{R}^{1} sending tt to the function with value tt at 00, and each item that makes such a comparison states the identification explicitly: For n1n \ge 1 every bounded sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^n has a convergent subsequence, Vector-valued functions f:ARmf : A \to \mathbb{R}^m, their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions, Series of vectors in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, absolute convergence, rearrangement, and the set of rearrangement sums and The set of rearrangement sums of a convergent series in Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a nonempty subset of the affine subspace s+Γs + \Gamma^{\perp}. Coordinates are indexed from 00 throughout, as The standard list e:nFne : n \to F^{n} with ei(i)=1Fe_i(i) = 1_F and ei(j)=0Fe_i(j) = 0_F for jij \ne i is an ordered basis of FnF^{n}; hence dimFFn=n\dim_F F^{n} = n, and F0F^{0} is the zero space with basis \varnothing and dimension 00 fixes.

4. What is taken up elsewhere in the reading order

Each item below is a statement about where material sits in this library's reading order, and none of them is a claim about mathematics that this library denies.

5. The open half of the rearrangement question

The set of rearrangement sums of a convergent series in Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a nonempty subset of the affine subspace s+Γs + \Gamma^{\perp} proves that the set S(x)\mathcal{S}(x) of rearrangement sums of a convergent series in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} is nonempty and contained in the affine subspace s+Γs + \Gamma^{\perp}, and Steinitz's polygonal confinement theorem: finitely many vectors of norm at most 11 summing to 00 can be ordered so that every partial sum has norm at most nn proves Steinitz's polygonal confinement lemma in full. The reverse inclusion is not proved on this page, and this page asserts nothing about it in either direction, for any n2n \ge 2. No recorded-not-proved item has been created for it either.

The obstruction is machinery and not effort. Every route to the reverse inclusion known to the author of this page reduces first to the case Γ={0}\Gamma = \{0\} by an orthogonal projection, which needs the orthogonal decomposition named in §4, and then runs a separation argument for convex sets in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, which exists nowhere in this library and is owned by no planned page. When both exist, the discharge is an addition to this page, not a new page.

The published The same question in Rd\mathbb{R}^d: what the set of rearrangement sums looks like, and why that answer is not reachable at this point in the reading order raised this question on the series page and declined to state what the literature answers; this page answers the part it can and continues to decline the rest. What a reader is protected from meanwhile is the wrong guess: the companion page refutes outright the naive Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} analogue of the Riemann series theorem, using the containment half and nothing more.

6. A naming collision worth stating once

Steinitz's polygonal confinement theorem: finitely many vectors of norm at most 11 summing to 00 can be ordered so that every partial sum has norm at most nn is Steinitz's polygonal confinement lemma from his 1913 paper on conditionally convergent series. It is not the Steinitz exchange lemma of linear algebra, which is published in this library under the id thm-steinitz-exchange and additionally carries the alias lem-steinitz. The two are different theorems by the same author; the ids do not collide, and no item on this page uses the bare alias.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 293 results over 39 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources