Alphabeta Math
RemarkRemark: AI-generatedProof: Not applicablejudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)verified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Conventions of this page, the standing n≥1 hypothesis, and what is taken up elsewhere in the reading order

1. The standing hypothesis $n \ge 1$, and exactly where it comes from

The published Rn as the set of functions n→R, and d1, d2, d∞ are metrics on it defines Rn together with the metrics d1, d2, d∞ only for n≥1, and says why: at n=0 the value d∞(x,y) would be a maximum over the empty index set, which does not exist. Everything downstream of that item inherits the hypothesis, and this page inherits it too. In particular R and Rn for n≥1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R and Heine-Borel in Rn: with the Euclidean metric a subset of Rn is compact if and only if it is closed and bounded, and the proof by bisection uses no choice principle; the same holds on the real line are stated for n≥1 and are never cited here for all n.

The boundary runs between the algebra and the metric, not where a reader would guess. The following items of this page carry no hypothesis on the dimension:

The remaining items all carry n≥1 (or m≥1 for the codomain of a vector-valued function), and each states it in its own Statement: The p-norms ∥x∥p for rational p≥1, and ∥x∥∞ for ∥⋅∥∞; clauses 2 and 3 of Each ∥⋅∥p is a norm on Rn, and the induced metrics are exactly d1, d2 and d∞ of the published metric-spaces page; clauses 2, 3, 4 of The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n≥1 every norm N on Rn satisfies N(x)≤C∥x∥1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2; For n≥1 all norms on Rn are equivalent; For n≥1 a sequence in Rn converges iff each coordinate sequence converges, is Cauchy iff each coordinate sequence is Cauchy, and Rn is complete in every norm; For n≥1 every bounded sequence in Rn has a convergent subsequence; Vector-valued functions f:A→Rm, their limits and continuity, with the dictionary to the metric notions; A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions; The derivative and the Riemann integral of a vector-valued function: an intrinsic derivative and a componentwise integral; For a≤b and f:[a,b]→Rm integrable when a<b, ∥∫abf∥2≤∫ab∥f∥2; for a<b, ∥f∥2 is integrable; The mean value inequality: if f:[a,b]→Rm is continuous and differentiable on (a,b) with ∥f′∥2≤M, then ∥f(b)−f(a)∥2≤M(b−a); If f:[a,b]→Rm is differentiable with integrable f′ then ∫abf′=f(b)−f(a); and a bounded derivative makes f Lipschitz; Series of vectors in Rn, absolute convergence, rearrangement, and the set of rearrangement sums; An absolutely convergent series in Rn converges, and every rearrangement converges to the same sum; The subspace Γ of directions along which a series converges absolutely, and its orthogonal complement Γ⊥; Steinitz's polygonal confinement theorem: finitely many vectors of norm at most 1 summing to 0 can be ordered so that every partial sum has norm at most n; and The set of rearrangement sums of a convergent series in Rn is a nonempty subset of the affine subspace s+Γ⊥.

Where a statement about n=0 is nevertheless true, it is proved here from scratch rather than imported: see the second remark of For n≥1 a sequence in Rn converges iff each coordinate sequence converges, is Cauchy iff each coordinate sequence is Cauchy, and Rn is complete in every norm for completeness of R0.

2. The exponent of a $p$-norm is rational

Rational powers ar of a positive base supplies ar for a positive base and any rational exponent, together with 0r for rational r>0; real exponents do not exist at this point in the reading order; Why real exponents are deferred on the rational-powers page records why. Consequently The p-norms ∥x∥p for rational p≥1, and ∥x∥∞ defines ∥⋅∥p for rational p≥1 only, and the published Minkowski inequality it rests on is itself stated for rational p. No statement on this page is written with p ranging over a real interval, and the phrase "for p∈[1,∞)" appears nowhere.

3. $\mathbb{R}^{n}$ is a function space

4. What is taken up elsewhere in the reading order

Each item below is a statement about where material sits in this library's reading order, and none of them is a claim about mathematics that this library denies.

5. The open half of the rearrangement question

The set of rearrangement sums of a convergent series in Rn is a nonempty subset of the affine subspace s+Γ⊥ proves that the set S(x) of rearrangement sums of a convergent series in Rn is nonempty and contained in the affine subspace s+Γ⊥, and Steinitz's polygonal confinement theorem: finitely many vectors of norm at most 1 summing to 0 can be ordered so that every partial sum has norm at most n proves Steinitz's polygonal confinement lemma in full. The reverse inclusion is not proved on this page, and this page asserts nothing about it in either direction, for any n≥2. No recorded-not-proved item has been created for it either.

The obstruction is machinery and not effort. Every route to the reverse inclusion known to the author of this page reduces first to the case Γ={0} by an orthogonal projection, which needs the orthogonal decomposition named in §4, and then runs a separation argument for convex sets in Rn, which exists nowhere in this library and is owned by no planned page. When both exist, the discharge is an addition to this page, not a new page.

The published The same question in Rd: what the set of rearrangement sums looks like, and why that answer is not reachable at this point in the reading order raised this question on the series page and declined to state what the literature answers; this page answers the part it can and continues to decline the rest. What a reader is protected from meanwhile is the wrong guess: the companion page refutes outright the naive Rn analogue of the Riemann series theorem, using the containment half and nothing more.

6. A naming collision worth stating once

Steinitz's polygonal confinement theorem: finitely many vectors of norm at most 1 summing to 0 can be ordered so that every partial sum has norm at most n is Steinitz's polygonal confinement lemma from his 1913 paper on conditionally convergent series. It is not the Steinitz exchange lemma of linear algebra, which is published in this library under the id thm-steinitz-exchange and additionally carries the alias lem-steinitz. The two are different theorems by the same author; the ids do not collide, and no item on this page uses the bare alias.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

167 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources