Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An absolutely convergent series in Rn\mathbb{R}^n converges, and every rearrangement converges to the same sum

Statement

Let nNn \in \mathbb{N} with n1n \ge 1 and let (xk)(x_k) be a sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} whose series converges absolutely (Series of vectors in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, absolute convergence, rearrangement, and the set of rearrangement sums). Then:

  1. xk\sum x_k converges; write s:=k=0xks := \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}x_k.
  2. For every bijection σ:NN\sigma : \mathbb{N} \to \mathbb{N} (Injection, surjection, bijection) the rearranged series xσ(k)\sum x_{\sigma(k)} converges absolutely, with k=0xσ(k)=s\sum_{k=0}^{\infty}x_{\sigma(k)} = s.
  3. Consequently S(x)={s}\mathcal{S}(x) = \{s\}: the set of rearrangement sums is a single point.

This is the Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} analogue of the published one-dimensional statements, not a generalisation of their proofs. If ak\sum |a_k| converges then ak\sum a_k converges and Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: an absolutely convergent series converges unconditionally, and every rearrangement of it has the same sum are proved on the real line; everything below reduces to them coordinatewise, or to completeness of (Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n1n \ge 1; a sequence (xk)(x_k) in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with xk2\sum \lVert x_k\rVert_2 convergent; the vector partial sums sN=k<Nxks_N = \sum_{k<N}x_k and the real partial sums TN=k<Nxk2T_N = \sum_{k<N}\lVert x_k\rVert_2; a bijection σ\sigma of N\mathbb{N}; a rational ε>0\varepsilon > 0.

[L3]

Splitting of finite sums: for LNL \le N, k<Nak=k<Lak+k=LN1ak\sum_{k<N}a_k = \sum_{k<L}a_k + \sum_{k=L}^{N-1}a_k, and the same identity in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} read pointwise (Laws of finite sums and finite products clause 3, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion, The standard list e:nFne : n \to F^{n} with ei(i)=1Fe_i(i) = 1_F and ei(j)=0Fe_i(j) = 0_F for jij \ne i is an ordered basis of FnF^{n}; hence dimFFn=n\dim_F F^{n} = n, and F0F^{0} is the zero space with basis \varnothing and dimension 00 clause 1).

[L7]

Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: if ak\sum a_k converges absolutely then for every bijection σ\sigma of N\mathbb{N} the series aσ(k)\sum |a_{\sigma(k)}| converges with the same sum as ak\sum|a_k|, and aσ(k)\sum a_{\sigma(k)} converges with the same sum as ak\sum a_k (Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: an absolutely convergent series converges unconditionally, and every rearrangement of it has the same sum, Absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent series, and the general starting index).

[L8]

Absolute convergence implies convergence for real series, and a convergent series of nonnegative terms is absolutely convergent, its terms being their own absolute values (If ak\sum |a_k| converges then ak\sum a_k converges, Absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent series, and the general starting index).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For LNL \le N: sNsL=k=LN1xks_N - s_L = \sum_{k=L}^{N-1}x_k and TNTL=k=LN1xk2T_N - T_L = \sum_{k=L}^{N-1}\lVert x_k\rVert_2, both by splitting, the vector identity being the pointwise reading of the real one.

L1L3
1.2

The real sequence (TN)(T_N) converges by hypothesis, hence is Cauchy in (R,dR)(\mathbb{R},d_{\mathbb{R}}): for every rational ε>0\varepsilon>0 there is KK with TNTL<ε|T_N - T_L| < \varepsilon for all N,LKN,L \ge K.

L4L8
1.3

For every j<nj<n and every kk: 0(xk)jxk20 \le |(x_k)_j| \le \lVert x_k\rVert_2.

L2
1.4

Likewise kxσ(k)2k \mapsto \lVert x_{\sigma(k)}\rVert_2 is the rearrangement along σ\sigma of kxk2k \mapsto \lVert x_k\rVert_2, a convergent series of nonnegative terms and therefore absolutely convergent, so kxσ(k)2\sum_k\lVert x_{\sigma(k)}\rVert_2 converges; that is, xσ(k)\sum x_{\sigma(k)} converges absolutely.

L7L8L1
2.1

Hence sNsL2k=LN1xk2=TNTL\lVert s_N - s_L\rVert_2 \le \sum_{k=L}^{N-1}\lVert x_k\rVert_2 = T_N - T_L by the finite triangle inequality.

step 1.1L2
2.2

By step 1.3 and the comparison test, the real series k(xk)j\sum_k |(x_k)_j| converges for every j<nj<n; so each coordinate series k(xk)j\sum_k (x_k)_j converges absolutely.

step 1.3L6L8
3.1

By steps 2.1 and 1.2, for NLKN \ge L \ge K we get d2(sN,sL)=sNsL2TNTL<εd_2(s_N,s_L) = \lVert s_N-s_L\rVert_2 \le |T_N-T_L| < \varepsilon, and the same bound with NN and LL exchanged; so (sN)(s_N) is Cauchy in (Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_2).

step 2.1step 1.2L4
3.2

Fix a bijection σ\sigma. For every j<nj<n the sequence k(xσ(k))jk \mapsto (x_{\sigma(k)})_j is the rearrangement along σ\sigma of the sequence k(xk)jk \mapsto (x_k)_j; by step 2.2 the latter series converges absolutely, so Dirichlet's theorem gives that k(xσ(k))j\sum_k (x_{\sigma(k)})_j converges with the same sum as k(xk)j\sum_k (x_k)_j.

step 2.2L7
4.1

Since (Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_2) is complete, the Cauchy sequence (sN)(s_N) converges; that is, xk\sum x_k converges, which is clause 1. Write ss for its sum.

step 3.1L4
5.1

By clause 1 applied to the sequence kxσ(k)k \mapsto x_{\sigma(k)}, which converges absolutely by step 1.4, the series xσ(k)\sum x_{\sigma(k)} converges; and by step 3.2 each coordinate of its sum equals the corresponding coordinate of ss, so its sum is ss. This is clause 2.

step 4.1step 3.2step 1.4L5
6.1

By clause 2 every rearrangement of xk\sum x_k converges to ss, and the identity bijection shows sS(x)s \in \mathcal{S}(x); so S(x)={s}\mathcal{S}(x) = \{s\}, which is clause 3.

step 4.1step 5.1L1

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 206 results over 38 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources