Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An absolutely convergent series in Rn converges, and every rearrangement converges to the same sum

Statement

Let n∈N with n≥1 and let (xk) be a sequence in Rn whose series converges absolutely (Series of vectors in Rn, absolute convergence, rearrangement, and the set of rearrangement sums). Then:

  1. ∑xk converges; write s:=∑k=0∞xk.
  2. For every bijection σ:N→N (Injection, surjection, bijection) the rearranged series ∑xσ(k) converges absolutely, with ∑k=0∞xσ(k)=s.
  3. Consequently S(x)={s}: the set of rearrangement sums is a single point.

This is the Rn analogue of the published one-dimensional statements, not a generalisation of their proofs. If ∑∣ak∣ converges then ∑ak converges and Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: an absolutely convergent series converges unconditionally, and every rearrangement of it has the same sum are proved on the real line; everything below reduces to them coordinatewise, or to completeness of (Rn,d2).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n≥1; a sequence (xk) in Rn with ∑∥xk∥2 convergent; the vector partial sums sN=∑k<Nxk and the real partial sums TN=∑k<N∥xk∥2; a bijection σ of N; a rational ε>0.

[L7]

Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: if ∑ak converges absolutely then for every bijection σ of N the series ∑∣aσ(k)∣ converges with the same sum as ∑∣ak∣, and ∑aσ(k) converges with the same sum as ∑ak (Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: an absolutely convergent series converges unconditionally, and every rearrangement of it has the same sum, Absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent series, and the general starting index).

[L8]

Absolute convergence implies convergence for real series, and a convergent series of nonnegative terms is absolutely convergent, its terms being their own absolute values (If ∑∣ak∣ converges then ∑ak converges, Absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent series, and the general starting index).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For L≤N: sN−sL=∑k=LN−1xk and TN−TL=∑k=LN−1∥xk∥2, both by splitting, the vector identity being the pointwise reading of the real one.

L1L3
1.2

The real sequence (TN) converges by hypothesis, hence is Cauchy in (R,dR): for every rational ε>0 there is K with ∣TN−TL∣<ε for all N,L≥K.

L4L8
1.3

For every j<n and every k: 0≤∣(xk)j∣≤∥xk∥2.

L2
1.4

Likewise k↦∥xσ(k)∥2 is the rearrangement along σ of k↦∥xk∥2, a convergent series of nonnegative terms and therefore absolutely convergent, so ∑k∥xσ(k)∥2 converges; that is, ∑xσ(k) converges absolutely.

L7L8L1
2.1

Hence ∥sN−sL∥2≤∑k=LN−1∥xk∥2=TN−TL by the finite triangle inequality.

step 1.1L2
2.2

By step 1.3 and the comparison test, the real series ∑k∣(xk)j∣ converges for every j<n; so each coordinate series ∑k(xk)j converges absolutely.

step 1.3L6L8
3.1

By steps 2.1 and 1.2, for N≥L≥K we get d2(sN,sL)=∥sN−sL∥2≤∣TN−TL∣<ε, and the same bound with N and L exchanged; so (sN) is Cauchy in (Rn,d2).

step 2.1step 1.2L4
3.2

Fix a bijection σ. For every j<n the sequence k↦(xσ(k))j is the rearrangement along σ of the sequence k↦(xk)j; by step 2.2 the latter series converges absolutely, so Dirichlet's theorem gives that ∑k(xσ(k))j converges with the same sum as ∑k(xk)j.

step 2.2L7
4.1

Since (Rn,d2) is complete, the Cauchy sequence (sN) converges; that is, ∑xk converges, which is clause 1. Write s for its sum.

step 3.1L4
5.1

By clause 1 applied to the sequence k↦xσ(k), which converges absolutely by step 1.4, the series ∑xσ(k) converges; and by step 3.2 each coordinate of its sum equals the corresponding coordinate of s, so its sum is s. This is clause 2.

step 4.1step 3.2step 1.4L5
6.1

By clause 2 every rearrangement of ∑xk converges to s, and the identity bijection shows s∈S(x); so S(x)={s}, which is clause 3.

step 4.1step 5.1L1∎

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

108 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources