Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For n1n \ge 1 a sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^n converges iff each coordinate sequence converges, is Cauchy iff each coordinate sequence is Cauchy, and Rn\mathbb{R}^n is complete in every norm

Statement

Let nNn \in \mathbb{N} with n1n \ge 1, let Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} carry the Euclidean metric d2d_2 of Rn\mathbb{R}^n as the set of functions nRn \to \mathbb{R}, and d1d_1, d2d_2, dd_\infty are metrics on it, and let (x(j))jN\bigl(x^{(j)}\bigr)_{j\in\mathbb{N}} be a sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} (Convergence of a sequence in a metric space: xkxx_k \to x iff d(xk,x)0d(x_k, x) \to 0 in R\mathbb{R}). For k<nk < n write (xk(j))jN\bigl(x^{(j)}_k\bigr)_{j\in\mathbb{N}} for the kk-th coordinate sequence, a sequence of reals (Sequences of reals: bounded, eventually, frequently, tails, subsequences). Then:

  1. Convergence is componentwise. For xRnx \in \mathbb{R}^{n}, x(j)xx^{(j)} \to x in (Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n}, d_2) if and only if xk(j)xkx^{(j)}_k \to x_k in R\mathbb{R} for every k<nk<n (Limits and Cauchy sequences of reals).
  2. Cauchyness is componentwise. (x(j))\bigl(x^{(j)}\bigr) is Cauchy in (Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_2) (Cauchy sequence in a metric space) if and only if every coordinate sequence is Cauchy in R\mathbb{R}.
  3. Completeness in every norm. For every norm NN on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms) the metric space (Rn,dN)(\mathbb{R}^{n}, d_N) is complete (Complete metric space: every Cauchy sequence converges in the space).

Clause 3 is obtained by citation and is not reproved here. R\mathbb{R} and Rn\mathbb{R}^n for n1n \ge 1 with the Euclidean metric are complete, componentwise from the Cauchy criterion in R\mathbb{R} clause 2 states that (Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_2) is complete, for n1n \ge 1 only, and this theorem carries that hypothesis forward without weakening it; what is added is the passage from d2d_2 to an arbitrary norm, through For n1n \ge 1 all norms on Rn\mathbb{R}^n are equivalent and the dictionary of Equivalent norms, and the dictionary with equivalent metrics.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n1n \ge 1; the space Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with the norms of The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty and the metric d2d_2; a sequence (x(j))\bigl(x^{(j)}\bigr) in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; a point xRnx \in \mathbb{R}^{n}; a norm NN on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}; and a rational ε>0\varepsilon > 0.

[L1]

The comparison chain for n1n \ge 1 (The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n1n \ge 1 every norm NN on Rn\mathbb{R}^n satisfies N(x)Cx1N(x) \le C\lVert x\rVert_1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2d_2 clause 3): yy2y1ι(n)y\lVert y\rVert_\infty \le \lVert y\rVert_2 \le \lVert y\rVert_1 \le \iota(n)\lVert y\rVert_\infty for every yRny \in \mathbb{R}^{n}, where y=max{yk:k<n}\lVert y\rVert_\infty = \max\{|y_k| : k<n\} (The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty, Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set).

[L5]

All norms on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} are equivalent for n1n \ge 1 (For n1n \ge 1 all norms on Rn\mathbb{R}^n are equivalent), and equivalent norms have the same convergent sequences with the same limits and the same Cauchy sequences (Equivalent norms, and the dictionary with equivalent metrics).

[L6]

Limits in a metric space are unique, and every convergent sequence is Cauchy (A sequence in a metric space has at most one limit, Every convergent sequence in a metric space is Cauchy).

[L8]

A nonempty finite set of naturals has a greatest element, and every nonempty set of naturals has a least element (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set, The well-ordering principle).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every yRny \in \mathbb{R}^{n} and every k<nk<n: ykyy2|y_k| \le \lVert y\rVert_\infty \le \lVert y\rVert_2, the first inequality because y\lVert y\rVert_\infty bounds the set it is the maximum of.

L1
1.2

For every yRny \in \mathbb{R}^{n}: y2ι(n)y\lVert y\rVert_2 \le \iota(n)\lVert y\rVert_\infty, and y=yk0\lVert y\rVert_\infty = |y_{k_0}| for some k0<nk_0 < n.

L1
1.3

Conversely suppose xk(j)xkx^{(j)}_k \to x_k for every k<nk<n. Given a rational ε>0\varepsilon > 0, the real ε/ι(n)\varepsilon/\iota(n) is positive, so for each k<nk<n the set of indices KK such that xk(j)xk<ε/ι(n)|x^{(j)}_k - x_k| < \varepsilon/\iota(n) for all jKj \ge K is a nonempty set of naturals; let KkK_k be its least element, a determination rather than a selection, and put K:=max{K0,,Kn1}K := \max\{K_0,\dots,K_{n-1}\}, a maximum of a nonempty finite set of naturals.

L3L7L8
1.4

(Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_2) is complete, by citation and for n1n \ge 1 only.

L4
1.5

Let NN be any norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}. By [L5], NN and 2\lVert\cdot\rVert_2 are equivalent, so dNd_N and d2d_2 have the same Cauchy sequences and the same convergent sequences with the same limits.

L5
2.1

For all u,vRnu,v \in \mathbb{R}^{n} and k<nk<n: ukvkd2(u,v)ι(n)max{ukvk:k<n}|u_k - v_k| \le d_2(u,v) \le \iota(n)\max\{|u_k-v_k| : k<n\}, by steps 1.1 and 1.2 applied to y:=uvy := u - v.

step 1.1step 1.2L2
2.2

Hence a Cauchy sequence in (Rn,dN)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_N) is Cauchy in (Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_2), converges there by step 1.4, and therefore converges in (Rn,dN)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_N) to the same point; so (Rn,dN)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_N) is complete, which is clause 3.

step 1.4step 1.5L5L6
3.1

Suppose x(j)xx^{(j)} \to x in (Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_2) and fix k<nk<n. Given a rational ε>0\varepsilon > 0, take KK with d2(x(j),x)<εd_2(x^{(j)},x) < \varepsilon for jKj \ge K; then xk(j)xkd2(x(j),x)<ε|x^{(j)}_k - x_k| \le d_2(x^{(j)},x) < \varepsilon for jKj \ge K, so xk(j)xkx^{(j)}_k \to x_k.

step 2.1L3
3.2

For jKj \ge K and every k<nk<n we have xk(j)xk<ε/ι(n)|x^{(j)}_k - x_k| < \varepsilon/\iota(n); the maximum of these nn numbers is one of them, so max{xk(j)xk:k<n}<ε/ι(n)\max\{|x^{(j)}_k - x_k| : k<n\} < \varepsilon/\iota(n) and hence d2(x(j),x)<ι(n)ε/ι(n)=εd_2(x^{(j)},x) < \iota(n)\cdot\varepsilon/\iota(n) = \varepsilon by step 2.1. Therefore x(j)xx^{(j)} \to x.

step 2.1step 1.3L1L7
3.3

The same two estimates prove clause 2 with xx replaced by x(l)x^{(l)} throughout: if d2(x(j),x(l))<εd_2(x^{(j)},x^{(l)}) < \varepsilon for j,lKj,l \ge K then xk(j)xk(l)<ε|x^{(j)}_k - x^{(l)}_k| < \varepsilon for j,lKj,l \ge K and every k<nk<n; and conversely, choosing for each k<nk<n the least KkK_k beyond which xk(j)xk(l)<ε/ι(n)|x^{(j)}_k - x^{(l)}_k| < \varepsilon/\iota(n) for j,lKkj,l \ge K_k and taking K:=max{K0,,Kn1}K := \max\{K_0,\dots,K_{n-1}\} gives d2(x(j),x(l))<εd_2(x^{(j)},x^{(l)}) < \varepsilon for j,lKj,l \ge K.

step 2.1L3L7L8
4.1

Steps 3.1 and 3.2 are the two directions of clause 1.

step 3.1step 3.2
5.1

Clauses 1, 2 and 3 are steps 4.1, 3.3 and 2.2.

step 4.1step 3.3step 2.2

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 192 results over 36 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources