Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passverified 2026-08-10 (gpt-5.6-terra-codex-subscription)
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The finite and reverse triangle inequalities for a norm; and for n1n \ge 1 every norm NN on Rn\mathbb{R}^n satisfies N(x)Cx1N(x) \le C\lVert x\rVert_1 and is Lipschitz, hence continuous, for d2d_2

Statement

Clause 1 is about an arbitrary norm; clauses 2 to 4 are about Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with n1n \ge 1.

  1. Finite and reverse triangle inequalities. Let VV be a vector space over R\mathbb{R} and NN a norm on it (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms). For every pNp \in \mathbb{N} and every list u:pVu : p \to V (Linear combination of a finite list, and the span span(S)\operatorname{span}(S) as the smallest linear subspace containing SS), N(j<puj)    j<pN(uj),N\Bigl(\sum_{j<p} u_j\Bigr) \;\le\; \sum_{j<p} N(u_j), and for all u,wVu, w \in V, N(u)N(w)    N(uw).\bigl|N(u) - N(w)\bigr| \;\le\; N(u - w).

Now let nNn \in \mathbb{N} with n1n \ge 1, let Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} carry the norms of The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty and write ι\iota for the canonical natural (The canonical natural ι(n)=n1F\iota(n) = n \cdot 1_F of a field).

  1. Every norm is dominated by the 11-norm. Let NN be a norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} and put C:=max{N(ek):k<n}C := \max\{\, N(e_k) : k<n \,\}, a maximum over a nonempty finite set of reals (The standard list e:nFne : n \to F^{n} with ei(i)=1Fe_i(i) = 1_F and ei(j)=0Fe_i(j) = 0_F for jij \ne i is an ordered basis of FnF^{n}; hence dimFFn=n\dim_F F^{n} = n, and F0F^{0} is the zero space with basis \varnothing and dimension 00, Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum). Then C0C \ge 0 and N(x)    Cx1for every xRn.N(x) \;\le\; C\,\lVert x\rVert_1 \qquad \text{for every } x \in \mathbb{R}^{n}.
  2. The comparison chain. For every xRnx \in \mathbb{R}^{n}, x    x2    x1    ι(n)x,x1    ι(n)  x2.\lVert x\rVert_\infty \;\le\; \lVert x\rVert_2 \;\le\; \lVert x\rVert_1 \;\le\; \iota(n)\,\lVert x\rVert_\infty , \qquad \lVert x\rVert_1 \;\le\; \sqrt{\iota(n)}\;\lVert x\rVert_2 . In particular 1\lVert\cdot\rVert_1, 2\lVert\cdot\rVert_2 and \lVert\cdot\rVert_\infty are pairwise equivalent norms on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, with the constants displayed (Equivalent norms, and the dictionary with equivalent metrics).
  3. Every norm is Lipschitz for the Euclidean metric. With NN and CC as in clause 2, N:(Rn,d2)(R,dR)N : (\mathbb{R}^{n}, d_2) \to (\mathbb{R}, d_{\mathbb{R}}) is Lipschitz with constant Cι(n)C\sqrt{\iota(n)} (Lipschitz map, α\alpha-Hölder map for rational 0<α10 < \alpha \le 1, and contraction, Rn\mathbb{R}^n as the set of functions nRn \to \mathbb{R}, and d1d_1, d2d_2, dd_\infty are metrics on it, The absolute value makes R\mathbb{R} a metric space: d(x,y)=xyd(x,y) = |x-y| is a metric, its open balls are the intervals (xr,x+r)(x-r, x+r), and it is unbounded), hence uniformly continuous and continuous (Contraction implies Lipschitz implies uniformly continuous implies continuous; every Hölder map is uniformly continuous, and a Lipschitz map on a bounded space is Hölder for every exponent, Continuity of a map between metric spaces, at a point and globally, in the ε\varepsilon-δ\delta form).

Where n1n \ge 1 enters. Clauses 2 and 4 need the maximum defining CC to exist, and clause 3 mentions \lVert\cdot\rVert_\infty; at n=0n = 0 each is a maximum over the empty index set and does not exist, exactly as in Rn\mathbb{R}^n as the set of functions nRn \to \mathbb{R}, and d1d_1, d2d_2, dd_\infty are metrics on it and The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty. Clause 1 carries no hypothesis on the dimension and no hypothesis on the space.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A vector space VV over R\mathbb{R} with a norm NN (Vector space over a field, A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms); and, for clauses 2 to 4, a natural n1n \ge 1, the space Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, a norm NN on it, and vectors x,yRnx, y \in \mathbb{R}^{n}.

[L1]

The norm axioms: N(v)=0N(v) = 0 exactly when v=0Vv = 0_V; N(λv)=λN(v)N(\lambda v) = |\lambda|N(v); N(u+w)N(u)+N(w)N(u+w) \le N(u)+N(w); and N(v)0N(v) \ge 0 (A norm on a real vector space, the induced metric, and the dictionary with the metric axioms).

[L3]

The induction principle (The principle of mathematical induction).

[L4]

Laws of finite sums of reals (Laws of finite sums and finite products, Finite sums and finite products, by recursion): additivity, scaling, monotonicity, k<nλ=ι(n)λ\sum_{k<n}\lambda = \iota(n)\lambda, a sum of nonnegative terms is nonnegative, and every single term is at most such a sum.

[L6]

Maxima (Every nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum and a minimum, Maximum and minimum of a set): a nonempty finite set of reals has a maximum, which belongs to the set and bounds it above.

[L7]

The three norms (The pp-norms xp\lVert x\rVert_p for rational p1p \ge 1, and x\lVert x\rVert_\infty, Each p\lVert\cdot\rVert_p is a norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and the induced metrics are exactly d1d_1, d2d_2 and dd_\infty of the published metric-spaces page): x1=k<nxk\lVert x\rVert_1 = \sum_{k<n}|x_k|, x2=k<nxk2\lVert x\rVert_2 = \sqrt{\sum_{k<n}x_k^{2}}, x=max{xk:k<n}\lVert x\rVert_\infty = \max\{|x_k| : k<n\}, and each induces the correspondingly named published metric.

[L8]

Cauchy-Schwarz in root form (The Cauchy-Schwarz inequality for finite sums): k<nakbkk<nak2k<nbk2\bigl|\sum_{k<n}a_kb_k\bigr| \le \sqrt{\sum_{k<n}a_k^{2}}\sqrt{\sum_{k<n}b_k^{2}}.

[L9]

Square roots and squaring (Square roots exist: a unique a0\sqrt{a} \ge 0 with (a)2=a(\sqrt{a})^2 = a; the positives are {x2:x0}\{x^2 : x \neq 0\}, Squaring is monotone on the nonnegatives): every c0c \ge 0 has a unique c0\sqrt{c} \ge 0 with (c)2=c(\sqrt{c})^{2} = c; for a,b0a,b \ge 0, aba \le b exactly when a2b2a^{2} \le b^{2}.

[L10]

Absolute value (Basic properties of the absolute value): t0|t| \ge 0, t2=t2|t|^{2} = t^{2}, st=st|st| = |s||t|, t=t|-t| = |t|, and t|t| equals tt or t-t.

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The finite triangle inequality holds by induction on pp: at p=0p = 0 both sides are 00, since j<0uj=0V\sum_{j<0}u_j = 0_V and N(0V)=0N(0_V) = 0 and the empty real sum is 00; and if N(j<puj)j<pN(uj)N(\sum_{j<p}u_j) \le \sum_{j<p}N(u_j), then N(j<p+1uj)=N(j<puj+up)N(j<puj)+N(up)j<pN(uj)+N(up)=j<p+1N(uj)N(\sum_{j<p+1}u_j) = N(\sum_{j<p}u_j + u_p) \le N(\sum_{j<p}u_j) + N(u_p) \le \sum_{j<p}N(u_j) + N(u_p) = \sum_{j<p+1}N(u_j).

L1L2L3L4
1.2

For u,wVu, w \in V: N(u)=N((uw)+w)N(uw)+N(w)N(u) = N((u-w)+w) \le N(u-w) + N(w), so N(u)N(w)N(uw)N(u)-N(w) \le N(u-w); and N(wu)=N((1)(uw))=1N(uw)=N(uw)N(w-u) = N((-1)(u-w)) = |-1|N(u-w) = N(u-w), so the same argument with uu and ww exchanged gives N(w)N(u)N(uw)N(w)-N(u) \le N(u-w). Since N(u)N(w)|N(u)-N(w)| is one of N(u)N(w)N(u)-N(w) and N(w)N(u)N(w)-N(u), the reverse triangle inequality follows, completing clause 1.

L1L2L10
1.3

For every j<nj<n: xj2k<nxk2x_j^{2} \le \sum_{k<n}x_k^{2}, since every single term of a sum of nonnegative terms is at most the sum; taking nonnegative square roots and using xj2=xj2|x_j|^{2} = x_j^{2} gives xjx2|x_j| \le \lVert x\rVert_2.

L4L7L9L10
1.4

For every j<nj<n: xjk<nxk=x1|x_j| \le \sum_{k<n}|x_k| = \lVert x\rVert_1, again because a single term is at most the sum.

L4L7L10
1.5

k<nxkk<nx=ι(n)x\sum_{k<n}|x_k| \le \sum_{k<n}\lVert x\rVert_\infty = \iota(n)\lVert x\rVert_\infty, since xkx|x_k| \le \lVert x\rVert_\infty for every k<nk<n and a constant list sums to ι(n)\iota(n) times its value; so x1ι(n)x\lVert x\rVert_1 \le \iota(n)\lVert x\rVert_\infty.

L4L6L7L11
1.6

Instantiating [L8] at ak:=xka_k := |x_k| and bk:=1b_k := 1 gives x1=k<nxk1k<nxk2k<n1=x2ι(n)\lVert x\rVert_1 = \bigl|\sum_{k<n}|x_k|\cdot 1\bigr| \le \sqrt{\sum_{k<n}|x_k|^{2}}\,\sqrt{\sum_{k<n}1} = \lVert x\rVert_2\sqrt{\iota(n)}.

L4L7L8L10
1.7

The set {N(ek):k<n}\{N(e_k) : k<n\} is a nonempty finite set of reals because n1n \ge 1, so C=max{N(ek):k<n}C = \max\{N(e_k) : k<n\} exists, belongs to the set, satisfies N(ek)CN(e_k) \le C for every k<nk<n, and is 0\ge 0 since every value of NN is.

L1L5L6
1.8

x=i<nxieix = \sum_{i<n} x_i e_i, the coordinate list of xx with respect to the ordered basis ee being ix(i)=xii \mapsto x(i) = x_i.

L5
2.1

x\lVert x\rVert_\infty is one of the numbers xj|x_j| with j<nj<n, so step 1.3 gives xx2\lVert x\rVert_\infty \le \lVert x\rVert_2.

step 1.3L6L7
2.2

k<nxk2=k<nxkxkk<nxkx1=x1k<nxk=x12\sum_{k<n}x_k^{2} = \sum_{k<n}|x_k|\,|x_k| \le \sum_{k<n}|x_k|\,\lVert x\rVert_1 = \lVert x\rVert_1\sum_{k<n}|x_k| = \lVert x\rVert_1^{2}, using step 1.4 termwise, monotonicity and scaling; taking nonnegative square roots gives x2x1\lVert x\rVert_2 \le \lVert x\rVert_1.

step 1.4L4L7L9L10
2.3

Applying step 1.1 to the list ixieii \mapsto x_i e_i and then (N2): N(x)=N(i<nxiei)i<nN(xiei)=i<nxiN(ei)i<nxiC=Cx1N(x) = N\bigl(\sum_{i<n}x_ie_i\bigr) \le \sum_{i<n}N(x_ie_i) = \sum_{i<n}|x_i|\,N(e_i) \le \sum_{i<n}|x_i|\,C = C\lVert x\rVert_1, the last inequality by monotonicity from step 1.7. This is clause 2.

step 1.1step 1.7step 1.8L1L4L7
3.1

Steps 2.1, 2.2, 1.5 and 1.6 are the four inequalities of clause 3; since ι(n)>0\iota(n) > 0 and ι(n)>0\sqrt{\iota(n)} > 0, they exhibit positive constants in both directions for each of the three pairs, so the three norms are pairwise equivalent.

step 1.5step 1.6step 2.1step 2.2L11L9
3.2

By step 1.2 applied on Rn\mathbb{R}^{n}, then step 2.3, then step 1.6: N(x)N(y)N(xy)Cxy1Cι(n)  xy2\bigl|N(x)-N(y)\bigr| \le N(x-y) \le C\lVert x-y\rVert_1 \le C\sqrt{\iota(n)}\;\lVert x-y\rVert_2.

step 1.2step 1.6step 2.3L4
4.1

Since xy2=d2(x,y)\lVert x-y\rVert_2 = d_2(x,y) and N(x)N(y)=dR(N(x),N(y))\bigl|N(x)-N(y)\bigr| = d_{\mathbb{R}}(N(x),N(y)), step 3.2 says exactly that NN is Lipschitz with the nonnegative constant Cι(n)C\sqrt{\iota(n)}, hence uniformly continuous and continuous; this is clause 4, and with steps 1.2, 2.3 and 3.1 all four clauses are proved.

step 1.2step 2.3step 3.1step 3.2L7L12

Remarks

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 177 results over 28 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources