Alphabeta Math
False statementConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

FALSE: continuity alone makes the regular-patch surface-area formula applicable

Statement

Every continuous injective parametrization on a compact Jordan region satisfies the regular-patch cross-product surface-area formula.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The closed unit disc D and φ(u,v)=(u,v,(u,v)2).

[L2]

A partial derivative is a one-variable derivative along a coordinate line (Directional derivatives and partial derivatives of a map URmRn), while a regular patch must be C1 on a neighbourhood and have a nonzero parameter cross product in the interior (Regular parametrized surface patches on compact Jordan parameter regions).

Refutation

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], φ is continuous, and its first two coordinates make it injective on D.

givenL1
1.2

Along v=0, the third component is u. Its right difference quotient at 0 is 1 and its left difference quotient is 1, so the u-partial derivative of φ does not exist at the interior point (0,0) by [L2].

givenL1L2algebra
2.1

Thus the cross-product integrand required by [L2] is unavailable at an interior point despite continuity and injectivity, refuting the statement. A polar cone parametrization moves the apex failure to a parameter-boundary point and is a different parametrization.

step 1.1step 1.2L2

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

42 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources