Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The set of rearrangement sums of a convergent series in Rn\mathbb{R}^n is a nonempty subset of the affine subspace s+Γs + \Gamma^{\perp}

Statement

Let nNn \in \mathbb{N} with n1n \ge 1, let (xk)(x_k) be a sequence in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} whose series converges (Series of vectors in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, absolute convergence, rearrangement, and the set of rearrangement sums) and write s:=k=0xks := \sum_{k=0}^{\infty}x_k. Let Γ\Gamma and Γ\Gamma^{\perp} be as in The subspace Γ\Gamma of directions along which a series converges absolutely, and its orthogonal complement Γ\Gamma^{\perp}. Then:

  1. Nonemptiness. sS(x)s \in \mathcal{S}(x), so S(x)\mathcal{S}(x) \ne \varnothing.
  2. Containment. S(x)    s+Γ,\mathcal{S}(x) \;\subseteq\; s + \Gamma^{\perp}, the affine subspace through ss with direction Γ\Gamma^{\perp} (The subspace Γ\Gamma of directions along which a series converges absolutely, and its orthogonal complement Γ\Gamma^{\perp}). Equivalently, tsΓt - s \in \Gamma^{\perp} for every rearrangement sum tt.
  3. The absolutely convergent case. If xk\sum x_k converges absolutely then Γ=Rn\Gamma = \mathbb{R}^{n}, Γ={0}\Gamma^{\perp} = \{0\}, the affine subspace is the single point {s}\{s\}, and S(x)={s}\mathcal{S}(x) = \{s\}.
  4. The one-dimensional conditionally convergent case. Let n=1n = 1 and identify R1\mathbb{R}^{1} with R\mathbb{R} as in Series of vectors in Rn\mathbb{R}^n, absolute convergence, rearrangement, and the set of rearrangement sums. If xk\sum x_k converges conditionally (Absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent series, and the general starting index) then Γ={0}\Gamma = \{0\}, Γ=R1\Gamma^{\perp} = \mathbb{R}^{1}, and the containment of clause 2 is an equality, S(x)=s+Γ=R1\mathcal{S}(x) = s + \Gamma^{\perp} = \mathbb{R}^{1}, by the published The Riemann series theorem: a conditionally convergent real series has, for every cRc \in \mathbb{R}, a rearrangement with sum cc, and rearrangements diverging to ++\infty, to -\infty, and oscillating with any prescribed lim inflim sup\liminf \le \limsup in R\overline{\mathbb{R}}.

What this theorem does not say, stated here and repeated in the Remarks. It proves a containment and nothing more. Whether S(x)\mathcal{S}(x) is all of s+Γs + \Gamma^{\perp} when n2n \ge 2 is not settled anywhere on this page, and no item on this page asserts anything about it in either direction. Clause 4 is the case n=1n = 1, where the answer is supplied by a published theorem about the real line; it is not evidence for any statement in higher dimensions.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A natural n1n \ge 1; a sequence (xk)(x_k) in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} with xk\sum x_k convergent of sum ss; a bijection σ\sigma of N\mathbb{N}; a vector aΓa \in \Gamma; the partial sums sN=k<Nxks_N = \sum_{k<N}x_k and sNσ=k<Nxσ(k)s^{\sigma}_N = \sum_{k<N}x_{\sigma(k)}.

[L2]

Γ\Gamma and Γ\Gamma^{\perp} are linear subspaces; aΓa \in \Gamma means ka,xk\sum_k|\langle a,x_k\rangle| converges; Γ=Rn\Gamma = \mathbb{R}^{n} exactly when xk\sum x_k converges absolutely; and s+Ws + W denotes the coset of a linear subspace WW (The subspace Γ\Gamma of directions along which a series converges absolutely, and its orthogonal complement Γ\Gamma^{\perp}, Linear subspace of a vector space).

[L5]

Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: an absolutely convergent real series has, for every bijection σ\sigma of N\mathbb{N}, a rearrangement converging to the same sum (Dirichlet's rearrangement theorem: an absolutely convergent series converges unconditionally, and every rearrangement of it has the same sum, Absolutely convergent and conditionally convergent series, and the general starting index).

[L8]

An absolutely convergent series in Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} converges, every rearrangement converges to the same sum, and S(x)\mathcal{S}(x) is then a single point (An absolutely convergent series in Rn\mathbb{R}^n converges, and every rearrangement converges to the same sum).

[L9]

Absolute value and order arithmetic: uv=uv|uv| = |u||v|, u0|u| \ge 0, and u>0u>0 gives u1>0u^{-1}>0 (Basic properties of the absolute value, Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The identity map of N\mathbb{N} is a bijection and the rearrangement along it is the original series, so sS(x)s \in \mathcal{S}(x) and clause 1 holds.

L1
1.2

For every aRna \in \mathbb{R}^{n} and every finite list u:pRnu : p \to \mathbb{R}^{n}, a,j<puj=j<pa,uj\bigl\langle a, \sum_{j<p}u_j\bigr\rangle = \sum_{j<p}\langle a, u_j\rangle: at p=0p=0 both sides are 00, and the successor step is additivity of the inner product in its second argument.

L3L4
1.3

If uNuu_N \to u in (Rn,d2)(\mathbb{R}^{n},d_2) then a,uNa,u\langle a, u_N\rangle \to \langle a,u\rangle in R\mathbb{R}, since a,uNa,u=a,uNua2uNu2\bigl|\langle a,u_N\rangle - \langle a,u\rangle\bigr| = \bigl|\langle a, u_N-u\rangle\bigr| \le \lVert a\rVert_2\,\lVert u_N-u\rVert_2, so a tolerance ε/(a2+1)\varepsilon/(\lVert a\rVert_2+1) on the right serves for ε\varepsilon on the left.

L3L7L9
1.4

Now let n=1n = 1 and suppose xk\sum x_k converges conditionally, so the real series k(xk)0\sum_k (x_k)_0 converges and k(xk)0\sum_k|(x_k)_0| diverges. For aR1a \in \mathbb{R}^{1}, a,xk=a0(xk)0\langle a, x_k\rangle = a_0 (x_k)_0 and a,xk=a0(xk)0|\langle a,x_k\rangle| = |a_0|\,|(x_k)_0|; if a00a_0 \ne 0 then convergence of ka0(xk)0\sum_k |a_0||(x_k)_0| would give convergence of k(xk)0\sum_k |(x_k)_0| after multiplying by the positive 1/a01/|a_0|, which is false, so aΓa \in \Gamma forces a0=0a_0 = 0; and a=0a = 0 does lie in Γ\Gamma. Hence Γ={0}\Gamma = \{0\}.

L1L2L9
2.1

Let tS(x)t \in \mathcal{S}(x), say sNσts^{\sigma}_N \to t for a bijection σ\sigma, and let aΓa \in \Gamma. By steps 1.2 and 1.3, a,t=limNa,sNσ=limNk<Na,xσ(k)\langle a,t\rangle = \lim_N \langle a, s^{\sigma}_N\rangle = \lim_N \sum_{k<N}\langle a, x_{\sigma(k)}\rangle, so the real series ka,xσ(k)\sum_k\langle a,x_{\sigma(k)}\rangle converges with sum a,t\langle a,t\rangle.

step 1.2step 1.3L1L7
2.2

In the same way a,s=limNa,sN=limNk<Na,xk\langle a, s\rangle = \lim_N\langle a, s_N\rangle = \lim_N\sum_{k<N}\langle a,x_k\rangle, so ka,xk\sum_k\langle a,x_k\rangle converges with sum a,s\langle a,s\rangle.

step 1.2step 1.3L7
2.3

With Γ={0}\Gamma = \{0\} the condition defining Γ\Gamma^{\perp} is 0,y=0\langle 0,y\rangle = 0, which holds for every yy, so Γ=R1\Gamma^{\perp} = \mathbb{R}^{1} and s+Γ=R1s + \Gamma^{\perp} = \mathbb{R}^{1}.

step 1.4L2L3
3.1

The real sequence ka,xσ(k)k \mapsto \langle a, x_{\sigma(k)}\rangle is the rearrangement along σ\sigma of the sequence ka,xkk \mapsto \langle a,x_k\rangle, and the latter series converges absolutely because aΓa \in \Gamma; so by Dirichlet's theorem the two series have the same sum.

step 2.1step 2.2L2L5
3.2

By the Riemann series theorem applied to the conditionally convergent real series k(xk)0\sum_k (x_k)_0, every real cc is the sum of some rearrangement of it; transporting along the identification of R\mathbb{R} with R1\mathbb{R}^{1}, every element of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} lies in S(x)\mathcal{S}(x). So S(x)=R1=s+Γ\mathcal{S}(x) = \mathbb{R}^{1} = s + \Gamma^{\perp}, which with steps 1.4 and 2.3 is clause 4.

step 1.4step 2.3L1L6L7
4.1

Combining steps 2.1, 2.2 and 3.1 gives a,t=a,s\langle a,t\rangle = \langle a,s\rangle, hence a,ts=0\langle a, t-s\rangle = 0 by bilinearity.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1L3
5.1

Since aΓa \in \Gamma was arbitrary, tsΓt-s \in \Gamma^{\perp}, that is ts+Γt \in s + \Gamma^{\perp}; as tS(x)t \in \mathcal{S}(x) was arbitrary, clause 2 holds.

step 4.1L2
6.1

Suppose xk\sum x_k converges absolutely. Then Γ=Rn\Gamma = \mathbb{R}^{n}, so any yΓy \in \Gamma^{\perp} satisfies y,y=0\langle y,y\rangle = 0 and hence y=0y = 0; thus Γ={0}\Gamma^{\perp} = \{0\} and s+Γ={s}s + \Gamma^{\perp} = \{s\}. Moreover S(x)={s}\mathcal{S}(x) = \{s\} by [L8], so clause 3 holds and the containment of clause 2 is an equality in this case.

step 5.1L2L3L8
7.1

Clauses 1, 2, 3 and 4 are steps 1.1, 5.1, 6.1 and 3.2.

step 1.1step 5.1step 6.1step 3.2

Remarks

  • This theorem proves containment only, and the reverse inclusion is not proved, assumed, or asserted anywhere on this page. For n2n \ge 2 the question whether every point of s+Γs + \Gamma^{\perp} is a rearrangement sum is open as far as this library is concerned. It is not open in the mathematical literature, and this page deliberately states nothing about what the literature says, exactly as the published The same question in Rd\mathbb{R}^d: what the set of rearrangement sums looks like, and why that answer is not reachable at this point in the reading order declines to. What is missing here is machinery, not effort: every route known to the author of this page passes through the orthogonal decomposition of a finite-dimensional inner product space and through a separation argument for convex sets, and neither exists in this library — the first belongs to a page earlier in the plan order that is not yet built, and the second to no planned page at all. See Conventions of this page, the standing n1n \ge 1 hypothesis, and what is taken up elsewhere in the reading order.

  • The title claims exactly clause 2 and clause 1, and no more. A title asserting that S(x)\mathcal{S}(x) is the affine subspace would assert the reverse inclusion, which is not proved here.

  • Clause 4 is the published one-dimensional dichotomy seen from this page. Over R\mathbb{R} a convergent series is either absolutely convergent, and then Γ\Gamma is everything and S\mathcal{S} is a point (clause 3), or conditionally convergent, and then Γ\Gamma is {0}\{0\} and S\mathcal{S} is the whole line (clause 4). Both extremes are consistent with clause 2, and both are equalities; that is a fact about dimension 11, where a linear subspace of R1\mathbb{R}^{1} is {0}\{0\} or everything and there is no room in between.

  • What the containment already rules out. Even without the reverse inclusion, clause 2 forbids a rearrangement sum from leaving the affine subspace. That is enough to refute the naive Rn\mathbb{R}^{n} analogue of the Riemann series theorem, and the companion page does so with an elementary witness, using clause 2 and nothing further.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 213 results over 44 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources