How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Christoffel formula for the levi civita connection
Statement
In coordinates for a Riemannian metric with matrix and inverse , its Levi–Civita symbols are
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A supplied Riemannian metric and a coordinate chart.
The unique Levi–Civita connection exists (Fundamental theorem of riemannian geometry).
It obeys the Koszul formula (Koszul formula is necessary for a levi civita connection).
Symbols are its coordinate derivative coefficients (Christoffel symbols of an affine connection).
Coordinate fields commute (Coordinate formula for the Lie bracket).
Proof
Insert in the Koszul identity. All bracket terms vanish, giving .
Multiply by and sum over . Since , division by two gives the claimed expression. Constant metric coefficients give zero symbols, dimension one gives , and dimension zero gives an empty formula. Inverting a positive-definite matrix is legitimate at every point, including boundary points.
Depends on
Used by
- A cut point that is not conjugate because two minimizers arrive Counterexample
- Corner terms are required even in the plane Counterexample
- Ricci lower bound does not control every sectional curvature in dimension at least three Counterexample
- The same intrinsic planar strip can have different extrinsic curvature after bending Counterexample
- A deformed sphere has the same total curvature Example
- A flat torus showing simple connectedness is needed for global exp injectivity Example
- A great sphere is totally geodesic Example
- Area defect of a hyperbolic geodesic triangle Example
- Area excess of a spherical geodesic triangle Example
- Christoffel symbols in polar coordinates Example
- Curvature of a Riemannian product Example
- Cut locus of a point on a flat circle Example
- Cut locus on a flat rectangular torus from the Dirichlet cell Example
- Euclidean space has zero curvature Example
- Flat torus and zero Euler characteristic Example
- Gauss-Bonnet for a spherical cap Example
- Gaussian curvature of a surface of revolution Example
- Geodesics in the Poincare upper half-plane Example
- Geodesics of a Riemannian product Example
- Hopf–Rinow on a flat cylinder Example
- Hyperbolic space has negative constant sectional curvature Example
- Jacobi fields in euclidean space Example
- Levi civita connection of a conformal plane metric Example
- Principal curvatures of a round sphere Example
- Projective-plane curvature via a hemisphere Example
- Straight lines as Euclidean geodesics Example
- The catenoid has zero mean curvature but is not totally geodesic Example
- The cylinder has zero Gaussian curvature but nonzero second fundamental form Example
- The euclidean levi civita connection Example
- The exponential map of a flat torus is not injective Example
- The punctured Euclidean plane is geodesically incomplete Example
- The round sphere has positive constant sectional curvature Example
- Total curvature of a round sphere Example
- A geodesic stops minimizing exactly at its first conjugate point False statement
- Cartan hadamard says exp p is injective without simple connectedness False statement
- Every affinely reparametrized geodesic remains unit speed False statement
- Every geodesic segment is globally length minimizing False statement
- Every vector field along a geodesic is a Jacobi field False statement
- Geodesic curvature need not equal ambient curve curvature False statement
- Ricci curvature and scalar curvature determine the full Riemann tensor in every dimension False statement
…and 13 more results.
Dependency tree · two levels
12 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)