How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Levi civita connection of a conformal plane metric
Example
For a smooth real function on an open subset of , the metric has where and the last index uses the Cartesian Euclidean convention. For , the nonzero entries are , , .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The smooth function and the positive conformal metric on its domain.
The Levi–Civita coefficient formula contracts first metric derivatives with half the inverse metric (Christoffel formula for the levi civita connection).
Verification
The metric and inverse matrices are and . Since , substitution in [F1] cancels the factors , and and gives , exactly the asserted formula.
For , one has . The formula gives the four listed entries and . At all entries vanish, whereas at the four listed entries are . Constant gives zero coefficients everywhere. The conformal factor is strictly positive for every real , so this calculation never inverts a degenerate metric.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
5 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Ved Datar, Lectures on Riemannian Geometry (standard reference, not scraped)