How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map
Statement
Let be a covering, let be a path, and let satisfy . There is a unique path with and .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.
Let be a covering and continuous. A lift of through is a continuous map with . This includes lifts of paths and of homotopies ; an initial lift prescribes the restriction at time (def-homotopy-relative-and-path-homotopy, def-path-connected). (Lifts of maps, paths, and homotopies through a covering map).
Let be a compact metric space (def-metric-compactness, def-metric-space) and let be an open cover of . Then there is a real , a Lebesgue number for , such that every nonempty with (def-metric-bounded-diameter) satisfies for some . Diameters of nonempty subsets of are defined because a compact space is bounded (thm-compact-subset-is-closed-and-bounded) and a subset of a bounded set is bounded. No choice principle is used. (Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than lies inside a single member of the cover).
Let , and be topological spaces, with subspaces carrying the subspace topology (def-subspace-topology-top). Then: 1. Composites. If and are continuous (def-continuous-map-top) then is continuous. 2. Open cover. Let be a function and let be a family of open subsets of with . If is continuous for every , then is continuous. 3. Finite closed cover. Let be a function, let and let be closed subsets of with . If is continuous for every , then is continuous. The converses of claims 2 and 3 hold with no hypothesis on the cover at all: every restriction of a continuous map to a subspace is continuous (def-subspace-topology-top). The finiteness in claim 3 is not removable; see the remarks. (Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous).
Let be a topological space (def-topological-space). An open cover of is a family of open sets with ; a subcover of is a subfamily that is itself an open cover; and is compact when every open cover of it has a finite subcover. (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).
Proof
Pull back evenly covered neighbourhoods along the path to obtain an open cover of the compact interval, choose a Lebesgue subdivision, and lift successively sheet by sheet from the prescribed initial point.
Agreement at subdivision endpoints gives a continuous pasted path; sheet uniqueness proves uniqueness, including constant paths.
The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.
Depends on
- Lifts of maps, paths, and homotopies through a covering map
- Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a $\delta > 0$ such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than $\delta$ lies inside a single member of the cover
- Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous
- Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right
Used by
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 83 results over 15 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- J. Peter May, A Concise Course in Algebraic Topology, Ch. 3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Marco Gualtieri, MAT1300 Week 4 Term 2, §1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)