Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-09-29
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map

Statement

Let p:E→B be a covering, let α:I→B be a path, and let e0∈E satisfy p(e0)=α(0). There is a unique path α~:I→E with α~(0)=e0 and p∘α~=α.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.

[F1]

Let p:E→B be a covering and f:Y→B continuous. A lift of f through p is a continuous map f~:Y→E with p∘f~=f. This includes lifts of paths I→B and of homotopies Y×I→B; an initial lift prescribes the restriction at time 0 (def-homotopy-relative-and-path-homotopy, def-path-connected). (Lifts of maps, paths, and homotopies through a covering map).

[F2]

Let (X,d) be a compact metric space (def-metric-compactness, def-metric-space) and let U be an open cover of X. Then there is a real δ>0, a Lebesgue number for U, such that every nonempty A⊆X with diam⁡(A)<δ (def-metric-bounded-diameter) satisfies A⊆U for some U∈U. Diameters of nonempty subsets of X are defined because a compact space is bounded (thm-compact-subset-is-closed-and-bounded) and a subset of a bounded set is bounded. No choice principle is used. (Every open cover of a compact metric space has a Lebesgue number: a δ>0 such that every nonempty subset of diameter less than δ lies inside a single member of the cover).

[F3]

Let X, Y and Z be topological spaces, with subspaces carrying the subspace topology (def-subspace-topology-top). Then: 1. Composites. If f:X→Y and g:Y→Z are continuous (def-continuous-map-top) then g∘f:X→Z is continuous. 2. Open cover. Let f:X→Y be a function and let { Ui:i∈I } be a family of open subsets of X with ⋃i∈IUi=X. If f∣Ui:Ui→Y is continuous for every i∈I, then f is continuous. 3. Finite closed cover. Let f:X→Y be a function, let n≥1 and let F1,…,Fn be closed subsets of X with F1∪⋯∪Fn=X. If f∣Fk:Fk→Y is continuous for every k, then f is continuous. The converses of claims 2 and 3 hold with no hypothesis on the cover at all: every restriction of a continuous map to a subspace is continuous (def-subspace-topology-top). The finiteness in claim 3 is not removable; see the remarks. (Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous).

[F4]

Let (X,T) be a topological space (def-topological-space). An open cover of (X,T) is a family U⊆T of open sets with X=⋃U; a subcover of U is a subfamily that is itself an open cover; and (X,T) is compact when every open cover of it has a finite subcover. (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).

[F5]

Every point of B has an evenly covered open neighbourhood U: p−1(U) is a disjoint union of open sheets V, and p∣V:V→U is a homeomorphism. (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings).

[F7]

For every real x there is an integer m≥1 with x<m. (Every complete ordered field is Archimedean).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF2F4F5F6F7

For every evenly covered open U⊆B, the inverse image α−1(U) is open in I. These inverse images cover I by [F5]. Since I is compact by [F6], [F2] gives a Lebesgue number δ>0 for this cover. Apply [F7] to 1/δ and choose an integer m≥1 with m>1/δ, hence 1/m<δ; put tj=j/m for 0≤j≤m. Each Jj=[tj,tj+1] has diameter 1/m<δ; thus its image under α lies in some evenly covered open Uj. For each selected Uj, also fix one of its disjoint-sheet decompositions supplied by [F5]. There are only finitely many Jj, so all these selections are finite successive choices and need no axiom of choice.

2.1step 1.1F1F3F5

Set e0 as in the Statement. Suppose ej∈E has already been defined with p(ej)=α(tj). Because α(tj)∈Uj, exactly one sheet Vj over Uj contains ej. Define βj=(p∣Vj)−1∘α∣Jj and ej+1=βj(tj+1). The inverse sheet map and α∣Jj are continuous, so βj is continuous; moreover βj(tj)=ej and p∘βj=α∣Jj. Finite induction constructs all m pieces. Consecutive pieces agree at their common endpoint, so they define a function α~:I→E. The Jj form a finite closed cover; [F3] makes this function continuous. It starts at e0 and satisfies p∘α~=α, hence is a lift.

3.1step 2.1F1F5F6∎

Let γ:I→E be another lift starting at e0. Inductively assume γ(tj)=ej. On connected Jj from [F6], the image of γ lies in p−1(Uj), the disjoint union of its open sheets. The inverse image under γ∣Jj of any one sheet is open in Jj, and its complement is the union of the inverse images of all the other sheets, also open. Thus each sheet inverse image is both open and closed in connected Jj. Since γ(tj)=ej∈Vj, the entire γ(Jj) lies in Vj. On that sheet p∣Vj is one-to-one, so γ∣Jj=(p∣Vj)−1∘α∣Jj=βj. This also gives γ(tj+1)=ej+1 and completes the induction. Hence γ=α~ on I. The argument also applies when α is constant.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

64 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources