Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence and uniqueness of homotopy lifts through a covering map

Statement

Let p:E→B be a covering, H:Y×I→B a homotopy, and H~0:Y→E a lift of H(−,0). There is a unique lift H~:Y×I→E of H extending H~0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.

[F1]

Let p:E→B be a covering and f:Y→B continuous. A lift of f through p is a continuous map f~:Y→E with p∘f~=f. This includes lifts of paths I→B and of homotopies Y×I→B; an initial lift prescribes the restriction at time 0 (def-homotopy-relative-and-path-homotopy, def-path-connected). (Lifts of maps, paths, and homotopies through a covering map).

[F2]

Let p:E→B be a covering, let α:I→B be a path, and let e0∈E satisfy p(e0)=α(0). There is a unique path α~:I→E with α~(0)=e0 and p∘α~=α. (Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map).

[F3]

The product set. Let I be a set and let Xi be a set for each i∈I. The product is ∏i∈IXi  :=  { x:x is a function with domain I and x(i)∈Xi for every i∈I }, and we write xi:=x(i), the i-th coordinate of x. Two elements of the product are equal exactly when they agree at every index, functions being equal when they have the same domain and the same values. For j∈I the j-th projection is πj:∏i∈IXi→Xj,πj(x):=xj.. The product topology TΠ on ∏iXi is the initial topology of the projections: the topology generated by the subbasis {πi−1[U]:i∈I, U∈Ti}. Finite intersections of subbasic sets form a basis for it, and they are exactly the boxes ∏i∈IUi with every Ui open in Xi and Ui=Xi for all but finitely many i. (The product set ∏i∈IXi of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space).

[F4]

Let X, Y and Z be topological spaces, with subspaces carrying the subspace topology (def-subspace-topology-top). Then: 1. Composites. If f:X→Y and g:Y→Z are continuous (def-continuous-map-top) then g∘f:X→Z is continuous. 2. Open cover. Let f:X→Y be a function and let { Ui:i∈I } be a family of open subsets of X with ⋃i∈IUi=X. If f∣Ui:Ui→Y is continuous for every i∈I, then f is continuous. 3. Finite closed cover. Let f:X→Y be a function, let n≥1 and let F1,…,Fn be closed subsets of X with F1∪⋯∪Fn=X. If f∣Fk:Fk→Y is continuous for every k, then f is continuous. The converses of claims 2 and 3 hold with no hypothesis on the cover at all: every restriction of a continuous map to a subspace is continuous (def-subspace-topology-top). The finiteness in claim 3 is not removable; see the remarks. (Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous).

[F5]

Let (X,T) be a topological space (def-topological-space). An open cover of (X,T) is a family U⊆T of open sets with X=⋃U; a subcover of U is a subfamily that is itself an open cover; and (X,T) is compact when every open cover of it has a finite subcover. (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1givenF1F2F5

For a homotopy H:Y×I→X and a lift at time zero, use evenly covered neighbourhoods and compactness of the interval to extend the lift over successive time strips locally in Y.

2.1step 1.1F1F4F3

Pasting gives a global lift, and the set of points where two lifts agree is open and closed on each vertical interval, yielding uniqueness.

3.1step 2.1∎

The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources