Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Existence and uniqueness of homotopy lifts through a covering map

Statement

Let p:EB be a covering, H:Y×IB a homotopy, and H~0:YE a lift of H(,0). There is a unique lift H~:Y×IE of H extending H~0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.

[F1]

Let p:EB be a covering and f:YB continuous. A lift of f through p is a continuous map f~:YE with pf~=f. This includes lifts of paths IB and of homotopies Y×IB; an initial lift prescribes the restriction at time 0 (def-homotopy-relative-and-path-homotopy, def-path-connected). (Lifts of maps, paths, and homotopies through a covering map).

[F2]

Let p:EB be a covering, let α:IB be a path, and let e0E satisfy p(e0)=α(0). There is a unique path α~:IE with α~(0)=e0 and pα~=α. (Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map).

[F3]

The product set. Let I be a set and let Xi be a set for each iI. The product is iIXi  :=  {x:x is a function with domain I and x(i)Xi for every iI}, and we write xi:=x(i), the i-th coordinate of x. Two elements of the product are equal exactly when they agree at every index, functions being equal when they have the same domain and the same values. For jI the j-th projection is πj:iIXiXj,πj(x):=xj.. The product topology TΠ on iXi is the initial topology of the projections: the topology generated by the subbasis {πi1[U]:iI, UTi}. Finite intersections of subbasic sets form a basis for it, and they are exactly the boxes iIUi with every Ui open in Xi and Ui=Xi for all but finitely many i. (The product set iIXi of functions choosing a point in each factor, the projections, the box topology, and the product topology as the initial topology of the projections; the empty product is a one-point space).

[F4]

Let X, Y and Z be topological spaces, with subspaces carrying the subspace topology (def-subspace-topology-top). Then: 1. Composites. If f:XY and g:YZ are continuous (def-continuous-map-top) then gf:XZ is continuous. 2. Open cover. Let f:XY be a function and let {Ui:iI} be a family of open subsets of X with iIUi=X. If fUi:UiY is continuous for every iI, then f is continuous. 3. Finite closed cover. Let f:XY be a function, let n1 and let F1,,Fn be closed subsets of X with F1Fn=X. If fFk:FkY is continuous for every k, then f is continuous. The converses of claims 2 and 3 hold with no hypothesis on the cover at all: every restriction of a continuous map to a subspace is continuous (def-subspace-topology-top). The finiteness in claim 3 is not removable; see the remarks. (Continuity may be checked on any open cover, and on any finite closed cover; composites of continuous maps are continuous).

[F5]

Let (X,T) be a topological space (def-topological-space). An open cover of (X,T) is a family UT of open sets with X=U; a subcover of U is a subfamily that is itself an open cover; and (X,T) is compact when every open cover of it has a finite subcover. (Open cover, subcover, and compact topological space; a compact subset is a subspace that is compact in its own right).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For a homotopy H:Y×IX and a lift at time zero, use evenly covered neighbourhoods and compactness of the interval to extend the lift over successive time strips locally in Y.

givenF1F2F5
2.1

Pasting gives a global lift, and the set of points where two lifts agree is open and closed on each vertical interval, yielding uniqueness.

step 1.1F1F4F3
3.1

The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.

step 2.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 62 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources