Alphabeta Math
ExampleConstruction: Literature-sourcedVerification: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-08-16
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The projected unit interval is not nullhomotopic in R/Z

Example

The loop t[t] in R/Z is not nullhomotopic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.

[F1]

For the quotient by integer translation, q:RR/Z is a covering map, and every deck transformation is a unique translation xx+n with nZ. (The quotient RR/Z is a covering with integer translations as deck transformations).

[F2]

Let p:EB be a covering, H:Y×IB a homotopy, and H~0:YE a lift of H(,0). There is a unique lift H~:Y×IE of H extending H~0. (Existence and uniqueness of homotopy lifts through a covering map).

[F3]

Endpoint-fixed homotopic paths in the base have lifts with the same endpoint whenever their lifts begin at the same point. (The endpoint of a lifted path depends only on its endpoint-fixed homotopy class).

Verification

technique · direct
1.1

The loop t[t] lifts from zero to the path tt, whose endpoint is one.

givenF3F1
2.1

If it had an endpoint-fixed nullhomotopy, homotopy lifting would keep the terminal lift in the discrete fibre while deforming the initial lift to the constant path at zero, forcing endpoints one and zero to agree.

step 1.1F3F2
3.1

This proves essentiality without asserting π1(R/Z)Z.

step 2.1F1
4.1

The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.

step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 59 results over 12 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources