How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The maps on are -sheeted coverings for
Example
For every integer , the map given by is a well-defined -sheeted covering.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.
For the quotient by integer translation, is a covering map, and every deck transformation is a unique translation with . (The quotient is a covering with integer translations as deck transformations).
A covering map is a continuous surjection such that every has an open neighbourhood for which is a disjoint union of open sets , called sheets, and each restriction is a homeomorphism (def-continuous-map-top, def-homeomorphism-and-open-maps, def-disjoint-union-topology). Such a is evenly covered, and is the fibre over . A covering is trivial when it is isomorphic over to a product projection with discrete. (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings).
For a covering , the cardinality of is locally constant as a function of . If is connected, all fibres are equinumerous. (The cardinality of a covering fibre is locally constant and is constant on a connected base).
On the set of pairs of natural numbers, define This is an equivalence relation (lem-int-equivalence). The integers are the quotient and we write for the equivalence class of . (The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals).
Let with . Then there exist integers and with and , and this pair is unique (Division with remainder in : for and there are unique with and ).
Verification
If with , then , so is well defined. Since and is a quotient map, is continuous. It is surjective because .
Fix and choose with . The quotient map is open, since is open for every open . Thus is open, and is a homeomorphism onto . For , put . Each is open, and is a homeomorphism onto , with inverse for . If points from and coincide, then is a multiple of for some . Since and is an integer between and , this forces and . Finally, if , then for some and ; write with by [F5], giving . Hence is the disjoint union of exactly sheets.
At the map is the identity, so no zero-sheet or division-by-zero case is hidden.
The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.
Depends on
- The quotient $\mathbb R\to\mathbb R/\mathbb Z$ is a covering with integer translations as deck transformations
- Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings
- The cardinality of a covering fibre is locally constant and is constant on a connected base
- The integers as equivalence classes of pairs of naturals
- Division with remainder in $\mathbb{Z}$: for $a \in \mathbb{Z}$ and $b > 0$ there are unique $q, r \in \mathbb{Z}$ with $a = qb + r$ and $0 \le r < b$
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
27 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Marco Gualtieri, MAT1300 Week 4 Term 2, §1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Omar Antolín Camarena, Proper local homeomorphisms and covering maps (standard reference, not scraped)