How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pulling a covering back to an evenly covered open set gives a trivial covering
Example
If is evenly covered by , then the pullback of along the inclusion is a trivial covering of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.
For a covering and a continuous map , define with the subspace topology, and let be (def-product-topology, def-subspace-topology-top). This is the pullback covering space; its covering property is proved in prop-covering-spaces-are-stable-under-restriction-finite-products-and-pullback. (The pullback of a covering space along a continuous map).
A covering map is a continuous surjection such that every has an open neighbourhood for which is a disjoint union of open sets , called sheets, and each restriction is a homeomorphism (def-continuous-map-top, def-homeomorphism-and-open-maps, def-disjoint-union-topology). Such a is evenly covered, and is the fibre over . A covering is trivial when it is isomorphic over to a product projection with discrete. (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings).
If is any space and is a nonempty discrete space, the projection is a trivial covering with fibre . If , the same holds for ; for nonempty , an empty fibre would violate surjectivity. (Trivial coverings are products with a discrete fibre).
Verification
Let be the inclusion. If , its pullback is empty and is isomorphic over to , which is a trivial covering by [F3]. Hence assume . Choose an evenly covered decomposition as in [F2]. Surjectivity of makes nonempty. The pullback is by [F1].
Give the discrete topology. Define by . Each belongs to exactly one sheet , so the inverse is for that unique . Both maps preserve the projection to .
The restriction of to each open slice is continuous because is continuous. These slices cover , so is continuous. The pullback subset is open in , since is open in ; on it, has the continuous form . These subsets cover , so is continuous. Thus is a homeomorphism over .
By [F3], is a trivial covering. The homeomorphism of step 3.1 identifies it with the pullback covering, proving the Example.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
9 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Marco Gualtieri, MAT1300 Week 4 Term 2, §1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Omar Antolín Camarena, Proper local homeomorphisms and covering maps (standard reference, not scraped)