How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Pulling a covering back to an evenly covered open set gives a trivial covering
Example
If is evenly covered by , then the pullback of along the inclusion is a trivial covering of .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The objects, hypotheses, and choice principles stated above.
For a covering and a continuous map , define with the subspace topology, and let be (def-product-topology, def-subspace-topology-top). This is the pullback covering space; its covering property is proved in prop-covering-spaces-are-stable-under-restriction-finite-products-and-pullback. (The pullback of a covering space along a continuous map).
A covering map is a continuous surjection such that every has an open neighbourhood for which is a disjoint union of open sets , called sheets, and each restriction is a homeomorphism (def-continuous-map-top, def-homeomorphism-and-open-maps, def-disjoint-union-topology). Such a is evenly covered, and is the fibre over . A covering is trivial when it is isomorphic over to a product projection with discrete. (Covering maps, evenly covered neighbourhoods, fibres, sheets, and trivial coverings).
If is any space and is a nonempty discrete space, the projection is a trivial covering with fibre . If , the same holds for ; for nonempty , an empty fibre would violate surjectivity. (Trivial coverings are products with a discrete fibre).
Verification
For the inclusion of an evenly covered open set of the base, identify the pullback with the disjoint union of the sheets over .
Write the explicit mutually inverse maps over and verify their continuity from the pullback subspace topology.
The preceding construction and implications establish the assertion.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 27 results over 11 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, §1.3 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Marco Gualtieri, MAT1300 Week 4 Term 2, §1.6 (standard reference, not scraped)
- Omar Antolín Camarena, Proper local homeomorphisms and covering maps (standard reference, not scraped)