How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
An antipodal circle map has odd lift increment and is not nullhomotopic
Statement
On , define the antipodal involution by . If a continuous map satisfies , then every lift of has
for some integer . Thus the lift increment is odd, possibly negative, and the loop is not nullhomotopic.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A continuous map with .
For the quotient map , one has exactly when , and for every integer (The circle as with basepoint ).
The quotient map is a covering map ( is a covering map with translated interval sheets).
A path in the base of a covering has a unique lift after its initial lift point is fixed (Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map).
Endpoint-fixed homotopic paths have lifts with the same endpoint whenever their lifts begin at the same point (The endpoint of a lifted path depends only on its endpoint-fixed homotopy class).
Proof
If , then , so is well defined by [F1]; moreover , so is an involution.
Suppose the loop were endpoint-fixed homotopic to the constant loop at .
Let be arbitrary subject to . By [L1] and [L2], the loop has a unique lift with . Antipodality gives , so [F1] gives a unique integer with .
For , the paths and project to the same path because , and they agree at by step 2.1. Lift uniqueness gives , so at one obtains .
The constant loop at has the constant lift beginning at , so [L3] and step 1.2 would force . Step 3.1 instead gives for every integer , including negative . This contradiction shows that the loop is not nullhomotopic and completes the odd-increment claim.
Depends on
Used by
Dependency tree · two levels
17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Allen Hatcher, Algebraic Topology, proof of Theorem 1.10 (standard reference, not scraped)