Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (deepseek-v4-pro + claude-opus-5[1m])audited 2026-08-24
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

An antipodal circle map has odd lift increment and is not nullhomotopic

Statement

On S1=R/Z, define the antipodal involution by a([u])=[u+1/2]. If a continuous map h:S1S1 satisfies ha=ah, then every lift h~:[0,1]R of th([t]) has

h~(1)h~(0)=2k+1

for some integer k. Thus the lift increment is odd, possibly negative, and the loop th([t]) is not nullhomotopic.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous map h:S1S1 with ha=ah.

[F1]

For the quotient map p:RR/Z, one has p(x)=p(y) exactly when xyZ, and p(x+m)=p(x) for every integer m (The circle as S1=R/Z with basepoint [0]).

[L1]

The quotient map p:RR/Z is a covering map (p:RR/Z is a covering map with translated interval sheets).

[L2]

A path in the base of a covering has a unique lift after its initial lift point is fixed (Existence and uniqueness of path lifts through a covering map).

[L3]

Endpoint-fixed homotopic paths have lifts with the same endpoint whenever their lifts begin at the same point (The endpoint of a lifted path depends only on its endpoint-fixed homotopy class).

Proof

technique · contradiction
1.1

If [u]=[v], then (u+1/2)(v+1/2)=uvZ, so a([u])=[u+1/2] is well defined by [F1]; moreover a(a([u]))=[u+1]=[u], so a is an involution.

F1algebra
1.2

Suppose the loop th([t]) were endpoint-fixed homotopic to the constant loop at h([0]).

assume-contra
2.1

Let yR be arbitrary subject to p(y)=h([0]). By [L1] and [L2], the loop th([t]) has a unique lift h~ with h~(0)=y. Antipodality gives p(h~(1/2))=h([1/2])=p(y+1/2), so [F1] gives a unique integer k with h~(1/2)=y+k+1/2.

step 1.1givenF1L1L2
3.1

For 0t1/2, the paths th~(t+1/2) and th~(t)+k+1/2 project to the same path because h([t+1/2])=a(h([t])), and they agree at t=0 by step 2.1. Lift uniqueness gives h~(t+1/2)=h~(t)+k+1/2, so at t=1/2 one obtains h~(1)=y+2k+1.

step 2.1F1L2algebra
4.1

The constant loop at h([0]) has the constant lift beginning at y, so [L3] and step 1.2 would force h~(1)=y. Step 3.1 instead gives h~(1)=y+2k+1y for every integer k, including negative k. This contradiction shows that the loop is not nullhomotopic and completes the odd-increment claim.

step 3.1step 1.2L3algebradischarge-contradiction

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

17 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources