How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Finite and countable subadditivity of measures
Statement
Let be a measure and let be measurable. Then
For every one also has
including , where both sides are .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A measure and a sequence of measurable sets.
A measure is countably additive on pairwise disjoint measurable sequences (Measures on sigma-algebras).
If are measurable, then (Measures are monotone).
A nonnegative extended series is the supremum of its finite partial sums, beginning with the empty sum (Series in the nonnegative extended real line).
Every nonempty subset of has a least element (The well-ordering principle).
Proof
Define . Then every is measurable, the are pairwise disjoint, and .
The unions of the two sequences agree: if , then the nonempty set has a least member , and the definition gives ; the reverse inclusion follows from .
Countable additivity, monotonicity, and the definition of a nonnegative series give .
For , apply step 2.1 to the sequence ; its union and sum are the displayed finite union and finite sum, and when they are both empty and equal to .
Depends on
Used by
- Assuming countable choice, an infinite-measure set in a semifinite measure space has arbitrarily large finite-measure subsets Lemma
- Null sets are closed under countable unions and, in a complete space, under arbitrary subsets Proposition
- Assuming countable choice, every measure is the sum of its semifinite part and a zero-infinity-valued measure Theorem
- Inclusion-exclusion for a nonempty finite family of finite-measure sets Theorem
- The first Borel-Cantelli lemma for measures Theorem
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- S. Axler, Measure, Integration & Real Analysis, Theorem 2.58 (standard reference, not scraped)