Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming countable choice, simple functions are continuous on a large closed core

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.

Let n≥1, let E⊆Rn be Lebesgue measurable with λn(E)<+∞, and let s:E→R be a simple measurable function. Then for every ε>0 there is a closed set F⊆E such that λn(E∖F)<ε and s∣F is continuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a Lebesgue measurable set E⊆Rn of finite measure, a simple measurable function s:E→R, and a real ε>0.

[L1]

If the distinct values of s are c1,…,cm and Ej:=s−1({cj}), then the sets Ej are measurable, pairwise disjoint, their union is E, and s=∑j=1mcj1Ej. (A simple function and its canonical representation)

[L2]

Assuming countable choice, every Lebesgue measurable subset of Rn has compact subsets of arbitrarily close measure from inside. (Assuming countable choice, the Lebesgue measure of a measurable set is the supremum of the measures of its compact subsets)

[L3]

For measurable (Ak) one has μ(⋃kAk)≤∑k=0∞μ(Ak). (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1L1L2choose

Let c1,…,cm be the distinct values of s, and let Ej:=s−1({cj}). By [L1], the sets Ej are measurable, pairwise disjoint, and cover E. For each j choose a compact set Kj⊆Ej with λn(Ej∖Kj)<ε/m. This is possible by [L2].

2.1step 1.1L3algebra

Put F:=⋃j=1mKj. Each Kj is closed in Rn, so the finite union F is closed and lies in E. Also E∖F=⋃j=1m(Ej∖Kj), so [L3] and step 1.1 give λn(E∖F)≤∑j=1mλn(Ej∖Kj)<ε.

3.1step 1.1step 2.1

Fix x∈F. By step 1.1, x lies in exactly one Kj. In the subspace F, the set Kj=F∖⋃i≠jKi is open because the other Ki are closed and finite in number. On that neighbourhood Kj, the restriction s∣F is constant with value cj. So s∣F is locally constant at every point of F, hence continuous.

4.1step 2.1step 3.1∎

The closed set F from step 2.1 has λn(E∖F)<ε, and step 3.1 makes s∣F continuous.

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources