Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-28
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Assuming countable choice, simple functions are continuous on a large closed core

Statement

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice.

Let n1, let ERn be Lebesgue measurable with λn(E)<+, and let s:ER be a simple measurable function. Then for every ε>0 there is a closed set FE such that λn(EF)<ε and sF is continuous.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Axiom of Countable Choice, a Lebesgue measurable set ERn of finite measure, a simple measurable function s:ER, and a real ε>0.

[L1]

If the distinct values of s are c1,,cm and Ej:=s1({cj}), then the sets Ej are measurable, pairwise disjoint, their union is E, and s=j=1mcj1Ej. (A simple function and its canonical representation)

[L2]

Assuming countable choice, every Lebesgue measurable subset of Rn has compact subsets of arbitrarily close measure from inside. (Assuming countable choice, the Lebesgue measure of a measurable set is the supremum of the measures of its compact subsets)

[L3]

For measurable (Ak) one has μ(kAk)k=0μ(Ak). (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures)

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Let c1,,cm be the distinct values of s, and let Ej:=s1({cj}). By [L1], the sets Ej are measurable, pairwise disjoint, and cover E. For each j choose a compact set KjEj with λn(EjKj)<ε/m. This is possible by [L2].

L1L2choose
2.1

Put F:=j=1mKj. Each Kj is closed in Rn, so the finite union F is closed and lies in E. Also EF=j=1m(EjKj), so [L3] and step 1.1 give λn(EF)j=1mλn(EjKj)<ε.

step 1.1L3algebra
3.1

Fix xF. By step 1.1, x lies in exactly one Kj. In the subspace F, the set Kj=FijKi is open because the other Ki are closed and finite in number. On that neighbourhood Kj, the restriction sF is constant with value cj. So sF is locally constant at every point of F, hence continuous.

step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

The closed set F from step 2.1 has λn(EF)<ε, and step 3.1 makes sF continuous.

step 2.1step 3.1

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

25 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources