How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
A nonintegrable observable with divergent ergodic averages
Statement refuted
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. A finite-valued measurable observable need not have a finite almost-everywhere ergodic-average limit when the hypothesis is omitted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice, the doubling map on , and , for .
Strict superlevel sets characterize extended-real measurability, and Borel sets are Lebesgue measurable (Extended-real-valued measurable functions, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of is Lebesgue measurable).
Nonnegative integrals are monotone and agree with simple integrals; half-open interval measure equals length (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
The harmonic series diverges and monotone convergence holds (For rational , converges iff , Monotone convergence for the integral).
Doubling is ergodic; Birkhoff gives invariant limits for integrable truncations, and invariant finite functions are constant in an ergodic probability system (Doubling is ergodic for Lebesgue measure, Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem, Equivalent invariant-set and invariant-function criteria for ergodicity).
Dominated convergence and integral invariance identify bounded average limits (Dominated convergence, Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).
Countable unions of null sets are null (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures).
Counterexample
The strict superlevel sets of are for negative levels, at level zero, and at positive level (with the ambient endpoint omitted). They are Borel, so [F1] makes the everywhere finite measurable.
On one has . Thus monotonicity and the simple-integral formula give, for every ,
The last sums are unbounded by [F3]. Hence , so is not integrable in the sense of Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals.
Put for . These are bounded integrable functions, , and [F3] yields .
For each , [F4] makes converge almost everywhere to a constant. Since the averages are bounded by , [F5] identifies that constant as .
Outside the countable union of the exceptional null sets in step 4.1, which is null by [F6], all these limits hold simultaneously. Since , there for every . Letting gives .
Thus this finite measurable but nonintegrable is the promised counterexample. Countable choice is inherited from the Lebesgue/doubling suppliers; the truncations are explicit.
Depends on
- Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem
- Doubling is ergodic for Lebesgue measure
- Equivalent invariant-set and invariant-function criteria for ergodicity
- Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps
- Monotone convergence for the integral
- Dominated convergence
- Extended-real-valued measurable functions
- Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of $\mathbb{R}^n$ is Lebesgue measurable
- Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral
- The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions
- A box in $\mathbb{R}^n$ with parameters $a_i\le b_i$ is Lebesgue measurable of measure $\prod_{i<n}(b_i-a_i)$, whichever of its faces are included
- For rational $p > 0$, $\sum 1/k^p$ converges iff $p > 1$
- Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals
- Finite and countable subadditivity of measures
- The Axiom of Countable Choice ($\mathrm{AC}_\omega$)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
85 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles Walkden, Ergodic Theory lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)