How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The binary number 0.1010... is not normal
Example
The canonical binary number
is not normal in base two: the word has frequency , not .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The periodic binary string .
The canonical convention excludes expansions eventually equal to one, and base-two normality requires each length-two word to have frequency (Canonical base-b expansions and normal numbers).
Verification
The digit-one positions are , so the represented value is
The string is not eventually one, so [F1] says it is the canonical binary expansion of .
Adjacent pairs alternate between and . Thus occurs zero times among every collection of starting positions, and its limiting frequency is .
Since base-two normality would require frequency by [F1], is not normal in base two.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
3 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles Walkden, Ergodic Theory lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)