Alphabeta Math
Pipeline-generated
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

The Ergodic Theorems of von Neumann and Birkhoff — Examples

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

These examples turn the abstract limits into orbit calculations. Irrational rotation by 2 illustrates Weyl equidistribution, the half-rotation shows exactly how a nonconstant invariant limit and its L2 projection arise, and Birkhoff converts positive visit frequency into reciprocal return-time growth. The fair-coin shift recovers the heads-frequency strong law.

The normal-number examples keep measure and cardinality separate: a simple periodic binary number is not normal, while an entire uncountable family of non-normal digit strings still has Lebesgue measure zero. Finally, the observable f(x)=1/x off zero under doubling shows that dropping L1 can force ergodic averages to diverge to infinity almost everywhere.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

None yet.

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Borel's exceptional set can be uncountable and null

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let C be the set of points in [0,1) whose canonical binary expansions have digit zero at every even position. Then C is uncountable and Lebesgue null, and no member of C is normal in base two.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and the set C just defined.

[F1]

Canonical digit strings are not eventually one, and length-q digit cylinders are half-open dyadic intervals (Canonical base-b expansions and normal numbers, Base-b digit cylinders are orbit cylinders).

[F2]

A decreasing sequence of finite-measure sets has intersection measure equal to the infimum of its measures (Continuity from above when one set has finite measure), and half-open intervals have their stated lengths (A box in Rn with parameters aibi is Lebesgue measurable of measure i<n(biai), whichever of its faces are included).

[F3]

There is no surjection from N onto its power set (Cantor's theorem: AP(A)); a nonempty set is countable exactly when it is a surjective image of N (A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of N).

[F4]

Almost every point is normal, but this theorem asserts nullity rather than countability of the exceptional set (Borel's normal number theorem).

Verification

technique · constructive
1.1

Let Cn require only digits 2,4,,2n to be zero. Prescribing the first 2n digits leaves n odd-position digits free, so [F1] writes Cn as a disjoint union of 2n half-open cylinders, each of length 22n. Consequently λ(Cn)=2n.

F1F2algebra
1.2

For AN>0, form the binary string whose digit at position 2r1 is 1 exactly when rA, and whose even-position digits are all 0. Its series xA=rA2(2r1) lies in [0,1). After any place its tail has a forced zero, so the tail value is strictly less than 1; the greedy recurrence therefore recovers exactly this string. Thus AxA maps P(N>0) into C.

F1construct
1.3

Every string in C has every even digit zero, so two adjacent digits can never both equal one. The word 11 has frequency 0, not the required 1/4; hence no member of C is normal in base two.

F1algebra
2.1

The sets Cn decrease and C=n1Cn. Since λ(C1)<, continuity from above gives λ(C)=infn2n=0.

F2step 1.1
2.2

Different subsets have different first differing odd digit, so canonical uniqueness makes the map injective. Conversely, the set of odd positions at which a point of C has digit one recovers it, so the map is a bijection onto C.

F1step 1.2
3.1

If C were countable, [F3] would give a surjection NC. Composing it with the inverse bijection in step 2.2 and the explicit shift bijection between N and N>0 would give a surjection N>0P(N>0), contradicting Cantor's theorem. Hence C is uncountable.

F3step 2.2
4.1

Steps 1.3, 2.1, and 3.1 give an uncountable null subset of the exceptional set in [F4]. Countable choice is inherited from the Lebesgue/cylinder suppliers; the family and the coding map are explicit.

F4step 2.1step 3.1step 1.3discharge-construct
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Initial terms of the square-root-two rotation

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For α=2, the fractional parts {nα} for n=0,,5 are approximately

0,0.4142,0.8284,0.2426,0.6569,0.0711.

Weyl's theorem says that the full sequence is equidistributed modulo one.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice and the positive square root 2.

[F1]

The element 2 exists and is irrational (2 exists in every complete ordered field, and is irrational).

[F2]

Every irrational rotation sequence is equidistributed modulo one (Weyl equidistribution for irrational rotations), in the half-open interval sense of Equidistribution modulo one.

[F3]

Countable choice is the standing assumption required by [F2] (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Verification

technique · direct arithmetic followed by the theorem
1.1

The inequalities obtained by squaring positive rational bounds show 1<2<3/2, 4/3<2<5/3, 5/4<2<3/2, and 7/5<2<8/5. Hence the relevant integer parts of n2 for n=0,,5 are 0,1,2,4,5,7.

F1algebra
2.1

Therefore the exact fractional parts are 0,21,222,324,425,527. Direct integer squaring gives (14142135107)2<2<(14142136107)2, so positivity places 2 between these two rational numbers; substituting the bounds into the five exact expressions and rounding to four decimal places gives the displayed list.

F1step 1.1algebra
3.1

Since 2 is irrational by [F1], [F2] applies and proves that the entire infinite sequence is equidistributed. The six computations in step 2.1 illustrate this orbit; they do not by themselves prove its asymptotic distribution. Countable choice is used only through [F2].

F1F2F3step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

A rational half-rotation has a nonconstant ergodic limit

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For T=R1/2 on the circle and f=1[0,1/4), the averages converge at every point to

g=121[0,1/4)[1/2,3/4),

a nonconstant invariant function.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, Lebesgue probability on the circle, T=R1/2, and f=1[0,1/4).

[F1]

The half-rotation preserves Lebesgue probability (Circle rotations preserve Lebesgue measure).

[F2]

The average is Anf=n1k<nfTk (Ergodic partial sums, time averages, and the invariant L2 subspace).

[F4]

Countable choice is the standing assumption required by the circle-measure and interval-measure suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Verification

technique · direct period-two calculation
1.1

Since T2 is the identity, the summands alternate between f and fT. Moreover fT=1[1/2,3/4).

givenalgebra
2.1

For n=2q, Anf=(f+fT)/2=g. For n=2q+1, the counts of the two summands differ by one, so Anfg1/n pointwise.

F2step 1.1
3.1

It follows that Anfg at every point. The half-rotation interchanges the two support intervals, so gT=g; by [F3] it takes both values 0 and 1/2 on sets of positive measure and is therefore nonconstant.

F1F3step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

Finally, [F3] gives gdλ=(1/2)(1/4+1/4)=1/4=fdλ. Thus the limit preserves the mean but need not equal the constant mean in this nonergodic example. Countable choice is used only through [F1] and [F3].

F1F3F4step 3.1algebra
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

Reciprocal return frequency from Birkhoff

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. In an ergodic probability system, let E be measurable with μ(E)>0. If τm(x) is the time of the mth visit of x to E, counting time zero as a possible visit, then

τm(x)m1μ(E)

for almost every x. This is the orbit-frequency form of Kac's reciprocal law.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full choice, an ergodic probability system (X,A,μ,T), and EA with μ(E)>0.

[F1]

Birkhoff's ergodic specialization gives An1E(x)μ(E) almost everywhere (Birkhoff ergodic theorem for ergodic finite-measure systems).

[F2]

The first-return convention uses positive return times and its Kac formula is ErEdμ=1, equivalently mean induced return time 1/μ(E) (First-return times and induced transformations, Kac return-time formula without invertibility).

[F3]

Full choice is the assumption recorded in The Axiom of Choice.

Verification

technique · invert the visit-frequency limit
1.1

Put NE(n,x)=k=0n11E(Tkx). By [F1], on a conull set NE(n,x)/nμ(E)>0. Consequently NE(n,x), so every positive visit number occurs.

F1
2.1

For such an x define canonically τm(x)=min{r0:NE(r+1,x)=m},m1. Then τm(x) and NE(τm(x)+1,x)=m.

step 1.1construct
3.1

Evaluating the limit in step 1.1 along n=τm(x)+1 gives mτm(x)+1μ(E). Positivity permits reciprocals, so (τm(x)+1)/m1/μ(E); subtracting 1/m proves τm(x)/m1/μ(E).

step 1.1step 2.1algebra
4.1

The result is orbitwise and complements [F2], which integrates the first positive return time over E. Full choice is used only through the Birkhoff specialization [F1]; the visit times in step 2.1 are least integers, not chosen from an arbitrary family.

F1F2F3step 3.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

The fair-coin strong law as a shift average

Example

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For a binary sequence x and the first-coordinate observable f(x)=x0,

Anf(x)=1nk=0n1xk.

Thus the fair-coin shift theorem is precisely the almost-sure convergence of the empirical proportion of heads to 1/2.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, binary sequence space, its left shift σ, and f(x)=x0.

[F1]

Binary cylinders prescribe finitely many coordinates (Binary-sequence cylinders and fair-coin content).

[F2]

The fair-coin frequency theorem says n1k<nxk1/2 almost surely (Fair-coin frequency strong law).

Verification

technique · direct coordinate calculation
1.1

The kth iterate of the left shift satisfies (σkx)0=xk. Therefore f(σkx)=xk.

givenalgebra
2.1

Summing step 1.1 for 0k<n and dividing by n gives Anf(x)=n1k<nxk.

step 1.1algebra
3.1

Applying [F2] to the right side proves Anf(x)1/2 almost surely. The observable is the cylinder indicator 1{x:x0=1} from [F1], so this is the usual heads-frequency strong law written dynamically. Countable choice is inherited from [F2].

F1F2step 2.1
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

The binary number 0.1010... is not normal

Example

The canonical binary number

x=0.1010102=23

is not normal in base two: the word 00 has frequency 0, not 1/4.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The periodic binary string 0.1010102.

[F1]

The canonical convention excludes expansions eventually equal to one, and base-two normality requires each length-two word to have frequency 1/4 (Canonical base-b expansions and normal numbers).

Verification

technique · direct periodic computation
1.1

The digit-one positions are 1,3,5,, so the represented value is j=02(2j+1)=1/211/4=23.

algebra
2.1

The string is not eventually one, so [F1] says it is the canonical binary expansion of 2/3.

F1step 1.1
3.1

Adjacent pairs alternate between 10 and 01. Thus 00 occurs zero times among every collection of starting positions, and its limiting frequency is 0.

step 2.1algebra
4.1

Since base-two normality would require frequency 22=1/4 by [F1], 2/3 is not normal in base two.

F1step 3.1
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-14Open item page →

A nonintegrable observable with divergent ergodic averages

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. A finite-valued measurable observable need not have a finite almost-everywhere ergodic-average limit when the L1 hypothesis is omitted.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable choice, the doubling map D2 on ([0,1),λ), and f(0)=0, f(x)=1/x for x>0.

[F1]

Strict superlevel sets characterize extended-real measurability, and Borel sets are Lebesgue measurable (Extended-real-valued measurable functions, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of Rn is Lebesgue measurable).

[F3]

The harmonic series diverges and monotone convergence holds (For rational p>0, 1/kp converges iff p>1, Monotone convergence for the integral).

[F4]

Doubling is ergodic; Birkhoff gives invariant limits for integrable truncations, and invariant finite functions are constant in an ergodic probability system (Doubling is ergodic for Lebesgue measure, Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem, Equivalent invariant-set and invariant-function criteria for ergodicity).

[F5]

Dominated convergence and integral invariance identify bounded average limits (Dominated convergence, Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).

[F6]

Countable unions of null sets are null (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures).

Counterexample

technique · constructive truncation argument
1.1

The strict superlevel sets of f are [0,1) for negative levels, (0,1) at level zero, and (0,min{1,1/a}) at positive level a (with the ambient endpoint omitted). They are Borel, so [F1] makes the everywhere finite f measurable.

F1constructalgebra
1.2

On Ik=[1/(k+1),1/k) one has fk. Thus monotonicity and the simple-integral formula give, for every N, fdλk=1Nkλ(Ik)=k=1N1k+1.

F2algebra
2.1

The last sums are unbounded by [F3]. Hence f=+, so f is not integrable in the sense of Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals.

F2F3step 1.2
3.1

Put fm=min{f,m} for m1. These are bounded integrable functions, fmf, and [F3] yields cm:=fmdλ+.

F3step 1.1step 2.1
4.1

For each m, [F4] makes Anfm converge almost everywhere to a constant. Since the averages are bounded by m, [F5] identifies that constant as cm.

F4F5step 3.1
5.1

Outside the countable union of the exceptional null sets in step 4.1, which is null by [F6], all these limits hold simultaneously. Since ffm, there lim infnAnflimnAnfm=cm for every m. Letting m gives Anf+.

F6step 3.1step 4.1
6.1

Thus this finite measurable but nonintegrable f is the promised counterexample. Countable choice is inherited from the Lebesgue/doubling suppliers; the truncations are explicit.

step 2.1step 5.1discharge-construct
ExampleConstruction: AI-generatedVerification: AI-generatedaudited 2026-09-14Open item page →

The invariant L2 projection for a half-rotation

Example

Assume the Axiom of Choice. For T=R1/2 and f=1[0,1/4), the orthogonal projection onto the invariant L2 subspace is

PMf=121[0,1/4)[1/2,3/4).

Both the pointwise and L2 ergodic averages converge to this nonconstant function.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Full choice, Lebesgue probability on the circle, T=R1/2, and f=1[0,1/4).

[F1]

The half-rotation preserves Lebesgue probability (Circle rotations preserve Lebesgue measure).

[F2]

Von Neumann's theorem says AnfPMf in complex L2 (Von Neumann mean ergodic theorem in L2).

[F3]

Birkhoff gives the pointwise almost-everywhere limit for this L1 observable (Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem).

[F4]

Full choice is the assumption recorded in The Axiom of Choice.

Verification

technique · direct period-two calculation and uniqueness of the norm limit
1.1

Since T2 is the identity, fT=1[1/2,3/4) and the summands in Anf alternate between f and fT.

givenalgebra
2.1

Put g=(f+fT)/2. For n=2q, Anf=g exactly; for n=2q+1, Anfg1/n everywhere. Therefore Anfg both pointwise and in L2, since the circle has measure one.

F1step 1.1algebra
2.2

The function g is 121[0,1/4)[1/2,3/4). The half-rotation interchanges its two support intervals, so gT=g; it is nonconstant because [F5] gives positive measure to both its support and complement.

F1F5step 1.1
3.1

By [F2], the same sequence Anf has L2 limit PMf. Uniqueness of limits in the L2 norm and step 2.1 therefore give PMf=g. Step 2.1 also strengthens the pointwise almost-everywhere conclusion of [F3] to convergence at every point in this example.

F2F3step 2.1step 2.2
4.1

Full choice is used only through the projection theorem [F2], as recorded by [F4]; the period-two computation itself is explicit.

F2F4step 3.1

Sources