How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The Ergodic Theorems of von Neumann and Birkhoff — Examples
1 · Prerequisites
- Absolute and Conditional Convergence; Rearrangement; Products
- Approximation and Compactness in C(K)
- Areas of Elementary Plane Figures
- Binary Operations, Monoids, Groups and Subgroups
- Compactness
- Compactness in Metric Spaces
- Completeness, Completion, and Uniform Continuity
- Complex Lp Spaces and Test-Function Conventions
- Construction of the Natural Numbers
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Cauchy Sequences
- Construction of the Real Numbers via Dedekind Cuts
- Continuity, IVT, EVT, and Uniform Continuity
- Cosets, Index and Lagrange's Theorem
- Countability and Uncountability
- Density Separability and Convolution in Lᵖ
- Divisibility, Euclidean Domains, Principal Ideal Domains and Unique Factorisation
- Filters and Ultrafilters
- Finite Counting, Factorials and Binomial Coefficients
- Foundations of the Real Numbers for Analysis
- Fubini and Change of Variables
- Ideals, Quotient Rings and the Isomorphism Theorems for Rings
- Lebesgue Measure on Euclidean Space
- Limits of Real Functions
- limsup, liminf, and Subsequential Limits
- Linear Independence, Bases and Dimension
- Linear Transformations, Rank-Nullity and Quotient Spaces
- Measurable Functions and Simple Approximation
- Measure Preserving Transformations and Poincare Recurrence
- Measure-Preserving Systems and Mixing Criteria
- Measures and Their Basic Properties
- Metric Spaces
- Mixed Partials, Taylor Formulae, and Extrema
- Modes of Convergence Egorov and Lusin
- Monotone Functions, Discontinuities, and Continuity Sets
- Monotone Sequences, Bolzano-Weierstrass, and Cauchy Completeness
- Normal Subgroups and Quotient Groups
- Order, Zorn's Lemma, and the Axiom of Choice
- Outer Measure and the Caratheodory Extension Theorem
- Polynomial Rings, the Division Algorithm and Roots
- Power Series and Real-Analytic Functions
- Properties of the Integral and the Working FTC
- Relations, Functions, and Quotients
- Rings, Subrings, Integral Domains and Fields
- Rⁿ as a Normed Space; Vector-Valued Functions
- Roots, Rational Powers, and Classical Inequalities
- Separation Axioms: the Hierarchy
- Sequences and Limits
- Sequences and Series of Functions; Uniform Convergence
- Series: Convergence and the Nonnegative Tests
- Sigma Algebras and Borel Sets
- Signed and Complex Measures Hahn and Jordan
- Simple Field Extensions and the Construction of the Complex Numbers
- Subspaces, Products, and Quotients
- Suprema and Infima
- The Cantor Set, Baire Category, and Measure Zero in ℝ
- The Derivative and the Mean Value Theorems
- The Ergodic Theorems of von Neumann and Birkhoff
- The Exponential Function
- The Lebesgue Integral and the Convergence Theorems
- The Logarithm and General Powers
- The Lᵖ Spaces Holder Minkowski and Riesz Fischer
- The Maximal Function and Lebesgue Differentiation
- The Radon Nikodym Theorem and Lebesgue Decomposition
- The Riemann Integral in Rᵐ and Jordan Content
- The Riemann Integral: Definition and Integrability
- The Topology of Euclidean Space
- The Total Derivative in ℝᵐ → ℝⁿ
- The ZFC Axioms and the Basic Set Constructions
- Topological Spaces and Continuity
- Topology of ℝ
- Triangularisation, Generalised Eigenspaces and Jordan Canonical Form
- Vector Spaces, Linear Subspaces, Span and Direct Sums
- Weak Mixing and the Chacon Transformation
2 · Summary
These examples turn the abstract limits into orbit calculations. Irrational rotation by illustrates Weyl equidistribution, the half-rotation shows exactly how a nonconstant invariant limit and its projection arise, and Birkhoff converts positive visit frequency into reciprocal return-time growth. The fair-coin shift recovers the heads-frequency strong law.
The normal-number examples keep measure and cardinality separate: a simple periodic binary number is not normal, while an entire uncountable family of non-normal digit strings still has Lebesgue measure zero. Finally, the observable off zero under doubling shows that dropping can force ergodic averages to diverge to infinity almost everywhere.
3 · Logical flowchart
4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs
None yet.
5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements
Borel's exceptional set can be uncountable and null
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. Let be the set of points in whose canonical binary expansions have digit zero at every even position. Then is uncountable and Lebesgue null, and no member of is normal in base two.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and the set just defined.
Canonical digit strings are not eventually one, and length- digit cylinders are half-open dyadic intervals (Canonical base-b expansions and normal numbers, Base-b digit cylinders are orbit cylinders).
A decreasing sequence of finite-measure sets has intersection measure equal to the infimum of its measures (Continuity from above when one set has finite measure), and half-open intervals have their stated lengths (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
There is no surjection from onto its power set (Cantor's theorem: ); a nonempty set is countable exactly when it is a surjective image of (A nonempty set is at most countable iff it is a surjective image of ).
Almost every point is normal, but this theorem asserts nullity rather than countability of the exceptional set (Borel's normal number theorem).
Verification
Let require only digits to be zero. Prescribing the first digits leaves odd-position digits free, so [F1] writes as a disjoint union of half-open cylinders, each of length . Consequently .
For , form the binary string whose digit at position is exactly when , and whose even-position digits are all . Its series lies in . After any place its tail has a forced zero, so the tail value is strictly less than ; the greedy recurrence therefore recovers exactly this string. Thus maps into .
Every string in has every even digit zero, so two adjacent digits can never both equal one. The word has frequency , not the required ; hence no member of is normal in base two.
The sets decrease and . Since , continuity from above gives .
Different subsets have different first differing odd digit, so canonical uniqueness makes the map injective. Conversely, the set of odd positions at which a point of has digit one recovers it, so the map is a bijection onto .
If were countable, [F3] would give a surjection . Composing it with the inverse bijection in step 2.2 and the explicit shift bijection between and would give a surjection , contradicting Cantor's theorem. Hence is uncountable.
Steps 1.3, 2.1, and 3.1 give an uncountable null subset of the exceptional set in [F4]. Countable choice is inherited from the Lebesgue/cylinder suppliers; the family and the coding map are explicit.
Initial terms of the square-root-two rotation
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For , the fractional parts for are approximately
Weyl's theorem says that the full sequence is equidistributed modulo one.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice and the positive square root .
The element exists and is irrational ( exists in every complete ordered field, and is irrational).
Every irrational rotation sequence is equidistributed modulo one (Weyl equidistribution for irrational rotations), in the half-open interval sense of Equidistribution modulo one.
Countable choice is the standing assumption required by [F2] (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Verification
The inequalities obtained by squaring positive rational bounds show , , , and . Hence the relevant integer parts of for are .
Therefore the exact fractional parts are Direct integer squaring gives so positivity places between these two rational numbers; substituting the bounds into the five exact expressions and rounding to four decimal places gives the displayed list.
Since is irrational by [F1], [F2] applies and proves that the entire infinite sequence is equidistributed. The six computations in step 2.1 illustrate this orbit; they do not by themselves prove its asymptotic distribution. Countable choice is used only through [F2].
A rational half-rotation has a nonconstant ergodic limit
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For on the circle and , the averages converge at every point to
a nonconstant invariant function.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice, Lebesgue probability on the circle, , and .
The half-rotation preserves Lebesgue probability (Circle rotations preserve Lebesgue measure).
The average is (Ergodic partial sums, time averages, and the invariant L2 subspace).
Half-open intervals have Lebesgue measure equal to their length (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
Countable choice is the standing assumption required by the circle-measure and interval-measure suppliers (The Axiom of Countable Choice ()).
Verification
Since is the identity, the summands alternate between and . Moreover .
For , . For , the counts of the two summands differ by one, so pointwise.
It follows that at every point. The half-rotation interchanges the two support intervals, so ; by [F3] it takes both values and on sets of positive measure and is therefore nonconstant.
Finally, [F3] gives . Thus the limit preserves the mean but need not equal the constant mean in this nonergodic example. Countable choice is used only through [F1] and [F3].
Reciprocal return frequency from Birkhoff
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. In an ergodic probability system, let be measurable with . If is the time of the th visit of to , counting time zero as a possible visit, then
for almost every . This is the orbit-frequency form of Kac's reciprocal law.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full choice, an ergodic probability system , and with .
Birkhoff's ergodic specialization gives almost everywhere (Birkhoff ergodic theorem for ergodic finite-measure systems).
The first-return convention uses positive return times and its Kac formula is , equivalently mean induced return time (First-return times and induced transformations, Kac return-time formula without invertibility).
Full choice is the assumption recorded in The Axiom of Choice.
Verification
Put . By [F1], on a conull set . Consequently , so every positive visit number occurs.
For such an define canonically Then and .
Evaluating the limit in step 1.1 along gives Positivity permits reciprocals, so ; subtracting proves .
The result is orbitwise and complements [F2], which integrates the first positive return time over . Full choice is used only through the Birkhoff specialization [F1]; the visit times in step 2.1 are least integers, not chosen from an arbitrary family.
The fair-coin strong law as a shift average
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For a binary sequence and the first-coordinate observable ,
Thus the fair-coin shift theorem is precisely the almost-sure convergence of the empirical proportion of heads to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice, binary sequence space, its left shift , and .
Binary cylinders prescribe finitely many coordinates (Binary-sequence cylinders and fair-coin content).
The fair-coin frequency theorem says almost surely (Fair-coin frequency strong law).
Verification
The th iterate of the left shift satisfies . Therefore .
Summing step 1.1 for and dividing by gives .
Applying [F2] to the right side proves almost surely. The observable is the cylinder indicator from [F1], so this is the usual heads-frequency strong law written dynamically. Countable choice is inherited from [F2].
The binary number 0.1010... is not normal
Example
The canonical binary number
is not normal in base two: the word has frequency , not .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The periodic binary string .
The canonical convention excludes expansions eventually equal to one, and base-two normality requires each length-two word to have frequency (Canonical base-b expansions and normal numbers).
Verification
The digit-one positions are , so the represented value is
The string is not eventually one, so [F1] says it is the canonical binary expansion of .
Adjacent pairs alternate between and . Thus occurs zero times among every collection of starting positions, and its limiting frequency is .
Since base-two normality would require frequency by [F1], is not normal in base two.
A nonintegrable observable with divergent ergodic averages
Statement refuted
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. A finite-valued measurable observable need not have a finite almost-everywhere ergodic-average limit when the hypothesis is omitted.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice, the doubling map on , and , for .
Strict superlevel sets characterize extended-real measurability, and Borel sets are Lebesgue measurable (Extended-real-valued measurable functions, Assuming countable choice, every Borel subset of is Lebesgue measurable).
Nonnegative integrals are monotone and agree with simple integrals; half-open interval measure equals length (Monotonicity and nonnegative homogeneity of the nonnegative integral, The nonnegative integral agrees with the simple integral on simple functions, A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
The harmonic series diverges and monotone convergence holds (For rational , converges iff , Monotone convergence for the integral).
Doubling is ergodic; Birkhoff gives invariant limits for integrable truncations, and invariant finite functions are constant in an ergodic probability system (Doubling is ergodic for Lebesgue measure, Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem, Equivalent invariant-set and invariant-function criteria for ergodicity).
Dominated convergence and integral invariance identify bounded average limits (Dominated convergence, Integral invariance under measure-preserving maps).
Countable unions of null sets are null (Finite and countable subadditivity of measures).
Counterexample
The strict superlevel sets of are for negative levels, at level zero, and at positive level (with the ambient endpoint omitted). They are Borel, so [F1] makes the everywhere finite measurable.
On one has . Thus monotonicity and the simple-integral formula give, for every ,
The last sums are unbounded by [F3]. Hence , so is not integrable in the sense of Integrable real and complex functions, and their integrals.
Put for . These are bounded integrable functions, , and [F3] yields .
For each , [F4] makes converge almost everywhere to a constant. Since the averages are bounded by , [F5] identifies that constant as .
Outside the countable union of the exceptional null sets in step 4.1, which is null by [F6], all these limits hold simultaneously. Since , there for every . Letting gives .
Thus this finite measurable but nonintegrable is the promised counterexample. Countable choice is inherited from the Lebesgue/doubling suppliers; the truncations are explicit.
The invariant L2 projection for a half-rotation
Example
Assume the Axiom of Choice. For and , the orthogonal projection onto the invariant subspace is
Both the pointwise and ergodic averages converge to this nonconstant function.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Full choice, Lebesgue probability on the circle, , and .
The half-rotation preserves Lebesgue probability (Circle rotations preserve Lebesgue measure).
Von Neumann's theorem says in complex (Von Neumann mean ergodic theorem in L2).
Birkhoff gives the pointwise almost-everywhere limit for this observable (Birkhoff pointwise ergodic theorem).
Full choice is the assumption recorded in The Axiom of Choice.
Half-open intervals have Lebesgue measure equal to their length (A box in with parameters is Lebesgue measurable of measure , whichever of its faces are included).
Verification
Since is the identity, and the summands in alternate between and .
Put . For , exactly; for , everywhere. Therefore both pointwise and in , since the circle has measure one.
The function is . The half-rotation interchanges its two support intervals, so ; it is nonconstant because [F5] gives positive measure to both its support and complement.
By [F2], the same sequence has limit . Uniqueness of limits in the norm and step 2.1 therefore give . Step 2.1 also strengthens the pointwise almost-everywhere conclusion of [F3] to convergence at every point in this example.
Full choice is used only through the projection theorem [F2], as recorded by [F4]; the period-two computation itself is explicit.