How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
exists in every complete ordered field, and is irrational
Example
In any complete ordered field , the element is positive, so by Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are applied to it has a unique with : this is . Moreover is not the image of any rational under the embedding , because no rational squares to . Thus every complete ordered field contains , the canonical gap that lacks, now filled by completeness.
Facts & Assumptions
Given: A complete ordered field (Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)) with unit ; write . In any ordered field , hence .
Every in has a unique with (Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are ).
There is a unique field homomorphism ; it is injective and order-preserving, and satisfies (The unique embedding of ℚ into an ordered field).
No rational number squares to (FALSE: some rational number squares to 2).
Verification
In we have , so in particular .
Apply Square roots exist: a unique with ; the positives are [L1] with : there is a unique with , and since , so ; write .
The element is not rational: if for some , then , so injectivity of [L2] forces , which is impossible by [L3]; hence lies outside .
Therefore every complete ordered field contains a unique positive with , and this is irrational: it is exactly the gap in that completeness fills.
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 29 results over 9 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (Thm 1.21, Cor) (standard reference, not scraped)
- T. Tao, Analysis I, 3rd ed., §5.5 (standard reference, not scraped)
- University of Colorado analysis notes: The real numbers (standard reference, not scraped)
- Elias Zakon, Mathematical Analysis: Irrational numbers (standard reference, not scraped)