Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-generatedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passjudge pass (openai/gpt-5.4)audited 2026-07-25
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Equivalence of the Cauchy and Dedekind constructions of R\mathbb{R}

Statement

The Cauchy-sequence reals RC\mathbb{R}_C and the Dedekind-cut reals RD\mathbb{R}_D are isomorphic as ordered fields via a unique isomorphism φ:RCRD\varphi : \mathbb{R}_C \to \mathbb{R}_D that preserves all arithmetic (++, \cdot, 00, 11, inverses) and the order (<<, hence \le, |\cdot|, and suprema), and restricts to the identity on the common rationals Q\mathbb{Q}. This is the precise sense in which the two constructions build the same R\mathbb{R}.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Cauchy-sequence reals RC\mathbb{R}_C and the Dedekind-cut reals RD\mathbb{R}_D.

[L1]

RC\mathbb{R}_C is a totally ordered field (The reals form a totally ordered field).

[L2]

RC\mathbb{R}_C has the least-upper-bound property, hence is complete (The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

[L3]

RD\mathbb{R}_D is a totally ordered field (The Dedekind reals form a totally ordered field).

[L4]

RD\mathbb{R}_D has the least-upper-bound property, hence is complete (Dedekind completeness: the least-upper-bound property, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).

[L5]

Any two complete ordered fields are isomorphic via a unique ordered-field isomorphism, which fixes Q\mathbb{Q} (Uniqueness of the complete ordered field: R\mathbb{R} up to a unique isomorphism).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

RC\mathbb{R}_C is a complete ordered field: a totally ordered field ([L1]) with the least-upper-bound property ([L2]).

L1L2
1.2

RD\mathbb{R}_D is a complete ordered field: a totally ordered field ([L3]) with the least-upper-bound property ([L4]).

L3L4
2.1

By [L5] applied to F=RCF = \mathbb{R}_C and G=RDG = \mathbb{R}_D there is a unique ordered-field isomorphism φ:RCRD\varphi : \mathbb{R}_C \to \mathbb{R}_D, and it fixes the common rationals Q\mathbb{Q}.

step 1.1step 1.2L5
3.1

As a field isomorphism φ\varphi preserves ++, \cdot, 00, 11 and inverses; as an ordered-field isomorphism it satisfies x<y    φx<φyx < y \iff \varphi x < \varphi y, hence preserves \le and |\cdot|; and it preserves suprema, in the sense that for any nonempty SRCS \subseteq \mathbb{R}_C bounded above with s=supSs = \sup S, its image φ[S]={φ(t):tS}\varphi[S] = \{\varphi(t) : t \in S\} has φ(s)=supφ[S]\varphi(s) = \sup \varphi[S], since φ(s)\varphi(s) is an upper bound of φ[S]\varphi[S] and, φ1\varphi^{-1} being order-preserving, every upper bound of φ[S]\varphi[S] is φ(s)\ge \varphi(s).

step 2.1L5
4.1

Therefore RC\mathbb{R}_C and RD\mathbb{R}_D are the same complete ordered field presented two ways, joined by the unique isomorphism φ\varphi that restricts to the identity on Q\mathbb{Q} and preserves all arithmetic and order: the Cauchy and Dedekind constructions give the same R\mathbb{R}.

step 2.1step 3.1L5

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 63 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources