How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
Equivalence of the Cauchy and Dedekind constructions of
Statement
The Cauchy-sequence reals and the Dedekind-cut reals are isomorphic as ordered fields via a unique isomorphism that preserves all arithmetic (, , , , inverses) and the order (, hence , , and suprema), and restricts to the identity on the common rationals . This is the precise sense in which the two constructions build the same .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: The Cauchy-sequence reals and the Dedekind-cut reals .
is a totally ordered field (The reals form a totally ordered field).
has the least-upper-bound property, hence is complete (The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).
is a totally ordered field (The Dedekind reals form a totally ordered field).
has the least-upper-bound property, hence is complete (Dedekind completeness: the least-upper-bound property, Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)).
Any two complete ordered fields are isomorphic via a unique ordered-field isomorphism, which fixes (Uniqueness of the complete ordered field: up to a unique isomorphism).
Proof
is a complete ordered field: a totally ordered field ([L1]) with the least-upper-bound property ([L2]).
is a complete ordered field: a totally ordered field ([L3]) with the least-upper-bound property ([L4]).
By [L5] applied to and there is a unique ordered-field isomorphism , and it fixes the common rationals .
As a field isomorphism preserves , , , and inverses; as an ordered-field isomorphism it satisfies , hence preserves and ; and it preserves suprema, in the sense that for any nonempty bounded above with , its image has , since is an upper bound of and, being order-preserving, every upper bound of is .
Therefore and are the same complete ordered field presented two ways, joined by the unique isomorphism that restricts to the identity on and preserves all arithmetic and order: the Cauchy and Dedekind constructions give the same .
Depends on
- Uniqueness of the complete ordered field: $\mathbb{R}$ up to a unique isomorphism
- The Cauchy-sequence reals have the least-upper-bound property
- The reals form a totally ordered field
- Dedekind completeness: the least-upper-bound property
- The Dedekind reals form a totally ordered field
- Complete ordered field (least-upper-bound property)
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · next 3 levels
Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 63 results over 14 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- W. Rudin, Principles of Mathematical Analysis, 3rd ed., Ch. 1 (Appendix) (standard reference, not scraped)
- M. Spivak, Calculus, 4th ed., Ch. 30 (Epilogue: uniqueness of ℝ) (standard reference, not scraped)
- E. Landau, Foundations of Analysis (standard reference, not scraped)
- Robert Lubarsky, On the Cauchy and Dedekind reals (standard reference, not scraped)
- Construction of the real numbers (Wikipedia) (standard reference, not scraped)