How statement and proof provenance work
The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.
- Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
- AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
- AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.
These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.
The fair-coin strong law as a shift average
Example
Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice. For a binary sequence and the first-coordinate observable ,
Thus the fair-coin shift theorem is precisely the almost-sure convergence of the empirical proportion of heads to .
Facts & Assumptions
Given: Countable choice, binary sequence space, its left shift , and .
Binary cylinders prescribe finitely many coordinates (Binary-sequence cylinders and fair-coin content).
The fair-coin frequency theorem says almost surely (Fair-coin frequency strong law).
Verification
The th iterate of the left shift satisfies . Therefore .
Summing step 1.1 for and dividing by gives .
Applying [F2] to the right side proves almost surely. The observable is the cylinder indicator from [F1], so this is the usual heads-frequency strong law written dynamically. Countable choice is inherited from [F2].
Depends on
Used by
Nothing in the library uses this result yet.
Dependency tree · two levels
16 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.
Sources
- Charles Walkden, Ergodic Theory lecture notes (standard reference, not scraped)