Alphabeta Math
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

✓ 22 results · all verified · 0 also independently AI-judged
Every result on this page is machine-checked by a proof checker and read in full and owner-audited; the judge is an additional, independent cross-model AI review of the proofs. The 22 not AI-judged were verified by owner audit (typically over a confirmed judge false positive), not failures.

Fubini and Change of Variables

1 · Prerequisites

2 · Summary

Multidimensional Darboux integration and Jordan content provide rectangles, grids, null boundaries, and integration over Jordan sets. Euclidean differentiation supplies C1 maps, Jacobian matrices, inverse functions, and derivative estimates; row reduction and determinants supply the algebraic volume factor. Together these declared prerequisites support finite section arguments and local linearization without measure theory.

Lower and upper section integrals lead to rectangular and Jordan-set Fubini theorems, repeated integration, Cavalieri's principle, and graph-bounded regions. Determinants then control linear images and parallelepipeds. Near-identity cube estimates yield local volume distortion and preservation of compact Jordan sets, culminating in change of variables for compact Jordan sets, compactly supported functions, and bounded open Jordan sets, with the one-dimensional absolute-derivative formula reconciled with oriented substitution.

3 · Logical flowchart

4 · Definitions, theorems and proofs

DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Sections, lower and upper section integrals, and iterated Riemann integrals on product rectangles and Jordan sets

Definition

Let p,q≥1, let A⊆Rp and B⊆Rq be nondegenerate closed rectangles, and let f:A×B→R be bounded. For x∈A and y∈B, the sections of f are fx:B→R,fx(y):=f(x,y),fy:A→R,fy(x):=f(x,y). Their lower and upper section integrals are the everywhere-defined bounded functions ℓB(x):=∫B‾fx,uB(x):=∫B‾fx,ℓA(y):=∫A‾fy,uA(y):=∫A‾fy, using The lower and upper Darboux integrals over a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm. They are defined even when the corresponding section is not Riemann integrable, and always satisfy ℓB≤uB and ℓA≤uA.

If every fx is integrable and the function x↦∫Bfx is integrable on A, define the ordinary iterated integral in the B-then-A order by ∫A(∫Bf(x,y) dy)dx:=∫A(x↦∫Bfx). The other order is defined symmetrically. More generally, if the sections are integrable outside a content-zero set N⊆A, any bounded function h:A→R satisfying h(x)=∫Bfx for x∉N is an exceptionally completed section-integral function. Its integral, when it exists, is independent of its values on N.

Let now E⊆Rp+q be a bounded Jordan set and g:E→R be bounded. Its section at x∈Rp is Ex:={y∈Rq:(x,y)∈E},gx:Ex→R,gx(y):=g(x,y). Empty sections have integral 0. For a nonempty Jordan section, ∫Exgx means the Jordan-set integral of The Riemann integral of a bounded function over a bounded Jordan measurable set. Section integrals over a Jordan set and their iterated integrals are defined by first choosing factor rectangles with E⊆A×B and applying the preceding conventions to the zero extension of g. Independence of those rectangles is proved in Fubini over a bounded Jordan set when all but a content-zero family of sections are integrable.

LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A product grid bounds the Darboux sums of the lower and upper section-integral functions

Statement

Let A⊆Rp and B⊆Rq be nondegenerate closed rectangles, let f:A×B→R be bounded, and let P and R be grids of A and B. With ℓB,uB:A→R the lower and upper B-section-integral functions of Sections, lower and upper section integrals, and iterated Riemann integrals on product rectangles and Jordan sets, L(f,P×R)≤L(ℓB,P)≤U(ℓB,P)≤U(uB,P)≤U(f,P×R). The symmetric chain holds after exchanging A and B. No individual section is assumed integrable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Rectangles A,B, a bounded f:A×B→R, grids P,R, and the section envelopes ℓB,uB.

[L1]

For a bounded function on a product rectangle, the lower and upper section integrals are defined for every parameter even when the section is not Riemann integrable (Sections, lower and upper section integrals, and iterated Riemann integrals on product rectangles and Jordan sets).

[L2]

A grid cell of a product rectangle is the product of the corresponding cells of the two factor grids, and a sum over cells is the associated finite iterated sum (Grid partitions of a rectangle in Rm, their cells, refinements and mesh).

[L3]

Lower and upper Darboux sums are the finite sums of the cell infima and suprema weighted by cell volume (Lower and upper Darboux sums over a grid partition in Rm); finite sums may be regrouped and preserve inequalities term by term (Laws of finite sums and finite products).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For a cell I of P and a cell J of R, put mIJ:=inf⁡I×Jf and MIJ:=sup⁡I×Jf. Regrouping the finite sums over the product grid gives L(f,P×R)=∑Ivol⁡(I)∑JmIJvol⁡(J) and the analogous formula with MIJ for the upper sum.

L2L3given
2.1

If x∈I, then inf⁡Jfx≥mIJ and sup⁡Jfx≤MIJ for every J. Hence ℓB(x)≥∑JmIJvol⁡(J) and uB(x)≤∑JMIJvol⁡(J). Taking the infimum or supremum over x∈I preserves these inequalities.

L1L3step 1.1algebra
3.1

Multiply the cellwise inequalities by vol⁡(I) and sum over I. Together with ℓB≤uB, this gives the displayed chain. Exchanging the coordinate blocks gives the symmetric chain.

L1L3step 2.1algebra∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections

Statement

Let A⊆Rp and B⊆Rq be nondegenerate closed rectangles, and let f:A×B→R be Riemann integrable. Then the four lower and upper section-integral functions of Sections, lower and upper section integrals, and iterated Riemann integrals on product rectangles and Jordan sets are Riemann integrable and ∫AℓB=∫AuB=∫A×Bf=∫BℓA=∫BuA.

If the B-sections are integrable outside a content-zero set N⊆A, every bounded exceptionally completed function h with h(x)=∫Bfx for x∉N is integrable and ∫A×Bf=∫Ah. The same assertion holds with the coordinate blocks exchanged. In particular, when every section in an order is integrable, the ordinary iterated integral in that order exists and equals the multiple integral. The theorem does not assert that every section of an integrable function is integrable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Nondegenerate rectangles A,B and a Riemann-integrable f:A×B→R.

[L1]

Product-grid Darboux sums bound the outer Darboux sums of the lower and upper section-integral functions (A product grid bounds the Darboux sums of the lower and upper section-integral functions).

[L2]

A bounded f:Q→R on a nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable if and only if, for every ε>0, some grid P satisfies U(f,P)−L(f,P)<ε (Riemann's criterion on a nondegenerate rectangle in Rm: integrability is equivalent to arbitrarily small Darboux gaps).

[L3]

A content-zero set has finite cube covers of arbitrarily small total volume (Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers).

[L4]

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Given ε>0, [L2] supplies a grid of A×B with Darboux gap below ε. Its coordinate grids form a product grid, and [L1] places the lower and upper Darboux gaps of both ℓB and uB inside that same gap.

L1L2given
2.1

By [L2], both ℓB and uB are integrable. The inequalities in [L1], applied to grids with gaps tending to zero, give ∫AℓB≥∫A×Bf and ∫AuB≤∫A×Bf; since ℓB≤uB, all three values are equal. The same argument after exchanging A and B gives the other two equalities.

L2step 1.1algebra
3.1

Suppose h=∫Bfx outside a content-zero N. There h=ℓB=uB. If M bounds ∣h∣,∣ℓB∣,∣uB∣, a finite cube cover of N with arbitrarily small total volume, refined into an outer grid, bounds the upper integral of ∣h−ℓB∣ by 2M times that volume. The criterion [L2] therefore makes h−ℓB integrable with integral 0, and linearity gives ∫Ah=∫AℓB=∫A×Bf. The exchanged assertion is identical.

L2L3L4step 2.1algebra∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A continuous function on a closed rectangle has repeated Riemann integrals in every coordinate order, all equal to its multiple integral

Statement

Let Q=∏j<n[aj,bj]⊆Rn, where n≥1 and every aj<bj. If f:Q→R is continuous, then for every permutation of the coordinates the corresponding repeated Riemann integral exists and equals ∫Qf.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A continuous real function f on a nondegenerate closed rectangle Q⊆Rn.

[L1]

Riemann--Fubini identifies the multiple integral with either iterated integral whenever the ordinary sections exist away from a content-zero exceptional set (Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections).

[L2]

Every continuous real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in positive dimension is Riemann integrable (Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable).

[L3]

A continuous map from a compact metric space to a metric space is uniformly continuous (Heine-Cantor: a continuous map from a compact metric space to any metric space is uniformly continuous).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Every coordinate section is continuous, hence integrable by [L2]. Moreover f is uniformly continuous on the compact rectangle by [L3]; therefore integrating in one coordinate produces a continuous function of the remaining coordinates, since the difference of two section integrals is bounded by the interval length times the uniform oscillation of f.

L2L3given
2.1

Apply [L1] to the first coordinate in a prescribed order. Step 1.1 makes the resulting function continuous, so the same argument applies to the next coordinate. Induction through the finite coordinate list gives the repeated integral.

L1step 1.1
3.1

For n=1 the repeated integral is the original integral. At every later stage [L1] preserves its value, so every coordinate order gives ∫Qf.

step 2.1algebra∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The integral of a product function on a product rectangle is the product of the two integrals

Statement

Let A⊆Rp and B⊆Rq be nondegenerate closed rectangles. If a:A→R and b:B→R are continuous and f(x,y):=a(x)b(y), then ∫A×Bf=(∫Aa)(∫Bb). In particular, if f(x,y)=a(x) is independent of y, then ∫A×Bf=vol⁡(B)∫Aa.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Nondegenerate rectangles A,B, continuous functions a,b, and f(x,y)=a(x)b(y).

[L1]

Riemann--Fubini identifies the integral over a product rectangle with either iterated integral (Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections).

[L2]

A continuous real function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle is Riemann integrable (Every continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm is Riemann integrable).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The product f is continuous and hence integrable by [L2]. For fixed x, linearity [L3] gives ∫Bfx=a(x)∫Bb.

L2L3given
2.1

Apply [L1] and [L3] once more: ∫A×Bf=∫A(a(x)∫Bb)=(∫Aa)(∫Bb).

L1L3step 1.1
3.1

Taking b constantly equal to 1 gives ∫Bb=vol⁡(B) and yields the coordinate-independent case, including the case ∫Aa=0.

step 2.1algebra∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

An integrable function whose sections vanish outside finite sets has multiple integral zero

Statement

Let A⊆Rp and B⊆Rq be nondegenerate closed rectangles, and let f:A×B→R be Riemann integrable. If the set S:={x∈A:fx is not identically 0} is finite, then ∫A×Bf=0. The analogous assertion holds with the coordinate blocks exchanged.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: An integrable f:A×B→R whose nonzero B-sections are indexed by a finite set S.

[L1]

Riemann--Fubini permits a content-zero exceptional set of parameters and identifies the multiple integral with the resulting iterated integral (Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections).

[L2]

A set has content zero when it admits finite cube covers of arbitrarily small total volume (Measure zero and content zero in Rm by countable and finite cube covers).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

A finite subset of Rp has content zero by [L2]: for a given ε>0, cover its finitely many points by cubes whose total volume is below ε.

L2given
2.1

Outside S every section is identically zero and has integral zero. Complete the section-integral function by the value 0 on S and apply [L1]; the resulting outer function is identically zero, so the multiple integral is zero.

L1step 1.1
3.1

If S is empty then f itself is identically zero, and step 2.1 still applies. Exchanging the coordinate blocks proves the symmetric assertion.

step 2.1algebra∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Fubini over a bounded Jordan set when all but a content-zero family of sections are integrable

Statement

Let E⊆Rp+q be a bounded Jordan set and let g:E→R be Riemann integrable. Suppose that for all x outside a content-zero set N⊆Rp, the section Ex is Jordan measurable and gx is integrable over it. Put h(x)=∫Exgx there and assign arbitrary bounded values to h on N, with empty-section integral equal to 0. Then h is integrable on any rectangle containing the projection of E, its integral is independent of that rectangle and of the values on N, and ∫Eg=∫h(x) dx. The symmetric assertion holds for the other coordinate block.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A bounded Jordan set E, an integrable g:E→R, and the stated content-zero exceptional family of sections.

[L1]

Riemann--Fubini applies to bounded functions on a product rectangle using lower and upper section integrals and a content-zero exceptional set (Riemann--Fubini on product rectangles, with lower and upper section integrals and content-zero exceptional sections).

[L2]

An empty Jordan section has integral zero, and section integrals are taken after zero extension to a bounding rectangle (Sections, lower and upper section integrals, and iterated Riemann integrals on product rectangles and Jordan sets).

[L3]

The Jordan-set integral is independent of the chosen bounding rectangle (The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Choose nondegenerate rectangles A⊆Rp and B⊆Rq with E⊆A×B, and extend g by zero to A×B. For every x, the resulting section is the zero extension to B of gx, and it is identically zero when Ex is empty.

L2given
2.1

The zero extension is integrable by the definition of the Jordan-set integral. Apply [L1]; outside N its ordinary section integral is exactly h(x), so the exceptional-section clause gives ∫Eg=∫Ah.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Enlarging A or B only adds zero to the zero extension. Independence of the Jordan integral from a bounding rectangle [L3] and the content-zero invariance in [L1] therefore prove independence of both factor rectangles and of the assigned values on N.

L1L2L3step 2.1algebra∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Cavalieri: Jordan content is the integral of sectional contents, and equal sections give equal content

Statement

Let E⊆Rp+q be a bounded Jordan set whose sections Ex are Jordan measurable outside a content-zero set of parameters. Then the completed sectional-content function x↦cont⁡(Ex) is integrable and cont⁡(E)=∫cont⁡(Ex) dx, with empty sections assigned content 0.

Consequently, if bounded Jordan sets E,F⊆Rp+q have Jordan sections outside content-zero exceptional parameter sets and cont⁡(Ex)=cont⁡(Fx) wherever both are ordinary Jordan sections outside those sets, then cont⁡(E)=cont⁡(F).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Bounded Jordan sets with the stated sectional hypotheses.

[L1]

Jordan--Fubini computes an integral over a bounded Jordan set by integrating its section integrals, with empty sections assigned zero (Fubini over a bounded Jordan set when all but a content-zero family of sections are integrable).

[L2]

A metric-bounded set is Jordan measurable if and only if its indicator is Riemann integrable on a bounding rectangle, and then the indicator integral is its Jordan content (A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Apply [L1] to the constant-one function on E. Its integral over E is cont⁡(E) by [L2], while the integral over a section is cont⁡(Ex), again by [L2].

L1L2given
2.1

For E and F, the two completed sectional-content functions agree outside the union of their exceptional sets, which is content zero. Their integrals are therefore equal, and step 1.1 identifies those integrals with the two total contents.

L1step 1.1
3.1

Empty sections contribute 0. If either set has content zero, the same formula gives zero on both sides, so no nonemptiness hypothesis is hidden.

step 1.1algebra∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A region between two continuous graphs is Jordan measurable, and a continuous integrand extending to its closure integrates by vertical sections

Statement

Let a<b, let α,β:[a,b]→R be continuous with α≤β, and put K:={(x,y):a≤x≤b, α(x)≤y≤β(x)}. Then K is compact and Jordan measurable. If a function on the open region between the graphs extends to a continuous H:K→R, then H is Riemann integrable over K and ∫KH=∫ab(∫α(x)β(x)H(x,y) dy)dx. The formula includes coincident graphs and uses the continuous extension on the boundary.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Continuous α≤β on [a,b], the closed region K, and a continuous H:K→R.

[L1]

Jordan--Fubini integrates a bounded integrable function over a Jordan set by its Jordan sections (Fubini over a bounded Jordan set when all but a content-zero family of sections are integrable).

[L2]

A metric-bounded set is Jordan measurable if and only if its boundary is null, equivalently content zero (A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero).

[L3]

The graph of a continuous real function on a compact Jordan domain has content zero (The graph of a continuous function on a closed nondegenerate rectangle in Rm has content zero in Rm+1).

[L4]

A continuous real function on a compact Jordan set is Riemann integrable there (A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The boundary of K is contained in the graphs of α and β together with the two vertical endpoint segments. Each is a continuous graph, after exchanging coordinates for the vertical segments, and hence has content zero by [L3]. The set K is closed and bounded, hence compact by [L5], and [L2] makes it Jordan measurable.

L2L3L5given
2.1

The continuous H is integrable on the compact Jordan set by [L4]. Every vertical section is the closed interval [α(x),β(x)], and its restriction is continuous, so [L1] gives the displayed formula.

L1L4step 1.1
3.1

If α(x)=β(x), that section is degenerate and contributes 0; the endpoint sections and all other boundary changes have content zero. Requiring a continuous extension to K supplies boundedness and integrability that continuity only on the open region would not supply.

step 2.1algebra∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The Jacobian determinant of a square-dimensional C1 map is the determinant of its Jacobian matrix

Definition

Let n≥1, let U⊆Rn be open, and let g=(g1,…,gn):U→Rn be C1. Its Jacobian matrix at x∈U is Dg(x)=(∂gi∂xj(x))1≤i,j≤n, the matrix of the total derivative in the standard bases. Its Jacobian determinant is det⁡Dg(x). The change-of-variables scale factor is ∣det⁡Dg(x)∣. Thus an orientation-reversing derivative and an orientation-preserving derivative with the same volume scale have the same change-of-variables factor.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Finite Jordan covers bound upper integrals, while interior-disjoint Jordan subfamilies bound lower integrals

Statement

Let n≥1, let E⊆Rn be a bounded Jordan set, and let h:E→[0,∞) be bounded and Riemann integrable.

  1. If Jordan sets E1,…,EN cover E, and each Mi≥0 satisfies Mi≥sup⁡E∩Eih whenever that intersection is nonempty, then ∫Eh≤∑i=1NMicont⁡(Ei).
  2. If Jordan sets F1,…,FN lie in E and have pairwise disjoint interiors, and each real mi satisfies mi≤inf⁡Fih whenever Fi is nonempty, then ∑i=1Nmicont⁡(Fi)≤∫Eh.

For an arbitrary bounded integrable real h and a nonempty Jordan set F⊆E, ∣∫Fh∣≤sup⁡F∣h∣cont⁡(F).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Jordan sets and bounded integrable function in the statement.

[L1]

On a bounding rectangle, the Riemann integral is linear, monotone, and bounded by the integral of the absolute value (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm); zero extension transfers these properties to Jordan-set integrals.

[L2]

The indicator of a bounded Jordan set is Riemann integrable with integral equal to its content (A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content), and a bounded set is Jordan measurable exactly when its boundary has content zero (A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Extend all functions by zero to one bounding rectangle. The indicators in [L2] are integrable, and the nonnegativity of every Mi makes the following inequality valid both on and off E. Monotonicity and finite linearity from [L1] give the cover bound, because each indicator integral is the content of its Jordan set: h≤∑i=1NMi1Ei.

L1L2given
1.2

The restriction of h to each Fi is integrable: away from grid cells meeting ∂Fi its Darboux gap is inherited from h, while [L2] makes the total volume of boundary cells arbitrarily small. Hence ∫Fih≥micont⁡(Fi) by [L1]. Pairwise interior-disjoint Jordan sets intersect only on their content-zero boundaries, so the sum of their zero-extended restrictions equals the restriction to their union outside a content-zero set. The same boundary-cell argument and linearity [L1] therefore add these integrals without overcounting; their union lies in E, and h≥0, giving the lower bound.

L1L2
2.1

The boundary-cell argument in step 1.2 also makes the restriction of a signed integrable h to F integrable. A nonempty F makes sup⁡F∣h∣ a real number, since h is bounded. On F, the inequalities −∣h∣≤h≤∣h∣≤sup⁡F∣h∣ and [L1], together with the indicator identity in [L2], give the last estimate.

L1L2step 1.2∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A linear endomorphism of Rn sends bounded Jordan sets to bounded Jordan sets and scales their content by the absolute determinant

Statement

Let n≥1 and let T:Rn→Rn be linear, with standard matrix A. For every bounded Jordan set E, the image T(E) is a bounded Jordan set and cont⁡(T(E))=∣det⁡A∣cont⁡(E). In particular, a singular linear image has content zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A linear endomorphism T with matrix A and a bounded Jordan set E.

[L1]

For every n≥1 and A∈Mn(R), the matrix A is invertible if and only if det⁡(A)≠0 (A finite square real matrix is invertible if and only if its determinant is nonzero); every invertible A∈Mn(R) is a finite product of elementary matrices, with the identity represented by the empty product (Every invertible finite square real matrix is a finite product of elementary matrices).

[L2]

For n≥1 and A∈Mn(R) over a commutative ring, interchanging two rows changes det⁡(A) to −det⁡(A), multiplying one row by c∈R changes it to cdet⁡(A), and adding c times one row to a distinct row leaves it equal to det⁡(A) (For every square matrix, including singular ones, a row swap negates the determinant, scaling a row by any scalar scales it, and row addition leaves it unchanged).

[L3]

Cavalieri identifies content with the integral of sectional contents (Cavalieri: Jordan content is the integral of sectional contents, and equal sections give equal content).

[L4]

Lipschitz self-maps of Euclidean space preserve null sets (A Lipschitz map Rm→Rm sends null sets to null sets), and a bounded set is Jordan measurable exactly when its boundary is null (A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero).

[L6]

Every finite matrix over a field is row equivalent, by Gaussian elimination, to a matrix in row echelon form (Gaussian elimination reduces every finite matrix over a field to row echelon form). For A∈Mn(F), the matrix A is invertible if and only if it has a pivot in every row and every column (Invertible matrix theorem: invertibility, full pivot rank, RREF I, trivial nullspace and unique solvability are equivalent).

[L7]

If r elementary row operations transform A into B, and E1,…,Er are their elementary matrices in execution order, then B=Er⋯E1A; for r=0 the empty product is the identity and B=A (A finite row reduction from A to B is encoded by B=Er⋯E1A). Every elementary matrix E∈Mn(F) is invertible, with inverse the elementary matrix of the inverse row operation (Every elementary matrix is invertible, with inverse given by the reverse elementary operation).

[L8]

Jordan inner and outer content approximate a Jordan set by finite rectangular figures (Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm).

Proof

technique · constructive
1.1

Suppose first that A is invertible. For every elementary matrix E0, both E0 and E0−1 are Lipschitz by [L5], so ∂(E0F)=E0(∂F) for every bounded set F. Thus [L4] makes E0F Jordan whenever F is Jordan. Coordinate permutations and nonzero coordinate scalings send rectangular figures to rectangular figures, with content factor 1 and ∣c∣ respectively; applying this to arbitrarily close inner and outer figures from [L8] proves those factors for every bounded Jordan F. For a shear adding c times one coordinate to another, take rectangular figures P⊆F⊆Q from [L8] with cont⁡(Q)−cont⁡(P) arbitrarily small. Sections of a rectangular figure parallel to the changed coordinate are finite unions of intervals, hence Jordan at every parameter, and the corresponding sections of E0P and E0Q are their translates by a quantity depending only on the fixed coordinates, so they are finite unions of intervals of the same total length. Both hypotheses of [L3] are therefore met by P,Q,E0P,E0Q but are not claimed for F, whose sections need not be Jordan; [L3] gives cont⁡(E0P)=cont⁡(P) and cont⁡(E0Q)=cont⁡(Q). Since E0P⊆E0F⊆E0Q and E0F is already known Jordan, its content and that of F are both squeezed between cont⁡(P) and cont⁡(Q), so a shear preserves content. These are exactly the absolute determinant factors listed by [L2].

L2L3L4L5L8construct
2.1

By [L1], write A as a finite product of elementary matrices. Apply step 1.1 successively to E: every intermediate image is bounded Jordan, and its content is multiplied by the corresponding absolute determinant factor. The row-operation laws [L2], applied successively from the identity, identify the product of those factors with ∣det⁡A∣. Boundedness follows from [L5].

L1L2L5step 1.1
3.1

If A is singular, [L6] reduces it to an echelon matrix with a zero row; [L7] realizes this as an invertible change of codomain coordinates. The transformed range lies in a coordinate hyperplane, whose bounded part fits in slabs of arbitrarily small thickness and therefore has content zero and is Jordan. Applying the invertible case to undo the coordinate change shows that T(E) has content zero and is Jordan; the real criterion in [L1] gives det⁡A=0, so the same formula holds.

L1L6L7step 2.1discharge-construct: invertible and singular constructions∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The Jordan content of the parallelepiped spanned by the columns of a square real matrix is the absolute value of its determinant

Statement

Let n≥1. For column vectors v1,…,vn∈Rn, let A=[v1 ⋯ vn] and P(v1,…,vn):={∑j=1ntjvj:0≤tj≤1}. Then P(v1,…,vn) is Jordan measurable and cont⁡(P(v1,…,vn))=∣det⁡A∣. This includes the singular case, when the content is zero.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The spanning vectors, their column matrix A, and the unit cube Q=[0,1]n.

[L1]

A linear map scales the content of every bounded Jordan set by the absolute determinant of its matrix (A linear endomorphism of Rn sends bounded Jordan sets to bounded Jordan sets and scales their content by the absolute determinant).

[L2]

The unit cube is a rectangle of volume 1 (Axis-parallel rectangles in Rm and their volume).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

The matrix map T(x)=Ax sends Q exactly onto P(v1,…,vn).

L1given
2.1

Apply [L1] to Q and use [L2] to obtain the stated content formula: cont⁡(P)=∣det⁡A∣cont⁡(Q)=∣det⁡A∣. If the columns are dependent, [L1] simultaneously supplies Jordan measurability and the zero-content conclusion.

L1L2step 1.1∎
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A C1 map uniformly close to the identity derivative sandwiches a cube between contracted and expanded cubes

Statement

Let n≥1, let C(a,r)={x:∥x−a∥∞≤r} with r>0, let W⊆Rn be convex and open with C(a,r)⊆W, and let F:W→Rn be C1. Assume F(a)=a and, for some 0≤q<1, ∥(DF(z)−I)v∥2≤qn∥v∥2 for every z∈W and v∈Rn. Then C(a,(1−q)r)⊆F(C(a,r))⊆C(a,(1+q)r). Moreover, F is injective on C(a,r).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The cube, the C1 map, and the strict derivative error bound in the statement.

[L4]

The Euclidean and sup norms satisfy ∥w∥∞≤∥w∥2≤n∥w∥∞ (Each ∥⋅∥p is a norm on Rn, and the induced metrics are exactly d1, d2 and d∞ of the published metric-spaces page).

Proof

technique · fixed-point
1.1

Put R=F−I and use [L1] with the Euclidean--sup norm comparison [L4] to obtain the contraction estimate ∥R(x)−R(y)∥∞≤q∥x−y∥∞ on the cube. In particular ∥R(x)∥∞≤qr, so F(x)=x+R(x) lies in C(a,(1+q)r).

L1L4given
2.1

Fix z∈C(a,(1−q)r) and define Sz(x)=z−R(x). Step 1.1 gives Sz(C(a,r))⊆C(a,r) and makes Sz a q-contraction. The cube is a nonempty closed subset of complete Euclidean space, so [L2]--[L3] give x∈C(a,r) with Sz(x)=x, equivalently F(x)=z. This proves the inner containment.

L2L3step 1.1
3.1

If F(x)=F(y), then x−y=R(y)−R(x), so step 1.1 gives ∥x−y∥∞≤q∥x−y∥∞. Since q<1, x=y. The assumptions r>0 and q<1 are essential to the nondegenerate fixed-point argument.

step 1.1algebra∎
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

On a small cube, a C1 diffeomorphism distorts Jordan content by factors arbitrarily close to its linearized absolute determinant

Statement

Let n≥1, let g:U→Rn be C1 on an open set, let a∈U, and suppose A=Dg(a) is invertible. For every 0<ε<1 there is a closed cube Q centred at a, of positive radius and contained in U, such that every Jordan set E⊆Q has Jordan image and ∣det⁡Dg(a)∣(1−ε)ncont⁡(E)≤cont⁡(g(E))≤∣det⁡Dg(a)∣(1+ε)ncont⁡(E). The cube may be chosen inside any prescribed neighborhood of a.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The C1 map, the point a, invertible A=Dg(a), and 0<ε<1.

[L1]

A linear endomorphism maps Jordan sets to Jordan sets and scales content by its absolute determinant (A linear endomorphism of Rn sends bounded Jordan sets to bounded Jordan sets and scales their content by the absolute determinant).

[L2]

A map whose derivative is uniformly close enough to the identity sandwiches each sufficiently small cube between concentric contracted and expanded cubes (A C1 map uniformly close to the identity derivative sandwiches a cube between contracted and expanded cubes).

[L3]

Jordan inner and outer content approximate Jordan sets by finite rectangular figures (Jordan inner and outer content and Jordan measurable bounded sets in Rm).

[L4]
[L5]

Jordan content is finitely additive across Jordan pieces whose overlaps have content zero (Jordan content is finitely additive when the overlap has content zero).

Proof

technique · reduction
1.1

Normalize at a by the affine map H(x)=a+A−1(g(x)−g(a)). Choose 0<q<ε and a slightly larger cube inside U on which ∥DH−I∥2→2≤q/n. The mean-value bound in [L4] makes H−I a q-contraction in the sup norm, so H is injective and bi-Lipschitz there. The derivative bound also makes every DH invertible; the inverse function theorem in [L4] therefore makes H a homeomorphism on a neighborhood of the smaller positive-radius cube Q. Here H(a)=a and DH(a)=I; continuity of Dg permits the stated choice inside any prescribed neighborhood.

L4given
2.1

If E⊆Q is Jordan, the homeomorphism in step 1.1 gives ∂H(E)=H(∂E). Compose H on the larger cube with coordinatewise clamping onto that cube to obtain a global Lipschitz map. Since ∂E is null, [L4] makes H(∂E) null and hence makes H(E) Jordan.

L4step 1.1
3.1

Refine inner and outer figures from [L3] into finite unions of sufficiently small, interior-disjoint cubes P⊆E⊆R with arbitrarily small content gap. After translating at each cube centre, [L2] sandwiches its H-image between cubes with factors (1−q)n and (1+q)n. Step 2.1 makes those images Jordan, injectivity makes their interiors disjoint, and [L5] adds their contents. Letting the figure gap vanish gives the stronger bounds with q; since q<ε, these imply the displayed bounds for H(E). Finally g(E)=g(a)+A(H(E)−a), so [L1] multiplies every content by ∣det⁡A∣=∣det⁡Dg(a)∣.

L1L2L3L5step 1.1step 2.1∎
TheoremStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

An injective C1 map with invertible derivative sends compact Jordan sets to compact Jordan sets

Statement

Let n≥1, let U⊆Rn be open, let g:U→Rn be injective and C1, and suppose Dg(x) is invertible for every x∈U. If K⊆U is compact and Jordan measurable, then g(K) is compact and Jordan measurable.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The open set U, injective C1 map g, and compact Jordan set K⊆U.

[L1]

The Euclidean inverse function theorem makes g a local C1 diffeomorphism wherever its derivative is invertible (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

[L3]

Lipschitz self-maps of Euclidean space preserve null sets (A Lipschitz map Rm→Rm sends null sets to null sets), and a bounded set is Jordan measurable exactly when its boundary is null (A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero).

Proof

technique · local-to-global
1.1

Continuity and [L2] make g(K) compact, hence closed and bounded. If y=g(x)∈∂g(K), then x cannot lie in the interior of K: otherwise [L1], together with global injectivity on U, would map a neighborhood of x contained in K onto a neighborhood of y contained in g(K). Thus ∂g(K)⊆g(∂K).

L1L2
1.2

Around each point of the compact set ∂K, choose a closed cube in a slightly larger convex cube inside U on which Dg is bounded. By [L4], g is Lipschitz on the smaller cube. Composing its restriction with coordinatewise clamping onto that cube produces a Lipschitz self-map of Rn, so [L3] sends the null set ∂K inside the cube to a null set. A finite subcover shows that g(∂K) is null.

L3L4given
2.1

Step 1.1 makes ∂g(K) a subset of the null set from step 1.2. Since g(K) is bounded, the boundary criterion in [L3] proves it is Jordan measurable.

L3step 1.1step 1.2∎
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A compact subset of an open Euclidean set has a compact Jordan neighborhood inside that open set

Statement

Let n≥1. If C⊆U⊆Rn, where C is compact and U is open, then there is a compact Jordan set K such that C⊆int⁡K⊆K⊆U. The set K can be chosen as a finite union of closed grid rectangles.

Facts & Assumptions

Proof

technique · finite-cover
1.1

For each x∈C, openness gives a closed grid rectangle Rx⊆U with x∈int⁡Rx. The interiors cover C, so [L1] selects R1,…,RN. Put K=⋃iRi. Then C⊆int⁡K⊆K⊆U.

L1given
2.1

The finite union K is closed and bounded, hence compact by [L2]. Its boundary is contained in the union of the boundaries of the Ri. Each rectangular face is a continuous coordinate graph over a bounded rectangle and is null by [L3]; a finite union remains null.

L2L3step 1.1
3.1

The boundary criterion in [L3] now makes K Jordan measurable. Subdividing the finitely many rectangles by their common coordinate endpoints expresses the same set as a finite union of closed cells from one grid.

L3step 2.1∎
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A bounded open Jordan set has an increasing exhaustion by compact finite unions of grid rectangles with vanishing content remainder

Statement

Let n≥1 and let V⊆Rn be bounded, open, and Jordan measurable. There are compact Jordan sets K1⊆K2⊆⋯⊆V, each a finite union of closed grid rectangles, such that every compact C⊆V lies in some Kj and cont⁡(V∖Kj)⟶0.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Bounded open Jordan set V.

[L1]

A bounded set is Jordan measurable exactly when its boundary has content zero (A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero).

[L2]

A finite cube cover can be replaced by sufficiently fine grid cells with controlled total volume (A finite rectangle cover admits grid control with arbitrarily small volume excess).

[L3]

Jordan content is finitely additive on interior-disjoint Jordan pieces (Jordan content is finitely additive when the overlap has content zero).

Proof

technique · exhaustion
1.1

Enclose V in a rectangle and choose nested dyadic grids whose meshes tend to zero. Let Kj be the union of every closed cell of the jth grid that is contained in V. Only finitely many cells occur. Every child of a retained cell is retained, so Kj⊆Kj+1; each Kj is compact, Jordan, and contained in V.

given
2.1

If compact C⊆V, the distance from C to the closed complement of V is positive. Once the mesh diameter is smaller than that distance, every grid cell meeting C is contained in V, so C⊆Kj.

givenstep 1.1
3.1

Every unretained cell meeting V also meets a mesh-sized neighborhood of ∂V. By [L1], that boundary has content zero; [L2] therefore makes the total volume of all such cells arbitrarily small for fine enough grids. Finite additivity [L3] bounds cont⁡(V∖Kj) by that volume, proving the limit.

L1L2L3∎
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set

Statement

Let n≥1, let U⊆Rn be open, let g:U→Rn be injective and C1, and suppose Dg(x) is invertible for every x∈U. Let K⊆U be compact and Jordan measurable. For a bounded function f:g(K)→R, the following are equivalent:

  1. f is Riemann integrable on g(K);
  2. x↦f(g(x))∣det⁡Dg(x)∣ is Riemann integrable on K.

When either condition holds, ∫g(K)f(y) dy=∫Kf(g(x))∣det⁡Dg(x)∣ dx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The map g, compact Jordan set K, and bounded f in the statement.

[L1]

For each fixed n≥1, the function det⁡:Mn(R)→R is evaluation of a polynomial in the n2 matrix-entry variables (For every fixed finite size at least one, the determinant of a real square matrix is a polynomial in its matrix entries), and componentwise continuity gives continuity of maps assembled from finitely many continuous components (A vector-valued function has a limit, or is continuous, if and only if each of its components does; with the algebra of continuous vector-valued functions).

[L2]

Local C1 volume distortion is bounded by factors arbitrarily close to the absolute determinant of the derivative (On a small cube, a C1 diffeomorphism distorts Jordan content by factors arbitrarily close to its linearized absolute determinant), with finite Jordan cover bounds controlling upper and lower sums (Finite Jordan covers bound upper integrals, while interior-disjoint Jordan subfamilies bound lower integrals).

[L3]

The image g(K) is compact Jordan (An injective C1 map with invertible derivative sends compact Jordan sets to compact Jordan sets), while the inverse function theorem supplies local C1 inverses (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

[L4]

The chain rule multiplies derivatives (The chain rule for total derivatives: D(g∘f)(a)=Dg(f(a))∘Df(a)), and for n≥1 and A,B∈Mn(R) over a commutative ring one has det⁡(AB)=det⁡(A)det⁡(B) (For same-sized finite square matrices over a commutative ring, det⁡(AB)=det⁡(A)det⁡(B)).

[L5]

The Riemann integral is linear, monotone, and stable under absolute value (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm), with Jordan-set values independent of the bounding rectangle (The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle).

[L6]

Every continuous real function on a compact Jordan set is Riemann integrable there (A continuous real function on a compact Jordan measurable set is Riemann integrable over that set).

[L7]

Finite Jordan covers bound upper integrals, and interior-disjoint Jordan subfamilies bound lower integrals (Finite Jordan covers bound upper integrals, while interior-disjoint Jordan subfamilies bound lower integrals).

Proof

technique · local-to-global
1.1

The entries of Dg are continuous; [L1] therefore makes det⁡Dg and ∣det⁡Dg∣ continuous on K, and [L6] makes the absolute determinant bounded and Riemann integrable. By [L3], g(K) is also a compact Jordan set.

L1L3L6
1.2

Global injectivity and [L3] patch the local inverses into a C1 inverse G:g(U)→U. By [L4], DG(g(x))Dg(x)=I and ∣det⁡DG(g(x))∣ ∣det⁡Dg(x)∣=1.

L3L4
2.1

Let E⊆K be compact Jordan. Cover it by finitely many cubes on which [L2] gives volume factors ∣det⁡Dg(a)∣(1±ε)n and on which ∣det⁡Dg∣ has arbitrarily small oscillation. A common interior-disjoint grid refinement and [L7] compare cont⁡(g(E)) with the lower and upper sums of ∣det⁡Dg∣ over E. Letting the mesh and ε tend to zero gives cont⁡(g(E))=∫E∣det⁡Dg∣.

L2L7step 1.1step 1.2
3.1

First take f≥0 integrable on g(K). A fine rectangular grid of a bounding rectangle cuts g(K), up to content-zero shared faces, into compact Jordan pieces Fj on which the lower and upper Darboux step functions have arbitrarily small integral gap. Their preimages Ej=G(Fj) are compact Jordan by [L3]. Step 2.1 turns every coefficient times cont⁡(Fj) into the integral of that coefficient times ∣det⁡Dg∣ over Ej. Hence the pulled-back lower and upper step functions squeeze (f∘g)∣det⁡Dg∣ with the same arbitrarily small gap, proving its integrability and the formula. Applying this implication to G and using step 1.2 proves the converse.

L3L5step 1.2step 2.1
4.1

For signed f, apply step 3.1 to f+=max⁡(f,0) and f−=max⁡(−f,0). Stability under absolute value and linearity in [L5] give both integrability implications and the formula for f=f+−f−. Bounding-rectangle independence also follows from [L5].

L5step 3.1∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: Literature-sourcedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The content of a compact Jordan image is the integral of the absolute Jacobian determinant

Statement

Under the hypotheses of Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set, cont⁡(g(K))=∫K∣det⁡Dg(x)∣ dx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Open U, injective C1 map g with invertible derivative, and compact Jordan K⊆U.

[L1]

Compact-Jordan change of variables applies to every bounded integrable function on g(K) (Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set).

[L2]

The integral of the constant-one function over a Jordan set is its Jordan content (A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

By [L1], g(K) is Jordan and change of variables applies to the constant function 1 on it.

L1given
2.1

Its pullback is ∣det⁡Dg∣, while [L2] identifies the image integral with cont⁡(g(K)). This is the displayed formula.

L1L2step 1.1∎
DefinitionDefinition: AI-adaptedProof: Not applicableaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The support of a function on Rn and its compactly supported Riemann integral

Definition

Let n≥1. For f:Rn→R, its support is supp⁡f:={x∈Rn:f(x)≠0}‾. The function is compactly supported if supp⁡f is compact.

A compactly supported f is compactly supported Riemann integrable if there is a nondegenerate closed rectangle Q with supp⁡f⊆int⁡Q such that f∣Q is Riemann integrable. Its integral over Euclidean space is defined by ∫Rnf:=∫Qf. The value is independent of Q by The Riemann integral of a compactly supported function is independent of its bounding rectangle ↗. When the support is empty, f=0 and the value is 0.

LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

The Riemann integral of a compactly supported function is independent of its bounding rectangle

Statement

Let n≥1 and let f:Rn→R have compact support. If f is Riemann integrable on one closed rectangle whose interior contains its support, then it is integrable on every such rectangle, and all the resulting integrals are equal. This includes the empty-support case.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Compactly supported f and bounding rectangles Q1,Q2 whose interiors contain its support.

[L1]

Extending an integrable function on a Jordan set by zero to a bounding rectangle gives a well-defined integral independent of that rectangle (The Riemann integral over a Jordan set is independent of the bounding rectangle).

[L2]

Cutting rectangles along coordinate hyperplanes preserves integrability and adds the integrals of the pieces (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm).

Proof

technique · common-extension
1.1

Choose a third rectangle Q whose interior contains Q1∪Q2. Since f=0 outside its support, extending f∣Qi by zero to Q recovers exactly f∣Q.

given
2.1

If f∣Q1 is integrable, [L1] makes its zero extension integrable on Q with the same integral. Restricting this function to Q2 by the coordinate cuts in [L2] gives integrability there, again with zero contribution off the support.

L1L2step 1.1
3.1

Applying [L1] to Q1 and Q2 inside the common rectangle yields ∫Q1f=∫Qf=∫Q2f. If the support is empty, all three functions are identically zero, so the same argument gives value 0.

L1step 2.1∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

A compactly supported Riemann integrand admits the global change-of-variables formula from a diffeomorphism near the relevant compact preimage

Statement

Let n≥1, let U⊆Rn be open, and let g:U→Rn be injective and C1, with Dg(x) invertible on U. Let f:Rn→R be compactly supported Riemann integrable and suppose supp⁡f⊆g(U). Define h(x)={f(g(x))∣det⁡Dg(x)∣,x∈U,0,x∉U. Then h is compactly supported Riemann integrable and ∫Rnf(y) dy=∫Rnh(x) dx.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The local diffeomorphism data and compactly supported f in the statement.

[L1]

A compact subset of an open Euclidean set lies in the interior of a compact Jordan neighborhood contained in that open set (A compact subset of an open Euclidean set has a compact Jordan neighborhood inside that open set).

[L2]

Compact-Jordan change of variables gives the integral formula on such a neighborhood (Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set).

[L3]

Compactly supported integrals are independent of their bounding rectangles (The Riemann integral of a compactly supported function is independent of its bounding rectangle).

[L4]

The inverse function theorem gives a local C1 inverse wherever the derivative is invertible (The Euclidean inverse function theorem).

Proof

technique · reduction
1.1

By [L4] and global injectivity, the local inverses patch to a continuous inverse on g(U). Thus C=g−1(supp⁡f) is compact and lies in U. By [L1], choose compact Jordan K with C⊆int⁡K⊆K⊆U.

L1L4given
2.1

The function f vanishes outside g(K), while h vanishes outside K. Apply [L2] to f∣g(K); its transformed integrand is h∣K, giving ∫g(K)f=∫Kh.

L2step 1.1
3.1

The support of h is contained in the compact set C, because f(g(x))=0 away from its preimage. Thus h is compactly supported and [L3] identifies the two integrals in step 2.1 with the corresponding integrals over Rn.

L3step 2.1∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

Change of variables on bounded open Jordan sets when both integrands are bounded and Riemann integrable

Statement

Let n≥1, let W⊆Rn be open, let U be a bounded open Jordan set with U‾⊆W, and let g:W→Rn be injective and C1, with invertible derivative throughout W. Put V=g(U) and assume V is a bounded open Jordan set. If f:V→R and h(x)=f(g(x))∣det⁡Dg(x)∣(x∈U) are both bounded and Riemann integrable on their respective Jordan sets, then ∫Vf(y) dy=∫Uh(x) dx. No improper-integral convention is implicit in this statement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The bounded open Jordan sets, map, and two bounded integrable functions in the statement.

[L1]

A bounded open Jordan set has a compact grid exhaustion with vanishing-content remainder (A bounded open Jordan set has an increasing exhaustion by compact finite unions of grid rectangles with vanishing content remainder).

[L2]

Compact-Jordan change of variables applies to every member of that exhaustion (Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set).

[L3]

On a bounding rectangle, the absolute value of an integral is bounded by the integral of the absolute value (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm); zero extension gives the corresponding supremum-times-content bound on a Jordan subset.

Proof

technique · exhaustion
1.1

If U=∅, then V=∅ and both integrals are 0. Otherwise choose the compact grid exhaustion Kj↑U from [L1]. For every j, [L2] gives ∫g(Kj)f=∫Kjh.

L1L2given
2.1

A bound Mh for ∣h∣ gives source error at most Mhcont⁡(U∖Kj), which tends to zero by [L1] and [L3].

L1L3givenstep 1.1
3.1

The compact set U‾ is nonempty, and [L4] gives a bound MD for ∣det⁡Dg∣ on it. Apply [L2] to the compact Jordan remainder U‾∖int⁡Kj with the constant-one function. Its content tends to zero with cont⁡(U∖Kj), so cont⁡(V∖g(Kj))≤MDcont⁡(U‾∖int⁡Kj)→0. A bound for ∣f∣ and [L3] make the image error tend to zero as well. Passing to the limit in step 1.1 proves the formula.

L2L3L4givenstep 1.1step 2.1∎
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11Open item page →

In one dimension the compact-Jordan formula is substitution over the unoriented image interval with the absolute derivative

Statement

Let a<b, let φ be C1 and injective on a neighborhood of [a,b], and suppose φ′(x)≠0 there. If f is continuous on an interval containing φ([a,b]), then ∫min⁡{φ(a),φ(b)}max⁡{φ(a),φ(b)}f(y) dy=∫abf(φ(x))∣φ′(x)∣ dx. Thus the absolute derivative is the correct factor for the unoriented image interval.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The interval, injective C1 map φ, nonvanishing derivative, and continuous f.

[L1]

A continuous injection on an interval is strictly increasing or strictly decreasing (A continuous injective function on an interval is strictly monotone).

[L3]

Compact-Jordan change of variables in dimension one uses the absolute Jacobian determinant (Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set).

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

Assume first that φ is increasing. Every difference quotient using two points of [a,b] is nonnegative, so an inward sequence at either endpoint and a two-sided sequence in the interior show that the derivative is nonnegative; nonvanishing makes it positive throughout. Thus [L2] is exactly the displayed formula.

L1L2givenassume-case increasing
1.2

Assume instead that φ is decreasing. The same inward difference-quotient argument makes φ′≤0 on [a,b], so nonvanishing makes φ′<0 throughout. This reverses both the oriented endpoints and the derivative sign in [L2], and consequently gives ∫φ(b)φ(a)f=∫ab(f∘φ)∣φ′∣.

L1L2givenassume-case decreasing
2.1

The alternatives are exhaustive by [L1], and [L3] identifies ∣φ′∣ with the one-dimensional absolute Jacobian factor.

L1L3cases-exhaustive: increasing or decreasing∎

5 · Examples, counterexamples and false statements

None yet.

Sources