Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Finite Jordan covers bound upper integrals, while interior-disjoint Jordan subfamilies bound lower integrals

Statement

Let n≥1, let E⊆Rn be a bounded Jordan set, and let h:E→[0,∞) be bounded and Riemann integrable.

  1. If Jordan sets E1,…,EN cover E, and each Mi≥0 satisfies Mi≥sup⁡E∩Eih whenever that intersection is nonempty, then ∫Eh≤∑i=1NMicont⁡(Ei).
  2. If Jordan sets F1,…,FN lie in E and have pairwise disjoint interiors, and each real mi satisfies mi≤inf⁡Fih whenever Fi is nonempty, then ∑i=1Nmicont⁡(Fi)≤∫Eh.

For an arbitrary bounded integrable real h and a nonempty Jordan set F⊆E, ∣∫Fh∣≤sup⁡F∣h∣cont⁡(F).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The Jordan sets and bounded integrable function in the statement.

[L1]

On a bounding rectangle, the Riemann integral is linear, monotone, and bounded by the integral of the absolute value (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm); zero extension transfers these properties to Jordan-set integrals.

[L2]

The indicator of a bounded Jordan set is Riemann integrable with integral equal to its content (A bounded set is Jordan measurable iff its indicator is Riemann integrable, and the integral is its Jordan content), and a bounded set is Jordan measurable exactly when its boundary has content zero (A bounded set in Rm is Jordan measurable iff its boundary is null, equivalently of content zero).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

Extend all functions by zero to one bounding rectangle. The indicators in [L2] are integrable, and the nonnegativity of every Mi makes the following inequality valid both on and off E. Monotonicity and finite linearity from [L1] give the cover bound, because each indicator integral is the content of its Jordan set: h≤∑i=1NMi1Ei.

L1L2given
1.2

The restriction of h to each Fi is integrable: away from grid cells meeting ∂Fi its Darboux gap is inherited from h, while [L2] makes the total volume of boundary cells arbitrarily small. Hence ∫Fih≥micont⁡(Fi) by [L1]. Pairwise interior-disjoint Jordan sets intersect only on their content-zero boundaries, so the sum of their zero-extended restrictions equals the restriction to their union outside a content-zero set. The same boundary-cell argument and linearity [L1] therefore add these integrals without overcounting; their union lies in E, and h≥0, giving the lower bound.

L1L2
2.1

The boundary-cell argument in step 1.2 also makes the restriction of a signed integrable h to F integrable. A nonempty F makes sup⁡F∣h∣ a real number, since h is bounded. On F, the inequalities −∣h∣≤h≤∣h∣≤sup⁡F∣h∣ and [L1], together with the indicator identity in [L2], give the last estimate.

L1L2step 1.2∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

26 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources