Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

In one dimension the compact-Jordan formula is substitution over the unoriented image interval with the absolute derivative

Statement

Let a<b, let φ be C1 and injective on a neighborhood of [a,b], and suppose φ′(x)≠0 there. If f is continuous on an interval containing φ([a,b]), then ∫min⁡{φ(a),φ(b)}max⁡{φ(a),φ(b)}f(y) dy=∫abf(φ(x))∣φ′(x)∣ dx. Thus the absolute derivative is the correct factor for the unoriented image interval.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The interval, injective C1 map φ, nonvanishing derivative, and continuous f.

[L1]

A continuous injection on an interval is strictly increasing or strictly decreasing (A continuous injective function on an interval is strictly monotone).

[L3]

Compact-Jordan change of variables in dimension one uses the absolute Jacobian determinant (Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set).

Proof

technique · cases
1.1

Assume first that φ is increasing. Every difference quotient using two points of [a,b] is nonnegative, so an inward sequence at either endpoint and a two-sided sequence in the interior show that the derivative is nonnegative; nonvanishing makes it positive throughout. Thus [L2] is exactly the displayed formula.

L1L2givenassume-case increasing
1.2

Assume instead that φ is decreasing. The same inward difference-quotient argument makes φ′≤0 on [a,b], so nonvanishing makes φ′<0 throughout. This reverses both the oriented endpoints and the derivative sign in [L2], and consequently gives ∫φ(b)φ(a)f=∫ab(f∘φ)∣φ′∣.

L1L2givenassume-case decreasing
2.1

The alternatives are exhaustive by [L1], and [L3] identifies ∣φ′∣ with the one-dimensional absolute Jacobian factor.

L1L3cases-exhaustive: increasing or decreasing∎

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · two levels

36 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources