Alphabeta Math
CorollaryStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Change of variables on bounded open Jordan sets when both integrands are bounded and Riemann integrable

Statement

Let n≥1, let W⊆Rn be open, let U be a bounded open Jordan set with U‾⊆W, and let g:W→Rn be injective and C1, with invertible derivative throughout W. Put V=g(U) and assume V is a bounded open Jordan set. If f:V→R and h(x)=f(g(x))∣det⁡Dg(x)∣(x∈U) are both bounded and Riemann integrable on their respective Jordan sets, then ∫Vf(y) dy=∫Uh(x) dx. No improper-integral convention is implicit in this statement.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The bounded open Jordan sets, map, and two bounded integrable functions in the statement.

[L1]

A bounded open Jordan set has a compact grid exhaustion with vanishing-content remainder (A bounded open Jordan set has an increasing exhaustion by compact finite unions of grid rectangles with vanishing content remainder).

[L2]

Compact-Jordan change of variables applies to every member of that exhaustion (Change of variables for an injective C1 map on a compact Jordan set).

[L3]

On a bounding rectangle, the absolute value of an integral is bounded by the integral of the absolute value (Linearity, monotonicity, the absolute-value estimate and coordinate-slice additivity for the Riemann integral in Rm); zero extension gives the corresponding supremum-times-content bound on a Jordan subset.

Proof

technique · exhaustion
1.1

If U=∅, then V=∅ and both integrals are 0. Otherwise choose the compact grid exhaustion Kj↑U from [L1]. For every j, [L2] gives ∫g(Kj)f=∫Kjh.

L1L2given
2.1

A bound Mh for ∣h∣ gives source error at most Mhcont⁡(U∖Kj), which tends to zero by [L1] and [L3].

L1L3givenstep 1.1
3.1

The compact set U‾ is nonempty, and [L4] gives a bound MD for ∣det⁡Dg∣ on it. Apply [L2] to the compact Jordan remainder U‾∖int⁡Kj with the constant-one function. Its content tends to zero with cont⁡(U∖Kj), so cont⁡(V∖g(Kj))≤MDcont⁡(U‾∖int⁡Kj)→0. A bound for ∣f∣ and [L3] make the image error tend to zero as well. Passing to the limit in step 1.1 proves the formula.

L2L3L4givenstep 1.1step 2.1∎

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

76 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources