Alphabeta Math
LemmaStatement: Literature-sourcedProof: AI-adaptedSession-authored (Fable 5 assisted)precheck passaudited 2026-08-11
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced — the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted — a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated — a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

A C1C^1 map uniformly close to the identity derivative sandwiches a cube between contracted and expanded cubes

Statement

Let n1n\ge1, let C(a,r)={x:xar}C(a,r)=\{x:\|x-a\|_\infty\le r\} with r>0r>0, let WRnW\subseteq\mathbb R^n be convex and open with C(a,r)WC(a,r)\subseteq W, and let F:WRnF:W\to\mathbb R^n be C1C^1. Assume F(a)=aF(a)=a and, for some 0q<10\le q<1, (DF(z)I)v2qnv2\|(DF(z)-I)v\|_2\le \frac q{\sqrt n}\|v\|_2 for every zWz\in W and vRnv\in\mathbb R^n. Then C(a,(1q)r)F(C(a,r))C(a,(1+q)r).C(a,(1-q)r)\subseteq F(C(a,r))\subseteq C(a,(1+q)r). Moreover, FF is injective on C(a,r)C(a,r).

Facts & Assumptions

Given: The cube, the C1C^1 map, and the strict derivative error bound in the statement.

[L4]

The Euclidean and sup norms satisfy ww2nw\|w\|_\infty\le\|w\|_2\le\sqrt n\|w\|_\infty (Each p\lVert\cdot\rVert_p is a norm on Rn\mathbb{R}^n, and the induced metrics are exactly d1d_1, d2d_2 and dd_\infty of the published metric-spaces page).

Proof

technique · fixed-point
1.1

Put R=FIR=F-I and use [L1] with the Euclidean--sup norm comparison [L4] to obtain the contraction estimate R(x)R(y)qxy\|R(x)-R(y)\|_\infty\le q\|x-y\|_\infty on the cube. In particular R(x)qr\|R(x)\|_\infty\le qr, so F(x)=x+R(x)F(x)=x+R(x) lies in C(a,(1+q)r)C(a,(1+q)r).

L1L4given
2.1

Fix zC(a,(1q)r)z\in C(a,(1-q)r) and define Sz(x)=zR(x)S_z(x)=z-R(x). Step 1.1 gives Sz(C(a,r))C(a,r)S_z(C(a,r))\subseteq C(a,r) and makes SzS_z a qq-contraction. The cube is a nonempty closed subset of complete Euclidean space, so [L2]--[L3] give xC(a,r)x\in C(a,r) with Sz(x)=xS_z(x)=x, equivalently F(x)=zF(x)=z. This proves the inner containment.

L2L3step 1.1
3.1

If F(x)=F(y)F(x)=F(y), then xy=R(y)R(x)x-y=R(y)-R(x), so step 1.1 gives xyqxy\|x-y\|_\infty\le q\|x-y\|_\infty. Since q<1q<1, x=yx=y. The assumptions r>0r>0 and q<1q<1 are essential to the nondegenerate fixed-point argument.

step 1.1algebra

Depends on

Used by

Dependency tree · next 3 levels

Direct dependencies and their dependencies through the next three levels: 176 results over 33 levels. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, and this result sits at the bottom with a heavier outline. Click the chart to enlarge it.

Sources