Alphabeta Math
TheoremStatement: AI-adaptedProof: AI-adaptedprecheck passjudge pass (z-ai/glm-5.2)audited 2026-07-27
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

For rational p>0, ∑1/kp converges iff p>1

Statement

Let p∈Q with p>0. For a natural number k≥1 write ι(k)=k⋅1R for the canonical natural, which is positive (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing), and write kp:=ι(k)p for its rational power (Rational powers ar of a positive base). Then

∑k≥11kp converges⟺p>1.

In particular the harmonic series ∑k≥11/k diverges, at p=1, and ∑k≥11/k2 converges, at p=2.

The index range is not cosmetic. The series starts at k=1 because 1/0p is undefined: Rational powers ar of a positive base gives 0p=0 for rational p>0, and 0 has no inverse. Sequences here are functions on N and N contains 0 (Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series), so the object named above is a series from the starting index 1 in the sense of Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series, not a series of a sequence on N.

The exponent is rational, and that is a limitation of this page. Rational powers of a positive base are what Rational powers ar of a positive base supplies; real exponents require the exponential and the logarithm, which this library develops later. The statement above is therefore the full p-series theorem for every exponent this page can name.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: A rational p>0 and the family ak:=1/kp=ι(k)−p, defined for naturals k≥1 (Rational powers ar of a positive base, Series, partial sums, convergence and the sum, divergence, and the tail series).

[L1]

Rational powers of a positive base are positive, and ar+s=aras, (ar)s=ars, a−r=1/ar for a>0 and rationals r,s (Laws of rational exponents).

[L2]

Monotonicity of rational powers: for rational t>0 and 0<a<b one has at<bt; and for a>1 and rationals r<s one has ar<as (Monotonicity of r↦ar and of a↦ar).

[L3]

The integer power and the rational power agree at an integer exponent: for a>0 and n∈Z, an read as in Integer powers am equals an read as in Rational powers ar of a positive base, since n=n/1 and a1/1=a (Existence and uniqueness of n-th roots: a unique a1/n≥0 with (a1/n)n=a, Rational powers ar of a positive base). In particular a0=1.

[L4]

Reciprocation reverses the order on the positives: 0<a<b implies 0<1/b<1/a (Inverses of positives are positive, and reciprocation reverses order).

[L5]

Condensation: for a family (xk)k≥1 that is nonnegative and nonincreasing, ∑k≥1xk converges if and only if ∑j≥02jx2j converges (For a nonincreasing nonnegative sequence, ∑ak converges iff ∑2ka2k converges, Nondecreasing, increasing, nonincreasing, decreasing, monotone, and eventually monotone sequences).

[L7]

The canonical naturals are positive and order preserving: 0<ι(1)≤ι(j)<ι(k) for naturals 1≤j<k, and ι(2)=2>1 (Canonical naturals are positive and strictly increasing).

Proof

technique · direct
1.1

For every natural k≥1 the base ι(k) is positive, so ak=ι(k)−p is defined and positive; in particular the family is nonnegative.

givenL7L1
1.2

For naturals 1≤j<k we have 0<ι(j)<ι(k), hence ι(j)p<ι(k)p since p>0, hence aj=1/ι(j)p>1/ι(k)p=ak; and for j=k the two are equal. So aj≥ak whenever 1≤j≤k.

givenL7L2L4L1
1.3

For every j∈N the base 2j is positive and, reading the exponent j as a rational, 2ja2j=2j(2j)−p=2j⋅2−jp=2 j−jp=2 (1−p)j=(2 1−p)j.

L1L3L7algebra
1.4

Since 2>1, the map t↦2t is strictly increasing on Q and 20=1; hence r=2 1−p<1=20 holds exactly when 1−p<0, that is exactly when p>1.

L2L3L7
2.1

Condensation applies to (ak)k≥1: ∑k≥1ak converges if and only if ∑j≥02ja2j converges.

step 1.1step 1.2L5
2.2

So the condensed series is the geometric series ∑j≥0rj with r:=2 1−p, and r>0, so ∣r∣=r.

step 1.3L1L3
3.1

By the geometric series theorem, ∑j≥0rj converges if and only if r<1.

step 2.2L6
4.1

Chaining the three equivalences: ∑k≥11/kp converges   ⟺   the condensed series converges   ⟺   r<1   ⟺   p>1.

step 2.1step 2.2step 3.1step 1.4∎

Remarks

  • Where the threshold comes from. Condensation turns the p-series into a geometric series of ratio 21−p, and the geometric threshold r=1 pulls back to p=1. Nothing about the number 1 is special to the p-series; it is the exponent at which the condensed terms stop shrinking.

  • At p=1 the condensed series is ∑j≥01. Its terms do not tend to 0, so it diverges, and with it the harmonic series. That instance is worked out on the companion page, together with the older block argument that does not use condensation at all.

  • Only rational exponents are covered, and the gap is real. For irrational p the expression kp has no meaning in this library yet, so the statement is not merely unproved there, it is unstatable. The same limitation is what keeps the Bertrand-type series ∑1/(k(log⁡k)p) off this page entirely, the logarithm not being available.

Depends on

Used by

…and 6 more results.

Dependency tree · two levels

58 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources