Alphabeta Math
CounterexampleConstruction: AI-adaptedVerification: AI-adaptedPipeline-generatedjudge pass (gpt-5.6-terra)audited 2026-09-22
How statement and proof provenance work

The first chip identifies the source of the statement or construction; the second identifies the source of its local proof or verification.

  • Literature-sourced: the exact statement appears in a cited source; only wording and notation differ.
  • AI-adapted: a semantically identical restatement of literature-sourced material, modulo indexing, notation, and boundary cases adopted by the library.
  • AI-generated: a genuinely novel statement formulated by AI, with no source for the claim itself.

These labels describe origin, not correctness: citations and verification chips remain separate evidence.

Hilbert Schmidt does not imply trace class

Statement refuted

Assume the Axiom of Countable Choice (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)). Let 2:=2(N,F) with standard basis (un)nN and define the diagonal operator Tu0:=0,Tun:=n1un(n1), extended linearly and by continuity. Then T is Hilbert–Schmidt relative to the standard basis (Hilbert–Schmidt operator and Hilbert–Schmidt norm) but not trace class (Trace class operator); that is, the Hilbert–Schmidt property does not imply the trace-class property.

Facts & Assumptions

Given: Countable Choice, the space 2 with its standard basis (un), and the diagonal operator with d0=0, dn=n1 for n1.

[A1]

Diagonal criteria. For a diagonal operator with bounded sequence d: boundedness with T=supndn, compactness in the case dn0 and only there, the Hilbert–Schmidt criterion ndn2<+ with THS2=ndn2 relative to the standard basis, and the trace-class criterion ndn<+ with T1=ndn (Diagonal Schatten class criteria on ell two, Hilbert–Schmidt operator and Hilbert–Schmidt norm, Trace class operator, Absolute value and singular values of a compact operator).

[A2]

p-series. For rational p>1 the series k1kp converges, and at p=1 the harmonic series diverges; in particular k1k2<+ and k1k1=+ (For rational p>0, 1/kp converges iff p>1).

[A3]

Countable Choice is the standing hypothesis (The Axiom of Countable Choice (ACω)).

Counterexample

technique · direct

Given: Countable Choice, the sequence d0=0, dn=n1, and the diagonal operator T.

1.1

T is Hilbert–Schmidt. The sequence (dn) is bounded by 1 and n1dn2=n1n2<+ by [A2]; hence T is Hilbert–Schmidt relative to the standard basis with THS2=n1n2 by the diagonal criterion [A1].

A1A2
1.2

T is not trace class. The positive singular values of the diagonal operator are n1, n1, in nonincreasing order with multiplicity [A1]. Their series n1n1 diverges by [A2], so the finiteness condition in the trace-class definition fails and T is not trace class. No value of T1 is assigned, because that norm is defined only for trace-class operators.

A1A2
2.1

Conclusion. T is Hilbert–Schmidt by [step 1.1] and not trace class by [step 1.2]; hence the Hilbert–Schmidt property does not imply the trace-class property.

step 1.1step 1.2A3

Depends on

Used by

Nothing in the library uses this result yet.

Dependency tree · two levels

69 results within two dependency steps of this one, each drawn at its shortest distance from it. An arrow runs from a result to what uses it, so the chart reads left to right and ends at this result, which carries a heavier outline. Every node is a link to that result. Click elsewhere on the chart to enlarge it.

Sources